Cargando…
Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effectiveness of the apical negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and conventional needle irrigation (CI) systems on smear layer (SR) removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted canines were prepared using NiTi rotary files and s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966746 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126241 |
_version_ | 1782320490298212352 |
---|---|
author | Ahmetoglu, Fuat Keles, Ali Yalcin, Muhammet Simsek, Neslihan |
author_facet | Ahmetoglu, Fuat Keles, Ali Yalcin, Muhammet Simsek, Neslihan |
author_sort | Ahmetoglu, Fuat |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effectiveness of the apical negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and conventional needle irrigation (CI) systems on smear layer (SR) removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted canines were prepared using NiTi rotary files and subjected to different irrigation regimens: EndoVac with NaOCl (Group 1) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 2); PUI with NaOCl (Group 3) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 4); CI with NaOCl (Group 5) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 6). The roots were split longitudinally. SEM images were taken to evaluate the amount of residual SR. RESULTS: In Groups 1, 3, and 5, there was no removal of SR (P > 0.05). The coronal thirds within Groups 2, 4, and 6 were cleaned completely, but the middle and the apical thirds was achieved partially or completely (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Regardless of which irrigation system was used, the use of NaOCl alone failed to remove the SR. In NaOCl/EDTA combination groups, the SR was removed partially or completely and no statistical significance. This study demonstrated that in order to remove the SR should be used EDTA solution for final irrigation in the root canal, regardless of the technique in each of the three. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4054032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40540322014-06-25 Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study Ahmetoglu, Fuat Keles, Ali Yalcin, Muhammet Simsek, Neslihan Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effectiveness of the apical negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and conventional needle irrigation (CI) systems on smear layer (SR) removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted canines were prepared using NiTi rotary files and subjected to different irrigation regimens: EndoVac with NaOCl (Group 1) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 2); PUI with NaOCl (Group 3) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 4); CI with NaOCl (Group 5) or NaOCl/EDTA (Group 6). The roots were split longitudinally. SEM images were taken to evaluate the amount of residual SR. RESULTS: In Groups 1, 3, and 5, there was no removal of SR (P > 0.05). The coronal thirds within Groups 2, 4, and 6 were cleaned completely, but the middle and the apical thirds was achieved partially or completely (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Regardless of which irrigation system was used, the use of NaOCl alone failed to remove the SR. In NaOCl/EDTA combination groups, the SR was removed partially or completely and no statistical significance. This study demonstrated that in order to remove the SR should be used EDTA solution for final irrigation in the root canal, regardless of the technique in each of the three. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4054032/ /pubmed/24966746 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126241 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ahmetoglu, Fuat Keles, Ali Yalcin, Muhammet Simsek, Neslihan Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study |
title | Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study |
title_full | Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study |
title_short | Effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study |
title_sort | effectiveness of different irrigation systems on smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopic study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966746 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.126241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmetoglufuat effectivenessofdifferentirrigationsystemsonsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy AT kelesali effectivenessofdifferentirrigationsystemsonsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy AT yalcinmuhammet effectivenessofdifferentirrigationsystemsonsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy AT simsekneslihan effectivenessofdifferentirrigationsystemsonsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy |