Cargando…
A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems
High quality data and effective data quality assessment are required for accurately evaluating the impact of public health interventions and measuring public health outcomes. Data, data use, and data collection process, as the three dimensions of data quality, all need to be assessed for overall dat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24830450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110505170 |
_version_ | 1782320460199886848 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Hong Hailey, David Wang, Ning Yu, Ping |
author_facet | Chen, Hong Hailey, David Wang, Ning Yu, Ping |
author_sort | Chen, Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | High quality data and effective data quality assessment are required for accurately evaluating the impact of public health interventions and measuring public health outcomes. Data, data use, and data collection process, as the three dimensions of data quality, all need to be assessed for overall data quality assessment. We reviewed current data quality assessment methods. The relevant study was identified in major databases and well-known institutional websites. We found the dimension of data was most frequently assessed. Completeness, accuracy, and timeliness were the three most-used attributes among a total of 49 attributes of data quality. The major quantitative assessment methods were descriptive surveys and data audits, whereas the common qualitative assessment methods were interview and documentation review. The limitations of the reviewed studies included inattentiveness to data use and data collection process, inconsistency in the definition of attributes of data quality, failure to address data users’ concerns and a lack of systematic procedures in data quality assessment. This review study is limited by the coverage of the databases and the breadth of public health information systems. Further research could develop consistent data quality definitions and attributes. More research efforts should be given to assess the quality of data use and the quality of data collection process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4053886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40538862014-06-12 A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems Chen, Hong Hailey, David Wang, Ning Yu, Ping Int J Environ Res Public Health Review High quality data and effective data quality assessment are required for accurately evaluating the impact of public health interventions and measuring public health outcomes. Data, data use, and data collection process, as the three dimensions of data quality, all need to be assessed for overall data quality assessment. We reviewed current data quality assessment methods. The relevant study was identified in major databases and well-known institutional websites. We found the dimension of data was most frequently assessed. Completeness, accuracy, and timeliness were the three most-used attributes among a total of 49 attributes of data quality. The major quantitative assessment methods were descriptive surveys and data audits, whereas the common qualitative assessment methods were interview and documentation review. The limitations of the reviewed studies included inattentiveness to data use and data collection process, inconsistency in the definition of attributes of data quality, failure to address data users’ concerns and a lack of systematic procedures in data quality assessment. This review study is limited by the coverage of the databases and the breadth of public health information systems. Further research could develop consistent data quality definitions and attributes. More research efforts should be given to assess the quality of data use and the quality of data collection process. MDPI 2014-05-14 2014-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4053886/ /pubmed/24830450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110505170 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Chen, Hong Hailey, David Wang, Ning Yu, Ping A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems |
title | A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems |
title_full | A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems |
title_fullStr | A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems |
title_short | A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems |
title_sort | review of data quality assessment methods for public health information systems |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24830450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110505170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenhong areviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems AT haileydavid areviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems AT wangning areviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems AT yuping areviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems AT chenhong reviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems AT haileydavid reviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems AT wangning reviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems AT yuping reviewofdataqualityassessmentmethodsforpublichealthinformationsystems |