Cargando…

How do physicians decide to treat: an empirical evaluation of the threshold model

BACKGROUND: According to the threshold model, when faced with a decision under diagnostic uncertainty, physicians should administer treatment if the probability of disease is above a specified threshold and withhold treatment otherwise. The objectives of the present study are to a) evaluate if physi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Djulbegovic, Benjamin, Elqayam, Shira, Reljic, Tea, Hozo, Iztok, Miladinovic, Branko, Tsalatsanis, Athanasios, Kumar, Ambuj, Beckstead, Jason, Taylor, Stephanie, Cannon-Bowers, Janice
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2014
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24903517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-47

Ejemplares similares

Thinking Styles and Regret in Physicians
por: Djulbegovic, Mia, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Dual Processing Model for Medical Decision-Making: An Extension to Diagnostic Testing
por: Tsalatsanis, Athanasios, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Instrumental variable meta-analysis of individual patient data: application to adjust for treatment non-compliance
por: Miladinovic, Branko, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Dual processing model of medical decision-making
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Expected utility versus expected regret theory versions of decision curve analysis do generate different results when treatment effects are taken into account
por: Hozo, Iztok, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A regret theory approach to decision curve analysis: A novel method for eliciting decision makers' preferences and decision-making
por: Tsalatsanis, Athanasios, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients
por: Tsalatsanis, Athanasios, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

A Social Network Analysis of Treatment Discoveries in Cancer
por: Tsalatsanis, Athanasios, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Treatment Success in Cancer: Industry Compared to Publicly Sponsored Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Benchmarks for detecting ‘breakthroughs’ in clinical trials: empirical assessment of the probability of large treatment effects using kernel density estimation
por: Miladinovic, Branko, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The threshold model revisited
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evolution of Treatment Regimens in Multiple Myeloma: A Social Network Analysis
por: Mahony, Helen, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision‐making
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Relationship between clinical trials and disease burden of India: A cross-sectional study
por: Kaur, Rimplejeet, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Rationality, practice variation and person‐centred health policy: a threshold hypothesis
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

When Should Potentially False Research Findings Be Considered Acceptable?
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Effect of Initial Conditions on Reproducibility of Scientific Research
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

When is it rational to participate in a clinical trial? A game theory approach incorporating trust, regret and guilt
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
por: Hozo, Stela Pudar, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk
por: Sinkey, Rachel G., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Wao, Hesborn, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Rational decision making in medicine: Implications for overuse and underuse
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Treatment targeted at underlying disease versus palliative care in terminally ill patients: a systematic review
por: Reljic, Tea, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evidence, values, and masks for control of COVID-19
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evidence, values, and masks for control of COVID-19: 2 years later
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A Flexible Alternative to the Cox Proportional Hazards Model for Assessing the Prognostic Accuracy of Hospice Patient Survival
por: Miladinovic, Branko, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Federal Funding and Citation Metrics of US Biomedical Researchers, 1996 to 2022
por: Ioannidis, John P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis
por: Hozo, Iztok, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Comparative efficacy of tandem autologous versus autologous followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Bedaquiline versus placebo for management of multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis: A systematic review
por: Charan, Jaykaran, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Author Reply
por: Charan, Jaykaran, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Activating clinical trials: a process improvement approach
por: Martinez, Diego A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Physiological Plausibility and Boundary Conditions of Theories of Risk Sensitivity
por: Marchiori, Davide, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Editorial: From Is to Ought: The Place of Normative Models in the Study of Human Thought
por: Elqayam, Shira, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Rough set theory based prognostic classification models for hospice referral
por: Gil-Herrera, Eleazar, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluation of a fast‐and‐frugal clinical decision algorithm (‘pathways’) on clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 treated with anticoagulants
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A new method for determining physician decision thresholds using empiric, uncertain recommendations
por: Boland, Michael V, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Endothelial glycocalyx-associated molecules as potential serological markers for sepsis-associated encephalopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Baby, Sheon, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

How to decide intervention thresholds based on FRAX in central south Chinese postmenopausal women
por: Zhang, Zhimin, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_9v1j01tg5c6dl282ues5fj0l7a