Cargando…

Modelling Arterial Pressure Waveforms Using Gaussian Functions and Two-Stage Particle Swarm Optimizer

Changes of arterial pressure waveform characteristics have been accepted as risk indicators of cardiovascular diseases. Waveform modelling using Gaussian functions has been used to decompose arterial pressure pulses into different numbers of subwaves and hence quantify waveform characteristics. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chengyu, Zhuang, Tao, Zhao, Lina, Chang, Faliang, Liu, Changchun, Wei, Shoushui, Li, Qiqiang, Zheng, Dingchang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24967415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/923260
_version_ 1782320544558874624
author Liu, Chengyu
Zhuang, Tao
Zhao, Lina
Chang, Faliang
Liu, Changchun
Wei, Shoushui
Li, Qiqiang
Zheng, Dingchang
author_facet Liu, Chengyu
Zhuang, Tao
Zhao, Lina
Chang, Faliang
Liu, Changchun
Wei, Shoushui
Li, Qiqiang
Zheng, Dingchang
author_sort Liu, Chengyu
collection PubMed
description Changes of arterial pressure waveform characteristics have been accepted as risk indicators of cardiovascular diseases. Waveform modelling using Gaussian functions has been used to decompose arterial pressure pulses into different numbers of subwaves and hence quantify waveform characteristics. However, the fitting accuracy and computation efficiency of current modelling approaches need to be improved. This study aimed to develop a novel two-stage particle swarm optimizer (TSPSO) to determine optimal parameters of Gaussian functions. The evaluation was performed on carotid and radial artery pressure waveforms (CAPW and RAPW) which were simultaneously recorded from twenty normal volunteers. The fitting accuracy and calculation efficiency of our TSPSO were compared with three published optimization methods: the Nelder-Mead, the modified PSO (MPSO), and the dynamic multiswarm particle swarm optimizer (DMS-PSO). The results showed that TSPSO achieved the best fitting accuracy with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.1% for CAPW and 1.0% for RAPW, in comparison with 4.2% and 4.1% for Nelder-Mead, 2.0% and 1.9% for MPSO, and 1.2% and 1.1% for DMS-PSO. In addition, to achieve target MAE of 2.0%, the computation time of TSPSO was only 1.5 s, which was only 20% and 30% of that for MPSO and DMS-PSO, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4054788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40547882014-06-25 Modelling Arterial Pressure Waveforms Using Gaussian Functions and Two-Stage Particle Swarm Optimizer Liu, Chengyu Zhuang, Tao Zhao, Lina Chang, Faliang Liu, Changchun Wei, Shoushui Li, Qiqiang Zheng, Dingchang Biomed Res Int Research Article Changes of arterial pressure waveform characteristics have been accepted as risk indicators of cardiovascular diseases. Waveform modelling using Gaussian functions has been used to decompose arterial pressure pulses into different numbers of subwaves and hence quantify waveform characteristics. However, the fitting accuracy and computation efficiency of current modelling approaches need to be improved. This study aimed to develop a novel two-stage particle swarm optimizer (TSPSO) to determine optimal parameters of Gaussian functions. The evaluation was performed on carotid and radial artery pressure waveforms (CAPW and RAPW) which were simultaneously recorded from twenty normal volunteers. The fitting accuracy and calculation efficiency of our TSPSO were compared with three published optimization methods: the Nelder-Mead, the modified PSO (MPSO), and the dynamic multiswarm particle swarm optimizer (DMS-PSO). The results showed that TSPSO achieved the best fitting accuracy with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.1% for CAPW and 1.0% for RAPW, in comparison with 4.2% and 4.1% for Nelder-Mead, 2.0% and 1.9% for MPSO, and 1.2% and 1.1% for DMS-PSO. In addition, to achieve target MAE of 2.0%, the computation time of TSPSO was only 1.5 s, which was only 20% and 30% of that for MPSO and DMS-PSO, respectively. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4054788/ /pubmed/24967415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/923260 Text en Copyright © 2014 Chengyu Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Chengyu
Zhuang, Tao
Zhao, Lina
Chang, Faliang
Liu, Changchun
Wei, Shoushui
Li, Qiqiang
Zheng, Dingchang
Modelling Arterial Pressure Waveforms Using Gaussian Functions and Two-Stage Particle Swarm Optimizer
title Modelling Arterial Pressure Waveforms Using Gaussian Functions and Two-Stage Particle Swarm Optimizer
title_full Modelling Arterial Pressure Waveforms Using Gaussian Functions and Two-Stage Particle Swarm Optimizer
title_fullStr Modelling Arterial Pressure Waveforms Using Gaussian Functions and Two-Stage Particle Swarm Optimizer
title_full_unstemmed Modelling Arterial Pressure Waveforms Using Gaussian Functions and Two-Stage Particle Swarm Optimizer
title_short Modelling Arterial Pressure Waveforms Using Gaussian Functions and Two-Stage Particle Swarm Optimizer
title_sort modelling arterial pressure waveforms using gaussian functions and two-stage particle swarm optimizer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24967415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/923260
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchengyu modellingarterialpressurewaveformsusinggaussianfunctionsandtwostageparticleswarmoptimizer
AT zhuangtao modellingarterialpressurewaveformsusinggaussianfunctionsandtwostageparticleswarmoptimizer
AT zhaolina modellingarterialpressurewaveformsusinggaussianfunctionsandtwostageparticleswarmoptimizer
AT changfaliang modellingarterialpressurewaveformsusinggaussianfunctionsandtwostageparticleswarmoptimizer
AT liuchangchun modellingarterialpressurewaveformsusinggaussianfunctionsandtwostageparticleswarmoptimizer
AT weishoushui modellingarterialpressurewaveformsusinggaussianfunctionsandtwostageparticleswarmoptimizer
AT liqiqiang modellingarterialpressurewaveformsusinggaussianfunctionsandtwostageparticleswarmoptimizer
AT zhengdingchang modellingarterialpressurewaveformsusinggaussianfunctionsandtwostageparticleswarmoptimizer