Cargando…

Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was 2-fold. The first aim was to evaluate the effects of mixing technique (hand-mixing or auto-mixing) on bacterial attachment to polyether impression materials. The second aim was to determine whether bacterial attachment to these materials was affected by length of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guler, Umut, Budak, Yasemin, Ruh, Emrah, Ocal, Yesim, Canay, Senay, Akyon, Yakut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966729
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119074
_version_ 1782320501115322368
author Guler, Umut
Budak, Yasemin
Ruh, Emrah
Ocal, Yesim
Canay, Senay
Akyon, Yakut
author_facet Guler, Umut
Budak, Yasemin
Ruh, Emrah
Ocal, Yesim
Canay, Senay
Akyon, Yakut
author_sort Guler, Umut
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was 2-fold. The first aim was to evaluate the effects of mixing technique (hand-mixing or auto-mixing) on bacterial attachment to polyether impression materials. The second aim was to determine whether bacterial attachment to these materials was affected by length of exposure to disinfection solutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polyether impression material samples (n = 144) were prepared by hand-mixing or auto-mixing. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used in testing. After incubation, the bacterial colonies were counted and then disinfectant solution was applied. The effect of disinfection solution was evaluated just after the polymerization of impression material and 30 min after polymerization. Differences in adherence of bacteria to the samples prepared by hand-mixing and to those prepared by auto-mixing were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. For evaluating the efficiency of the disinfectant, Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test was used. RESULTS: E. coli counts were higher in hand-mixed materials (P < 0.05); no other statistically significant differences were found between hand- and auto-mixed materials. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, significant differences were found between the disinfection procedures (Z > 2.394). CONCLUSION: The methods used for mixing polyether impression material did not affect bacterial attachment to impression surfaces. In contrast, the disinfection procedure greatly affects decontamination of the impression surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4054080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40540802014-06-25 Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material Guler, Umut Budak, Yasemin Ruh, Emrah Ocal, Yesim Canay, Senay Akyon, Yakut Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was 2-fold. The first aim was to evaluate the effects of mixing technique (hand-mixing or auto-mixing) on bacterial attachment to polyether impression materials. The second aim was to determine whether bacterial attachment to these materials was affected by length of exposure to disinfection solutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polyether impression material samples (n = 144) were prepared by hand-mixing or auto-mixing. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used in testing. After incubation, the bacterial colonies were counted and then disinfectant solution was applied. The effect of disinfection solution was evaluated just after the polymerization of impression material and 30 min after polymerization. Differences in adherence of bacteria to the samples prepared by hand-mixing and to those prepared by auto-mixing were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. For evaluating the efficiency of the disinfectant, Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test was used. RESULTS: E. coli counts were higher in hand-mixed materials (P < 0.05); no other statistically significant differences were found between hand- and auto-mixed materials. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, significant differences were found between the disinfection procedures (Z > 2.394). CONCLUSION: The methods used for mixing polyether impression material did not affect bacterial attachment to impression surfaces. In contrast, the disinfection procedure greatly affects decontamination of the impression surface. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4054080/ /pubmed/24966729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119074 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Guler, Umut
Budak, Yasemin
Ruh, Emrah
Ocal, Yesim
Canay, Senay
Akyon, Yakut
Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material
title Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material
title_full Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material
title_fullStr Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material
title_full_unstemmed Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material
title_short Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material
title_sort effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966729
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119074
work_keys_str_mv AT gulerumut effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial
AT budakyasemin effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial
AT ruhemrah effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial
AT ocalyesim effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial
AT canaysenay effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial
AT akyonyakut effectofmixingtechniquesonbacterialattachmentanddisinfectiontimeofpolyetherimpressionmaterial