Cargando…

Difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the BONAMI trial

INTRODUCTION: Although autologous bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), trials reported mixed results. In the BONAMI trial, active smoking reduced cardiac function recovery after reperfused AMI. Therefore, we hypothesized that vari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamirault, Guillaume, Susen, Sophie, Forest, Virginie, Hemont, Caroline, Parini, Angelo, Corvoisier, Philippe Le, Piot, Christophe, Richard, Marie-Jeanne, Delasalle, Béatrice, Rouard, Hélène, Sportouch, Catherine, Persoons, Virginie, Van Belle, Eric, Roncalli, Jérôme, Lemarchand, Patricia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/scrt382
_version_ 1782320572832677888
author Lamirault, Guillaume
Susen, Sophie
Forest, Virginie
Hemont, Caroline
Parini, Angelo
Corvoisier, Philippe Le
Piot, Christophe
Richard, Marie-Jeanne
Delasalle, Béatrice
Rouard, Hélène
Sportouch, Catherine
Persoons, Virginie
Van Belle, Eric
Roncalli, Jérôme
Lemarchand, Patricia
author_facet Lamirault, Guillaume
Susen, Sophie
Forest, Virginie
Hemont, Caroline
Parini, Angelo
Corvoisier, Philippe Le
Piot, Christophe
Richard, Marie-Jeanne
Delasalle, Béatrice
Rouard, Hélène
Sportouch, Catherine
Persoons, Virginie
Van Belle, Eric
Roncalli, Jérôme
Lemarchand, Patricia
author_sort Lamirault, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although autologous bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), trials reported mixed results. In the BONAMI trial, active smoking reduced cardiac function recovery after reperfused AMI. Therefore, we hypothesized that variability in the functionality of BMCs retrieved from patients with cardiovascular risk factors may partly explain these mixed results. We investigated the characteristics of progenitor cells in active smokers and non-smokers with AMI and their potential impact on BMC therapy efficacy. METHODS: Bone marrow and blood samples from 54 smoking and 47 non-smoking patients enrolled in the BONAMI cell therapy trial were analyzed. RESULTS: The white BMC and CD45dimCD34+ cell numbers were higher in active smokers (P = 0.001, P = 0.03, respectively). In marked contrast, either bone marrow or blood endothelial progenitor CD45dimCD34 + KDR + cells (EPCs) were decreased in active smokers (P = 0.005, P = 0.04, respectively). Importantly, a multivariate analysis including cardiovascular risk factors confirmed the association between active smoking and lower EPC number in bone marrow (P = 0.04) and blood (P = 0.04). Furthermore, baseline circulating EPC count predicted infarct size decrease at three months post-AMI in non-smokers (P = 0.01) but not in active smokers. Interestingly, baseline circulating EPCs were no longer predictive of cardiac function improvement in the BMC therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that circulating EPCs play an important role in cardiac repair post-AMI only in non-smokers and that active smoking-associated EPC alterations may participate in the impairment of cardiac function recovery observed in smokers after AMI, an effect that was overridden by BMC therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4054959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40549592014-06-13 Difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the BONAMI trial Lamirault, Guillaume Susen, Sophie Forest, Virginie Hemont, Caroline Parini, Angelo Corvoisier, Philippe Le Piot, Christophe Richard, Marie-Jeanne Delasalle, Béatrice Rouard, Hélène Sportouch, Catherine Persoons, Virginie Van Belle, Eric Roncalli, Jérôme Lemarchand, Patricia Stem Cell Res Ther Research INTRODUCTION: Although autologous bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), trials reported mixed results. In the BONAMI trial, active smoking reduced cardiac function recovery after reperfused AMI. Therefore, we hypothesized that variability in the functionality of BMCs retrieved from patients with cardiovascular risk factors may partly explain these mixed results. We investigated the characteristics of progenitor cells in active smokers and non-smokers with AMI and their potential impact on BMC therapy efficacy. METHODS: Bone marrow and blood samples from 54 smoking and 47 non-smoking patients enrolled in the BONAMI cell therapy trial were analyzed. RESULTS: The white BMC and CD45dimCD34+ cell numbers were higher in active smokers (P = 0.001, P = 0.03, respectively). In marked contrast, either bone marrow or blood endothelial progenitor CD45dimCD34 + KDR + cells (EPCs) were decreased in active smokers (P = 0.005, P = 0.04, respectively). Importantly, a multivariate analysis including cardiovascular risk factors confirmed the association between active smoking and lower EPC number in bone marrow (P = 0.04) and blood (P = 0.04). Furthermore, baseline circulating EPC count predicted infarct size decrease at three months post-AMI in non-smokers (P = 0.01) but not in active smokers. Interestingly, baseline circulating EPCs were no longer predictive of cardiac function improvement in the BMC therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that circulating EPCs play an important role in cardiac repair post-AMI only in non-smokers and that active smoking-associated EPC alterations may participate in the impairment of cardiac function recovery observed in smokers after AMI, an effect that was overridden by BMC therapy. BioMed Central 2013-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4054959/ /pubmed/24423369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/scrt382 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lamirault et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lamirault, Guillaume
Susen, Sophie
Forest, Virginie
Hemont, Caroline
Parini, Angelo
Corvoisier, Philippe Le
Piot, Christophe
Richard, Marie-Jeanne
Delasalle, Béatrice
Rouard, Hélène
Sportouch, Catherine
Persoons, Virginie
Van Belle, Eric
Roncalli, Jérôme
Lemarchand, Patricia
Difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the BONAMI trial
title Difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the BONAMI trial
title_full Difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the BONAMI trial
title_fullStr Difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the BONAMI trial
title_full_unstemmed Difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the BONAMI trial
title_short Difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the BONAMI trial
title_sort difference in mobilization of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction in smoking versus non-smoking patients: insights from the bonami trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/scrt382
work_keys_str_mv AT lamiraultguillaume differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT susensophie differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT forestvirginie differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT hemontcaroline differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT pariniangelo differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT corvoisierphilippele differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT piotchristophe differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT richardmariejeanne differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT delasallebeatrice differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT rouardhelene differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT sportouchcatherine differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT persoonsvirginie differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT vanbelleeric differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT roncallijerome differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial
AT lemarchandpatricia differenceinmobilizationofprogenitorcellsaftermyocardialinfarctioninsmokingversusnonsmokingpatientsinsightsfromthebonamitrial