Cargando…
Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test
In fresh waters cyanobacterial blooms can produce a variety of toxins, such as microcystin variants (MCs) and anatoxin-a (ANA). ANA is a well-known neurotoxin, whereas MCs are hepatotoxic and, to a lesser degree, also neurotoxic. Neurotoxicity applies especially to invertebrates lacking livers. Curr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24776722 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504589 |
_version_ | 1782320455867170816 |
---|---|
author | Ju, Jingjuan Saul, Nadine Kochan, Cindy Putschew, Anke Pu, Yuepu Yin, Lihong Steinberg, Christian E. W. |
author_facet | Ju, Jingjuan Saul, Nadine Kochan, Cindy Putschew, Anke Pu, Yuepu Yin, Lihong Steinberg, Christian E. W. |
author_sort | Ju, Jingjuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | In fresh waters cyanobacterial blooms can produce a variety of toxins, such as microcystin variants (MCs) and anatoxin-a (ANA). ANA is a well-known neurotoxin, whereas MCs are hepatotoxic and, to a lesser degree, also neurotoxic. Neurotoxicity applies especially to invertebrates lacking livers. Current standardized neurotoxicity screening methods use rats or mice. However, in order to minimize vertebrate animal experiments as well as experimental time and effort, many investigators have proposed the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as an appropriate invertebrate model. Therefore, four known neurotoxic compounds (positive compounds: chlorpyrifos, abamectin, atropine, and acrylamide) were chosen to verify the expected impacts on autonomic (locomotion, feeding, defecation) and sensory (thermal, chemical, and mechanical sensory perception) functions in C. elegans. This study is another step towards successfully establishing C. elegans as an alternative neurotoxicity model. By using this protocol, anatoxin-a adversely affected locomotive behavior and pharyngeal pumping frequency and, most strongly, chemotactic and thermotactic behavior, whereas MC-LR impacted locomotion, pumping, and mechanical behavior, but not chemical sensory behavior. Environmental samples can also be screened in this simple and fast way for neurotoxic characteristics. The filtrate of a Microcystis aeruginosa culture, known for its hepatotoxicity, also displayed mild neurotoxicity (modulated short-term thermotaxis). These results show the suitability of this assay for environmental cyanotoxin-containing samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4053867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40538672014-06-12 Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test Ju, Jingjuan Saul, Nadine Kochan, Cindy Putschew, Anke Pu, Yuepu Yin, Lihong Steinberg, Christian E. W. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In fresh waters cyanobacterial blooms can produce a variety of toxins, such as microcystin variants (MCs) and anatoxin-a (ANA). ANA is a well-known neurotoxin, whereas MCs are hepatotoxic and, to a lesser degree, also neurotoxic. Neurotoxicity applies especially to invertebrates lacking livers. Current standardized neurotoxicity screening methods use rats or mice. However, in order to minimize vertebrate animal experiments as well as experimental time and effort, many investigators have proposed the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as an appropriate invertebrate model. Therefore, four known neurotoxic compounds (positive compounds: chlorpyrifos, abamectin, atropine, and acrylamide) were chosen to verify the expected impacts on autonomic (locomotion, feeding, defecation) and sensory (thermal, chemical, and mechanical sensory perception) functions in C. elegans. This study is another step towards successfully establishing C. elegans as an alternative neurotoxicity model. By using this protocol, anatoxin-a adversely affected locomotive behavior and pharyngeal pumping frequency and, most strongly, chemotactic and thermotactic behavior, whereas MC-LR impacted locomotion, pumping, and mechanical behavior, but not chemical sensory behavior. Environmental samples can also be screened in this simple and fast way for neurotoxic characteristics. The filtrate of a Microcystis aeruginosa culture, known for its hepatotoxicity, also displayed mild neurotoxicity (modulated short-term thermotaxis). These results show the suitability of this assay for environmental cyanotoxin-containing samples. MDPI 2014-04-25 2014-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4053867/ /pubmed/24776722 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504589 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ju, Jingjuan Saul, Nadine Kochan, Cindy Putschew, Anke Pu, Yuepu Yin, Lihong Steinberg, Christian E. W. Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test |
title | Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test |
title_full | Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test |
title_fullStr | Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test |
title_short | Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test |
title_sort | cyanobacterial xenobiotics as evaluated by a caenorhabditis elegans neurotoxicity screening test |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24776722 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jujingjuan cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest AT saulnadine cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest AT kochancindy cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest AT putschewanke cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest AT puyuepu cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest AT yinlihong cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest AT steinbergchristianew cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest |