Cargando…

Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test

In fresh waters cyanobacterial blooms can produce a variety of toxins, such as microcystin variants (MCs) and anatoxin-a (ANA). ANA is a well-known neurotoxin, whereas MCs are hepatotoxic and, to a lesser degree, also neurotoxic. Neurotoxicity applies especially to invertebrates lacking livers. Curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ju, Jingjuan, Saul, Nadine, Kochan, Cindy, Putschew, Anke, Pu, Yuepu, Yin, Lihong, Steinberg, Christian E. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24776722
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504589
_version_ 1782320455867170816
author Ju, Jingjuan
Saul, Nadine
Kochan, Cindy
Putschew, Anke
Pu, Yuepu
Yin, Lihong
Steinberg, Christian E. W.
author_facet Ju, Jingjuan
Saul, Nadine
Kochan, Cindy
Putschew, Anke
Pu, Yuepu
Yin, Lihong
Steinberg, Christian E. W.
author_sort Ju, Jingjuan
collection PubMed
description In fresh waters cyanobacterial blooms can produce a variety of toxins, such as microcystin variants (MCs) and anatoxin-a (ANA). ANA is a well-known neurotoxin, whereas MCs are hepatotoxic and, to a lesser degree, also neurotoxic. Neurotoxicity applies especially to invertebrates lacking livers. Current standardized neurotoxicity screening methods use rats or mice. However, in order to minimize vertebrate animal experiments as well as experimental time and effort, many investigators have proposed the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as an appropriate invertebrate model. Therefore, four known neurotoxic compounds (positive compounds: chlorpyrifos, abamectin, atropine, and acrylamide) were chosen to verify the expected impacts on autonomic (locomotion, feeding, defecation) and sensory (thermal, chemical, and mechanical sensory perception) functions in C. elegans. This study is another step towards successfully establishing C. elegans as an alternative neurotoxicity model. By using this protocol, anatoxin-a adversely affected locomotive behavior and pharyngeal pumping frequency and, most strongly, chemotactic and thermotactic behavior, whereas MC-LR impacted locomotion, pumping, and mechanical behavior, but not chemical sensory behavior. Environmental samples can also be screened in this simple and fast way for neurotoxic characteristics. The filtrate of a Microcystis aeruginosa culture, known for its hepatotoxicity, also displayed mild neurotoxicity (modulated short-term thermotaxis). These results show the suitability of this assay for environmental cyanotoxin-containing samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4053867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40538672014-06-12 Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test Ju, Jingjuan Saul, Nadine Kochan, Cindy Putschew, Anke Pu, Yuepu Yin, Lihong Steinberg, Christian E. W. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In fresh waters cyanobacterial blooms can produce a variety of toxins, such as microcystin variants (MCs) and anatoxin-a (ANA). ANA is a well-known neurotoxin, whereas MCs are hepatotoxic and, to a lesser degree, also neurotoxic. Neurotoxicity applies especially to invertebrates lacking livers. Current standardized neurotoxicity screening methods use rats or mice. However, in order to minimize vertebrate animal experiments as well as experimental time and effort, many investigators have proposed the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as an appropriate invertebrate model. Therefore, four known neurotoxic compounds (positive compounds: chlorpyrifos, abamectin, atropine, and acrylamide) were chosen to verify the expected impacts on autonomic (locomotion, feeding, defecation) and sensory (thermal, chemical, and mechanical sensory perception) functions in C. elegans. This study is another step towards successfully establishing C. elegans as an alternative neurotoxicity model. By using this protocol, anatoxin-a adversely affected locomotive behavior and pharyngeal pumping frequency and, most strongly, chemotactic and thermotactic behavior, whereas MC-LR impacted locomotion, pumping, and mechanical behavior, but not chemical sensory behavior. Environmental samples can also be screened in this simple and fast way for neurotoxic characteristics. The filtrate of a Microcystis aeruginosa culture, known for its hepatotoxicity, also displayed mild neurotoxicity (modulated short-term thermotaxis). These results show the suitability of this assay for environmental cyanotoxin-containing samples. MDPI 2014-04-25 2014-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4053867/ /pubmed/24776722 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504589 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ju, Jingjuan
Saul, Nadine
Kochan, Cindy
Putschew, Anke
Pu, Yuepu
Yin, Lihong
Steinberg, Christian E. W.
Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test
title Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test
title_full Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test
title_fullStr Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test
title_full_unstemmed Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test
title_short Cyanobacterial Xenobiotics as Evaluated by a Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxicity Screening Test
title_sort cyanobacterial xenobiotics as evaluated by a caenorhabditis elegans neurotoxicity screening test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24776722
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504589
work_keys_str_mv AT jujingjuan cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest
AT saulnadine cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest
AT kochancindy cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest
AT putschewanke cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest
AT puyuepu cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest
AT yinlihong cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest
AT steinbergchristianew cyanobacterialxenobioticsasevaluatedbyacaenorhabditiselegansneurotoxicityscreeningtest