Cargando…
A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains
BACKGROUND: The mouse inbred line C57BL/6J is widely used in mouse genetics and its genome has been incorporated into many genetic reference populations. More recently large initiatives such as the International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC) are using the C57BL/6N mouse strain to generate null al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-r82 |
_version_ | 1782320439631020032 |
---|---|
author | Simon, Michelle M Greenaway, Simon White, Jacqueline K Fuchs, Helmut Gailus-Durner, Valérie Wells, Sara Sorg, Tania Wong, Kim Bedu, Elodie Cartwright, Elizabeth J Dacquin, Romain Djebali, Sophia Estabel, Jeanne Graw, Jochen Ingham, Neil J Jackson, Ian J Lengeling, Andreas Mandillo, Silvia Marvel, Jacqueline Meziane, Hamid Preitner, Frédéric Puk, Oliver Roux, Michel Adams, David J Atkins, Sarah Ayadi, Abdel Becker, Lore Blake, Andrew Brooker, Debra Cater, Heather Champy, Marie-France Combe, Roy Danecek, Petr di Fenza, Armida Gates, Hilary Gerdin, Anna-Karin Golini, Elisabetta Hancock, John M Hans, Wolfgang Hölter, Sabine M Hough, Tertius Jurdic, Pierre Keane, Thomas M Morgan, Hugh Müller, Werner Neff, Frauke Nicholson, George Pasche, Bastian Roberson, Laura-Anne Rozman, Jan Sanderson, Mark Santos, Luis Selloum, Mohammed Shannon, Carl Southwell, Anne Tocchini-Valentini, Glauco P Vancollie, Valerie E Westerberg, Henrik Wurst, Wolfgang Zi, Min Yalcin, Binnaz Ramirez-Solis, Ramiro Steel, Karen P Mallon, Ann-Marie de Angelis, Martin Hrabě Herault, Yann Brown, Steve DM |
author_facet | Simon, Michelle M Greenaway, Simon White, Jacqueline K Fuchs, Helmut Gailus-Durner, Valérie Wells, Sara Sorg, Tania Wong, Kim Bedu, Elodie Cartwright, Elizabeth J Dacquin, Romain Djebali, Sophia Estabel, Jeanne Graw, Jochen Ingham, Neil J Jackson, Ian J Lengeling, Andreas Mandillo, Silvia Marvel, Jacqueline Meziane, Hamid Preitner, Frédéric Puk, Oliver Roux, Michel Adams, David J Atkins, Sarah Ayadi, Abdel Becker, Lore Blake, Andrew Brooker, Debra Cater, Heather Champy, Marie-France Combe, Roy Danecek, Petr di Fenza, Armida Gates, Hilary Gerdin, Anna-Karin Golini, Elisabetta Hancock, John M Hans, Wolfgang Hölter, Sabine M Hough, Tertius Jurdic, Pierre Keane, Thomas M Morgan, Hugh Müller, Werner Neff, Frauke Nicholson, George Pasche, Bastian Roberson, Laura-Anne Rozman, Jan Sanderson, Mark Santos, Luis Selloum, Mohammed Shannon, Carl Southwell, Anne Tocchini-Valentini, Glauco P Vancollie, Valerie E Westerberg, Henrik Wurst, Wolfgang Zi, Min Yalcin, Binnaz Ramirez-Solis, Ramiro Steel, Karen P Mallon, Ann-Marie de Angelis, Martin Hrabě Herault, Yann Brown, Steve DM |
author_sort | Simon, Michelle M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The mouse inbred line C57BL/6J is widely used in mouse genetics and its genome has been incorporated into many genetic reference populations. More recently large initiatives such as the International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC) are using the C57BL/6N mouse strain to generate null alleles for all mouse genes. Hence both strains are now widely used in mouse genetics studies. Here we perform a comprehensive genomic and phenotypic analysis of the two strains to identify differences that may influence their underlying genetic mechanisms. RESULTS: We undertake genome sequence comparisons of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N to identify SNPs, indels and structural variants, with a focus on identifying all coding variants. We annotate 34 SNPs and 2 indels that distinguish C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N coding sequences, as well as 15 structural variants that overlap a gene. In parallel we assess the comparative phenotypes of the two inbred lines utilizing the EMPReSSslim phenotyping pipeline, a broad based assessment encompassing diverse biological systems. We perform additional secondary phenotyping assessments to explore other phenotype domains and to elaborate phenotype differences identified in the primary assessment. We uncover significant phenotypic differences between the two lines, replicated across multiple centers, in a number of physiological, biochemical and behavioral systems. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N demonstrates a range of phenotypic differences that have the potential to impact upon penetrance and expressivity of mutational effects in these strains. Moreover, the sequence variants we identify provide a set of candidate genes for the phenotypic differences observed between the two strains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4053787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40537872014-06-12 A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains Simon, Michelle M Greenaway, Simon White, Jacqueline K Fuchs, Helmut Gailus-Durner, Valérie Wells, Sara Sorg, Tania Wong, Kim Bedu, Elodie Cartwright, Elizabeth J Dacquin, Romain Djebali, Sophia Estabel, Jeanne Graw, Jochen Ingham, Neil J Jackson, Ian J Lengeling, Andreas Mandillo, Silvia Marvel, Jacqueline Meziane, Hamid Preitner, Frédéric Puk, Oliver Roux, Michel Adams, David J Atkins, Sarah Ayadi, Abdel Becker, Lore Blake, Andrew Brooker, Debra Cater, Heather Champy, Marie-France Combe, Roy Danecek, Petr di Fenza, Armida Gates, Hilary Gerdin, Anna-Karin Golini, Elisabetta Hancock, John M Hans, Wolfgang Hölter, Sabine M Hough, Tertius Jurdic, Pierre Keane, Thomas M Morgan, Hugh Müller, Werner Neff, Frauke Nicholson, George Pasche, Bastian Roberson, Laura-Anne Rozman, Jan Sanderson, Mark Santos, Luis Selloum, Mohammed Shannon, Carl Southwell, Anne Tocchini-Valentini, Glauco P Vancollie, Valerie E Westerberg, Henrik Wurst, Wolfgang Zi, Min Yalcin, Binnaz Ramirez-Solis, Ramiro Steel, Karen P Mallon, Ann-Marie de Angelis, Martin Hrabě Herault, Yann Brown, Steve DM Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: The mouse inbred line C57BL/6J is widely used in mouse genetics and its genome has been incorporated into many genetic reference populations. More recently large initiatives such as the International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC) are using the C57BL/6N mouse strain to generate null alleles for all mouse genes. Hence both strains are now widely used in mouse genetics studies. Here we perform a comprehensive genomic and phenotypic analysis of the two strains to identify differences that may influence their underlying genetic mechanisms. RESULTS: We undertake genome sequence comparisons of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N to identify SNPs, indels and structural variants, with a focus on identifying all coding variants. We annotate 34 SNPs and 2 indels that distinguish C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N coding sequences, as well as 15 structural variants that overlap a gene. In parallel we assess the comparative phenotypes of the two inbred lines utilizing the EMPReSSslim phenotyping pipeline, a broad based assessment encompassing diverse biological systems. We perform additional secondary phenotyping assessments to explore other phenotype domains and to elaborate phenotype differences identified in the primary assessment. We uncover significant phenotypic differences between the two lines, replicated across multiple centers, in a number of physiological, biochemical and behavioral systems. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N demonstrates a range of phenotypic differences that have the potential to impact upon penetrance and expressivity of mutational effects in these strains. Moreover, the sequence variants we identify provide a set of candidate genes for the phenotypic differences observed between the two strains. BioMed Central 2013 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4053787/ /pubmed/23902802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-r82 Text en Copyright © 2013 Simon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Simon, Michelle M Greenaway, Simon White, Jacqueline K Fuchs, Helmut Gailus-Durner, Valérie Wells, Sara Sorg, Tania Wong, Kim Bedu, Elodie Cartwright, Elizabeth J Dacquin, Romain Djebali, Sophia Estabel, Jeanne Graw, Jochen Ingham, Neil J Jackson, Ian J Lengeling, Andreas Mandillo, Silvia Marvel, Jacqueline Meziane, Hamid Preitner, Frédéric Puk, Oliver Roux, Michel Adams, David J Atkins, Sarah Ayadi, Abdel Becker, Lore Blake, Andrew Brooker, Debra Cater, Heather Champy, Marie-France Combe, Roy Danecek, Petr di Fenza, Armida Gates, Hilary Gerdin, Anna-Karin Golini, Elisabetta Hancock, John M Hans, Wolfgang Hölter, Sabine M Hough, Tertius Jurdic, Pierre Keane, Thomas M Morgan, Hugh Müller, Werner Neff, Frauke Nicholson, George Pasche, Bastian Roberson, Laura-Anne Rozman, Jan Sanderson, Mark Santos, Luis Selloum, Mohammed Shannon, Carl Southwell, Anne Tocchini-Valentini, Glauco P Vancollie, Valerie E Westerberg, Henrik Wurst, Wolfgang Zi, Min Yalcin, Binnaz Ramirez-Solis, Ramiro Steel, Karen P Mallon, Ann-Marie de Angelis, Martin Hrabě Herault, Yann Brown, Steve DM A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains |
title | A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains |
title_full | A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains |
title_fullStr | A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains |
title_short | A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains |
title_sort | comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of c57bl/6j and c57bl/6n mouse strains |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-r82 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonmichellem acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT greenawaysimon acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT whitejacquelinek acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT fuchshelmut acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT gailusdurnervalerie acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT wellssara acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT sorgtania acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT wongkim acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT beduelodie acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT cartwrightelizabethj acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT dacquinromain acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT djebalisophia acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT estabeljeanne acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT grawjochen acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT inghamneilj acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT jacksonianj acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT lengelingandreas acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT mandillosilvia acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT marveljacqueline acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT mezianehamid acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT preitnerfrederic acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT pukoliver acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT rouxmichel acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT adamsdavidj acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT atkinssarah acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT ayadiabdel acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT beckerlore acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT blakeandrew acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT brookerdebra acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT caterheather acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT champymariefrance acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT comberoy acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT danecekpetr acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT difenzaarmida acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT gateshilary acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT gerdinannakarin acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT golinielisabetta acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT hancockjohnm acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT hanswolfgang acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT holtersabinem acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT houghtertius acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT jurdicpierre acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT keanethomasm acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT morganhugh acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT mullerwerner acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT nefffrauke acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT nicholsongeorge acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT paschebastian acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT robersonlauraanne acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT rozmanjan acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT sandersonmark acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT santosluis acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT selloummohammed acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT shannoncarl acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT southwellanne acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT tocchinivalentiniglaucop acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT vancollievaleriee acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT westerberghenrik acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT wurstwolfgang acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT zimin acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT yalcinbinnaz acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT ramirezsolisramiro acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT steelkarenp acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT mallonannmarie acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT deangelismartinhrabe acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT heraultyann acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT brownstevedm acomparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT simonmichellem comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT greenawaysimon comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT whitejacquelinek comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT fuchshelmut comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT gailusdurnervalerie comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT wellssara comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT sorgtania comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT wongkim comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT beduelodie comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT cartwrightelizabethj comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT dacquinromain comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT djebalisophia comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT estabeljeanne comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT grawjochen comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT inghamneilj comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT jacksonianj comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT lengelingandreas comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT mandillosilvia comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT marveljacqueline comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT mezianehamid comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT preitnerfrederic comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT pukoliver comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT rouxmichel comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT adamsdavidj comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT atkinssarah comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT ayadiabdel comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT beckerlore comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT blakeandrew comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT brookerdebra comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT caterheather comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT champymariefrance comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT comberoy comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT danecekpetr comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT difenzaarmida comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT gateshilary comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT gerdinannakarin comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT golinielisabetta comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT hancockjohnm comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT hanswolfgang comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT holtersabinem comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT houghtertius comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT jurdicpierre comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT keanethomasm comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT morganhugh comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT mullerwerner comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT nefffrauke comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT nicholsongeorge comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT paschebastian comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT robersonlauraanne comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT rozmanjan comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT sandersonmark comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT santosluis comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT selloummohammed comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT shannoncarl comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT southwellanne comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT tocchinivalentiniglaucop comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT vancollievaleriee comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT westerberghenrik comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT wurstwolfgang comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT zimin comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT yalcinbinnaz comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT ramirezsolisramiro comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT steelkarenp comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT mallonannmarie comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT deangelismartinhrabe comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT heraultyann comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains AT brownstevedm comparativephenotypicandgenomicanalysisofc57bl6jandc57bl6nmousestrains |