Cargando…

Evaluation of the apical adaptation performance of various root canal instruments

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical root canal adaptation performance of various root canal instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 freshly extracted single-rooted mandibular incisors were used in this study. Coroner parts of all teeth were removed from cemento-enam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ceyhanli, K. Tolga, Turkun, Murat, Erdilek, Necdet, Peskersoy, Cem, Kose, Timur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966727
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119070
_version_ 1782320500653948928
author Ceyhanli, K. Tolga
Turkun, Murat
Erdilek, Necdet
Peskersoy, Cem
Kose, Timur
author_facet Ceyhanli, K. Tolga
Turkun, Murat
Erdilek, Necdet
Peskersoy, Cem
Kose, Timur
author_sort Ceyhanli, K. Tolga
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical root canal adaptation performance of various root canal instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 freshly extracted single-rooted mandibular incisors were used in this study. Coroner parts of all teeth were removed from cemento-enamel junction and root canal of each tooth was explored with a size 8 K-file until the tip of the file was just visible at the apex. Working lengths (WLs) were determined as 1 mm short of these measurements. ProTaper, K-file, profile and hedstroem files were inserted into the root canals of 10 teeth to the WL following the flaring of the coronal and middle thirds. Instruments were fixed in the root canals with acrylic resin. The apical 1 mm of each root tip was ground on wet sandpaper to expose the canal and the instrument at the WL and the apical region of each tooth was examined under stereomicroscope. The stereoscopic images of the teeth were digitized and analyzed with software in order to determine the differences between the areas of root canals and file tips. Result data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test (P = 0.05). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between apical file/root canal areas of the evaluated instruments (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: None of the evaluated instruments performed a perfect adaptation with the apical root canal surface at the WL in mandibular incisors. Therefore, total removal of the debris from the apical canal surface may not be achieved when these filing instruments are used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4054078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40540782014-06-25 Evaluation of the apical adaptation performance of various root canal instruments Ceyhanli, K. Tolga Turkun, Murat Erdilek, Necdet Peskersoy, Cem Kose, Timur Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical root canal adaptation performance of various root canal instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 freshly extracted single-rooted mandibular incisors were used in this study. Coroner parts of all teeth were removed from cemento-enamel junction and root canal of each tooth was explored with a size 8 K-file until the tip of the file was just visible at the apex. Working lengths (WLs) were determined as 1 mm short of these measurements. ProTaper, K-file, profile and hedstroem files were inserted into the root canals of 10 teeth to the WL following the flaring of the coronal and middle thirds. Instruments were fixed in the root canals with acrylic resin. The apical 1 mm of each root tip was ground on wet sandpaper to expose the canal and the instrument at the WL and the apical region of each tooth was examined under stereomicroscope. The stereoscopic images of the teeth were digitized and analyzed with software in order to determine the differences between the areas of root canals and file tips. Result data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test (P = 0.05). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between apical file/root canal areas of the evaluated instruments (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: None of the evaluated instruments performed a perfect adaptation with the apical root canal surface at the WL in mandibular incisors. Therefore, total removal of the debris from the apical canal surface may not be achieved when these filing instruments are used. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4054078/ /pubmed/24966727 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119070 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ceyhanli, K. Tolga
Turkun, Murat
Erdilek, Necdet
Peskersoy, Cem
Kose, Timur
Evaluation of the apical adaptation performance of various root canal instruments
title Evaluation of the apical adaptation performance of various root canal instruments
title_full Evaluation of the apical adaptation performance of various root canal instruments
title_fullStr Evaluation of the apical adaptation performance of various root canal instruments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the apical adaptation performance of various root canal instruments
title_short Evaluation of the apical adaptation performance of various root canal instruments
title_sort evaluation of the apical adaptation performance of various root canal instruments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966727
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119070
work_keys_str_mv AT ceyhanliktolga evaluationoftheapicaladaptationperformanceofvariousrootcanalinstruments
AT turkunmurat evaluationoftheapicaladaptationperformanceofvariousrootcanalinstruments
AT erdileknecdet evaluationoftheapicaladaptationperformanceofvariousrootcanalinstruments
AT peskersoycem evaluationoftheapicaladaptationperformanceofvariousrootcanalinstruments
AT kosetimur evaluationoftheapicaladaptationperformanceofvariousrootcanalinstruments