Cargando…

Calibration of self-report tools for physical activity research: the Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAQ)

BACKGROUND: The utility of self-report measures of physical activity (PA) in youth can be greatly enhanced by calibrating self-report output against objectively measured PA data. This study demonstrates the potential of calibrating self-report output against objectively measured physical activity (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saint-Maurice, Pedro F, Welk, Gregory J, Beyler, Nicholas K, Bartee, Roderick T, Heelan, Kate A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-461
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The utility of self-report measures of physical activity (PA) in youth can be greatly enhanced by calibrating self-report output against objectively measured PA data. This study demonstrates the potential of calibrating self-report output against objectively measured physical activity (PA) in youth by using a commonly used self-report tool called the Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAQ). METHODS: A total of 148 participants (grades 4 through 12) from 9 schools (during the 2009–2010 school year) wore an Actigraph accelerometer for 7 days and then completed the PAQ. Multiple linear regression modeling was used on 70% of the available sample to develop a calibration equation and this was cross validated on an independent sample of participants (30% of sample). RESULTS: A calibration model with age, gender, and PAQ scores explained 40% of the variance in values for the percentage of time in moderate-to-vigorous PA ((%)MVPA) measured from the accelerometers ((%)MVPA = 14.56 - (sex*0.98) - (0.84*age) + (1.01*PAQ)). When tested on an independent, hold-out sample, the model estimated (%)MVPA values that were highly correlated with the recorded accelerometer values (r = .63) and there was no significant difference between the estimated and recorded activity values (mean diff. = 25.3 ± 18.1 min; p = .17). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the calibrated PAQ may be a valid alternative tool to activity monitoring instruments for estimating (%)MVPA in groups of youth.