Cargando…

Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effectiveness of the apical negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and conventional needle irrigation (CI) systems on smear layer (SR) removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted canines were prepared using NiTi rotary files and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmetoglu, Fuat, Keles, Ali, Yalcin, Muhammet, Simsek, Neslihan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966746
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126241
_version_ 1782320490298212352
author Ahmetoglu, Fuat
Keles, Ali
Yalcin, Muhammet
Simsek, Neslihan
author_facet Ahmetoglu, Fuat
Keles, Ali
Yalcin, Muhammet
Simsek, Neslihan
author_sort Ahmetoglu, Fuat
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effectiveness of the apical negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and conventional needle irrigation (CI) systems on smear layer (SR) removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted canines were prepared using NiTi rotary files and subjected to different irrigation regimens: EndoVac with NaOCl (Group 1) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 2); PUI with NaOCl (Group 3) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 4); CI with NaOCl (Group 5) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 6). The roots were split longitudinally. SEM images were taken to evaluate the amount of residual SR. RESULTS: In Groups 1, 3, and 5, there was no removal of SR (P > 0.05). The coronal thirds within Groups 2, 4, and 6 were cleaned completely, but the middle and the apical thirds was achieved partially or completely (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Regardless of which irrigation system was used, the use of NaOCl alone failed to remove the SR. In NaOCl/EDTA combination groups, the SR was removed partially or completely and no statistical significance. This study demonstrated that in order to remove the SR should be used EDTA solution for final irrigation in the root canal, regardless of the technique in each of the three.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4054032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40540322014-06-25 Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study Ahmetoglu, Fuat Keles, Ali Yalcin, Muhammet Simsek, Neslihan Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effectiveness of the apical negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and conventional needle irrigation (CI) systems on smear layer (SR) removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted canines were prepared using NiTi rotary files and subjected to different irrigation regimens: EndoVac with NaOCl (Group 1) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 2); PUI with NaOCl (Group 3) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 4); CI with NaOCl (Group 5) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 6). The roots were split longitudinally. SEM images were taken to evaluate the amount of residual SR. RESULTS: In Groups 1, 3, and 5, there was no removal of SR (P > 0.05). The coronal thirds within Groups 2, 4, and 6 were cleaned completely, but the middle and the apical thirds was achieved partially or completely (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Regardless of which irrigation system was used, the use of NaOCl alone failed to remove the SR. In NaOCl/EDTA combination groups, the SR was removed partially or completely and no statistical significance. This study demonstrated that in order to remove the SR should be used EDTA solution for final irrigation in the root canal, regardless of the technique in each of the three. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4054032/ /pubmed/24966746 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126241 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmetoglu, Fuat
Keles, Ali
Yalcin, Muhammet
Simsek, Neslihan
Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study
title Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_full Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_short Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_sort effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopic study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966746
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126241
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmetoglufuat effectivenessofdifferentirrigationsystemsonsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT kelesali effectivenessofdifferentirrigationsystemsonsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT yalcinmuhammet effectivenessofdifferentirrigationsystemsonsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT simsekneslihan effectivenessofdifferentirrigationsystemsonsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy