Cargando…
Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was 2-fold. The first aim was to evaluate the effects of mixing technique (hand-mixing or auto-mixing) on bacterial attachment to polyether impression materials. The second aim was to determine whether bacterial attachment to these materials was affected by length of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119074 |
_version_ | 1782320501115322368 |
---|---|
author | Guler, Umut Budak, Yasemin Ruh, Emrah Ocal, Yesim Canay, Senay Akyon, Yakut |
author_facet | Guler, Umut Budak, Yasemin Ruh, Emrah Ocal, Yesim Canay, Senay Akyon, Yakut |
author_sort | Guler, Umut |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was 2-fold. The first aim was to evaluate the effects of mixing technique (hand-mixing or auto-mixing) on bacterial attachment to polyether impression materials. The second aim was to determine whether bacterial attachment to these materials was affected by length of exposure to disinfection solutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polyether impression material samples (n = 144) were prepared by hand-mixing or auto-mixing. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used in testing. After incubation, the bacterial colonies were counted and then disinfectant solution was applied. The effect of disinfection solution was evaluated just after the polymerization of impression material and 30 min after polymerization. Differences in adherence of bacteria to the samples prepared by hand-mixing and to those prepared by auto-mixing were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. For evaluating the efficiency of the disinfectant, Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test was used. RESULTS: E. coli counts were higher in hand-mixed materials (P < 0.05); no other statistically significant differences were found between hand- and auto-mixed materials. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, significant differences were found between the disinfection procedures (Z > 2.394). CONCLUSION: The methods used for mixing polyether impression material did not affect bacterial attachment to impression surfaces. In contrast, the disinfection procedure greatly affects decontamination of the impression surface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4054080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40540802014-06-25 Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material Guler, Umut Budak, Yasemin Ruh, Emrah Ocal, Yesim Canay, Senay Akyon, Yakut Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was 2-fold. The first aim was to evaluate the effects of mixing technique (hand-mixing or auto-mixing) on bacterial attachment to polyether impression materials. The second aim was to determine whether bacterial attachment to these materials was affected by length of exposure to disinfection solutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polyether impression material samples (n = 144) were prepared by hand-mixing or auto-mixing. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used in testing. After incubation, the bacterial colonies were counted and then disinfectant solution was applied. The effect of disinfection solution was evaluated just after the polymerization of impression material and 30 min after polymerization. Differences in adherence of bacteria to the samples prepared by hand-mixing and to those prepared by auto-mixing were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. For evaluating the efficiency of the disinfectant, Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test was used. RESULTS: E. coli counts were higher in hand-mixed materials (P < 0.05); no other statistically significant differences were found between hand- and auto-mixed materials. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, significant differences were found between the disinfection procedures (Z > 2.394). CONCLUSION: The methods used for mixing polyether impression material did not affect bacterial attachment to impression surfaces. In contrast, the disinfection procedure greatly affects decontamination of the impression surface. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4054080/ /pubmed/24966729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119074 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Guler, Umut Budak, Yasemin Ruh, Emrah Ocal, Yesim Canay, Senay Akyon, Yakut Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material |
title | Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material |
title_full | Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material |
title_fullStr | Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material |
title_short | Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material |
title_sort | effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gulerumut effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial AT budakyasemin effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial AT ruhemrah effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial AT ocalyesim effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial AT canaysenay effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial AT akyonyakut effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial |