Cargando…

A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems

High quality data and effective data quality assessment are required for accurately evaluating the impact of public health interventions and measuring public health outcomes. Data, data use, and data collection process, as the three dimensions of data quality, all need to be assessed for overall dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Hong, Hailey, David, Wang, Ning, Yu, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24830450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110505170
_version_ 1782320460199886848
author Chen, Hong
Hailey, David
Wang, Ning
Yu, Ping
author_facet Chen, Hong
Hailey, David
Wang, Ning
Yu, Ping
author_sort Chen, Hong
collection PubMed
description High quality data and effective data quality assessment are required for accurately evaluating the impact of public health interventions and measuring public health outcomes. Data, data use, and data collection process, as the three dimensions of data quality, all need to be assessed for overall data quality assessment. We reviewed current data quality assessment methods. The relevant study was identified in major databases and well-known institutional websites. We found the dimension of data was most frequently assessed. Completeness, accuracy, and timeliness were the three most-used attributes among a total of 49 attributes of data quality. The major quantitative assessment methods were descriptive surveys and data audits, whereas the common qualitative assessment methods were interview and documentation review. The limitations of the reviewed studies included inattentiveness to data use and data collection process, inconsistency in the definition of attributes of data quality, failure to address data users’ concerns and a lack of systematic procedures in data quality assessment. This review study is limited by the coverage of the databases and the breadth of public health information systems. Further research could develop consistent data quality definitions and attributes. More research efforts should be given to assess the quality of data use and the quality of data collection process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4053886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40538862014-06-12 A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems Chen, Hong Hailey, David Wang, Ning Yu, Ping Int J Environ Res Public Health Review High quality data and effective data quality assessment are required for accurately evaluating the impact of public health interventions and measuring public health outcomes. Data, data use, and data collection process, as the three dimensions of data quality, all need to be assessed for overall data quality assessment. We reviewed current data quality assessment methods. The relevant study was identified in major databases and well-known institutional websites. We found the dimension of data was most frequently assessed. Completeness, accuracy, and timeliness were the three most-used attributes among a total of 49 attributes of data quality. The major quantitative assessment methods were descriptive surveys and data audits, whereas the common qualitative assessment methods were interview and documentation review. The limitations of the reviewed studies included inattentiveness to data use and data collection process, inconsistency in the definition of attributes of data quality, failure to address data users’ concerns and a lack of systematic procedures in data quality assessment. This review study is limited by the coverage of the databases and the breadth of public health information systems. Further research could develop consistent data quality definitions and attributes. More research efforts should be given to assess the quality of data use and the quality of data collection process. MDPI 2014-05-14 2014-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4053886/ /pubmed/24830450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110505170 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chen, Hong
Hailey, David
Wang, Ning
Yu, Ping
A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems
title A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems
title_full A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems
title_fullStr A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems
title_short A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems
title_sort review of data quality assessment methods for public health information systems
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24830450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110505170
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhong areviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems
AT haileydavid areviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems
AT wangning areviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems
AT yuping areviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems
AT chenhong reviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems
AT haileydavid reviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems
AT wangning reviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems
AT yuping reviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems