Cargando…

Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the prevalence, distribution, angular position, and depth of third molar impaction in a Turkish orthodontic patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the panoramic radiographs, intraoral photographs, and dental casts of 207 patients (62...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topkara, Ahu, Sari, Zafer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966737
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119084
_version_ 1782320502951378944
author Topkara, Ahu
Sari, Zafer
author_facet Topkara, Ahu
Sari, Zafer
author_sort Topkara, Ahu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the prevalence, distribution, angular position, and depth of third molar impaction in a Turkish orthodontic patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the panoramic radiographs, intraoral photographs, and dental casts of 207 patients (62 men and 145 women; age 20-39 years) who had undergone orthodontic treatment at a university department of orthodontics for impacted third molars (ITMs). A comprehensive chart review of all subjects was conducted. Patient and treatment-related data were recorded in a digital database for comparative analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of ITMs was 54.1%, and no statistically significant gender differences were evident (61.3% in men and 51.0% in women; P = 0.23). The frequency of maxillary ITMs was 49.3% (148 of 300 teeth) while that of mandibular ITMs was 50.7% (152 of 300 teeth). The most frequently observed angulations of impaction were mesioangular for the mandible (65.1%), and distoangular for the maxilla (64.2%). Of all the ITMs analysed, 61% were partially buried in bone and 39% were completely buried. CONCLUSIONS: Third molar impaction was evident in 54.1% of a group of Turkish orthodontic patients aged 20-39 years, and there was no statistically significant gender bias. Mesioangular and distoangular inclinations were the most common in the mandible and the maxilla, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4054088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40540882014-06-25 Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions Topkara, Ahu Sari, Zafer Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the prevalence, distribution, angular position, and depth of third molar impaction in a Turkish orthodontic patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the panoramic radiographs, intraoral photographs, and dental casts of 207 patients (62 men and 145 women; age 20-39 years) who had undergone orthodontic treatment at a university department of orthodontics for impacted third molars (ITMs). A comprehensive chart review of all subjects was conducted. Patient and treatment-related data were recorded in a digital database for comparative analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of ITMs was 54.1%, and no statistically significant gender differences were evident (61.3% in men and 51.0% in women; P = 0.23). The frequency of maxillary ITMs was 49.3% (148 of 300 teeth) while that of mandibular ITMs was 50.7% (152 of 300 teeth). The most frequently observed angulations of impaction were mesioangular for the mandible (65.1%), and distoangular for the maxilla (64.2%). Of all the ITMs analysed, 61% were partially buried in bone and 39% were completely buried. CONCLUSIONS: Third molar impaction was evident in 54.1% of a group of Turkish orthodontic patients aged 20-39 years, and there was no statistically significant gender bias. Mesioangular and distoangular inclinations were the most common in the mandible and the maxilla, respectively. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4054088/ /pubmed/24966737 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119084 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Topkara, Ahu
Sari, Zafer
Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions
title Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions
title_full Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions
title_fullStr Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions
title_short Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions
title_sort investigation of third molar impaction in turkish orthodontic patients: prevalence, depth and angular positions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966737
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119084
work_keys_str_mv AT topkaraahu investigationofthirdmolarimpactioninturkishorthodonticpatientsprevalencedepthandangularpositions
AT sarizafer investigationofthirdmolarimpactioninturkishorthodonticpatientsprevalencedepthandangularpositions