Cargando…
Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 standardized Class V cavities were prepared on facial and lingual of 90 extracted human premolar teeth and randomly assigne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966730 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119075 |
_version_ | 1782320501340766208 |
---|---|
author | Karaman, Emel Yazici, A. Ruya Aksoy, Burak Karabulut, Erdem Ozgunaltay, Gul Dayangac, Berrin |
author_facet | Karaman, Emel Yazici, A. Ruya Aksoy, Burak Karabulut, Erdem Ozgunaltay, Gul Dayangac, Berrin |
author_sort | Karaman, Emel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 standardized Class V cavities were prepared on facial and lingual of 90 extracted human premolar teeth and randomly assigned to five groups according to the adhesive systems used (n = 36): Prime and Bond NT (PB), Single Bond (SB), Futura Bond NR, Xeno III (XE) and Adper Prompt-L-Pop (LP). The adhesive groups were then further subdivided into three operator groups according to level of clinical experience (n = 12): An undergraduate student, a research assistant and a faculty member. All cavities were restored with same composite resin. The restored teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5-55°C) then immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin and measured for leakage under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Significant inter-operator variation was found in the enamel margins in the XE group with significantly higher microleakage when used by the undergraduate student (P < 0.05). Although no significant differences in microleakage were found between adhesive systems for the research assistant and faculty member (P > 0.05), significant differences were observed between PB and LP, PB and XE, SB and LP and SB and XE in the enamel margins for the undergraduate student (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Microleakage of adhesive systems is more dependent on interactions between the operator and adhesive material than on the choice of adhesive material. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4054081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40540812014-06-25 Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems Karaman, Emel Yazici, A. Ruya Aksoy, Burak Karabulut, Erdem Ozgunaltay, Gul Dayangac, Berrin Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180 standardized Class V cavities were prepared on facial and lingual of 90 extracted human premolar teeth and randomly assigned to five groups according to the adhesive systems used (n = 36): Prime and Bond NT (PB), Single Bond (SB), Futura Bond NR, Xeno III (XE) and Adper Prompt-L-Pop (LP). The adhesive groups were then further subdivided into three operator groups according to level of clinical experience (n = 12): An undergraduate student, a research assistant and a faculty member. All cavities were restored with same composite resin. The restored teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5-55°C) then immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin and measured for leakage under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Significant inter-operator variation was found in the enamel margins in the XE group with significantly higher microleakage when used by the undergraduate student (P < 0.05). Although no significant differences in microleakage were found between adhesive systems for the research assistant and faculty member (P > 0.05), significant differences were observed between PB and LP, PB and XE, SB and LP and SB and XE in the enamel margins for the undergraduate student (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Microleakage of adhesive systems is more dependent on interactions between the operator and adhesive material than on the choice of adhesive material. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4054081/ /pubmed/24966730 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119075 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Karaman, Emel Yazici, A. Ruya Aksoy, Burak Karabulut, Erdem Ozgunaltay, Gul Dayangac, Berrin Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems |
title | Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems |
title_full | Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems |
title_fullStr | Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems |
title_short | Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems |
title_sort | effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966730 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karamanemel effectofoperatorvariabilityonmicroleakagewithdifferentadhesivesystems AT yaziciaruya effectofoperatorvariabilityonmicroleakagewithdifferentadhesivesystems AT aksoyburak effectofoperatorvariabilityonmicroleakagewithdifferentadhesivesystems AT karabuluterdem effectofoperatorvariabilityonmicroleakagewithdifferentadhesivesystems AT ozgunaltaygul effectofoperatorvariabilityonmicroleakagewithdifferentadhesivesystems AT dayangacberrin effectofoperatorvariabilityonmicroleakagewithdifferentadhesivesystems |