Cargando…

Comparison of Anterior Corneal Curvature Measurements Using a Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and Topcon Auto Kerato-Refractometer

Purpose. To compare anterior corneal keratometry (K) measurements taken by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer and an auto kerato-refractometer. Methods. Sixty-four normal eyes underwent keratometric measurements with both devices. The repeatability of the auto kerato-refractometer measurements was assessed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiaogang, Dong, Jing, Wu, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24967095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/140628
_version_ 1782320697373097984
author Wang, Xiaogang
Dong, Jing
Wu, Qiang
author_facet Wang, Xiaogang
Dong, Jing
Wu, Qiang
author_sort Wang, Xiaogang
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To compare anterior corneal keratometry (K) measurements taken by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer and an auto kerato-refractometer. Methods. Sixty-four normal eyes underwent keratometric measurements with both devices. The repeatability of the auto kerato-refractometer measurements was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (COV). The interdevice agreement was evaluated using the Bland-Altman analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient, and paired two-tailed t-test. Results. The COV of the flat K and steep K measurements taken by the auto kerato-refractometer were 0.21% and 0.29%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the steep K and average K measurements for the Topcon and Galilei devices (P = 0.475, and P = 0.137, resp.). The Galilei flat K values were lower than those of the Topcon (P = 0.002). Both of the instruments showed good agreement for all anterior corneal keratometric values. There was a significant linear correlation between the Galilei and Topcon devices for the flat K (r = 0.989, P < 0.0001), steep K (r = 0.987, P < 0.0001), and average K values (r = 0.994, P < 0.0001). Conclusions. The anterior corneal flat keratometric values were not interchangeable between the Galilei and Topcon devices. However, the measurements of the two instruments showed significant linear correlation with each other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4055652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40556522014-06-25 Comparison of Anterior Corneal Curvature Measurements Using a Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and Topcon Auto Kerato-Refractometer Wang, Xiaogang Dong, Jing Wu, Qiang J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To compare anterior corneal keratometry (K) measurements taken by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer and an auto kerato-refractometer. Methods. Sixty-four normal eyes underwent keratometric measurements with both devices. The repeatability of the auto kerato-refractometer measurements was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (COV). The interdevice agreement was evaluated using the Bland-Altman analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient, and paired two-tailed t-test. Results. The COV of the flat K and steep K measurements taken by the auto kerato-refractometer were 0.21% and 0.29%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the steep K and average K measurements for the Topcon and Galilei devices (P = 0.475, and P = 0.137, resp.). The Galilei flat K values were lower than those of the Topcon (P = 0.002). Both of the instruments showed good agreement for all anterior corneal keratometric values. There was a significant linear correlation between the Galilei and Topcon devices for the flat K (r = 0.989, P < 0.0001), steep K (r = 0.987, P < 0.0001), and average K values (r = 0.994, P < 0.0001). Conclusions. The anterior corneal flat keratometric values were not interchangeable between the Galilei and Topcon devices. However, the measurements of the two instruments showed significant linear correlation with each other. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4055652/ /pubmed/24967095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/140628 Text en Copyright © 2014 Xiaogang Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Xiaogang
Dong, Jing
Wu, Qiang
Comparison of Anterior Corneal Curvature Measurements Using a Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and Topcon Auto Kerato-Refractometer
title Comparison of Anterior Corneal Curvature Measurements Using a Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and Topcon Auto Kerato-Refractometer
title_full Comparison of Anterior Corneal Curvature Measurements Using a Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and Topcon Auto Kerato-Refractometer
title_fullStr Comparison of Anterior Corneal Curvature Measurements Using a Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and Topcon Auto Kerato-Refractometer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Anterior Corneal Curvature Measurements Using a Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and Topcon Auto Kerato-Refractometer
title_short Comparison of Anterior Corneal Curvature Measurements Using a Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and Topcon Auto Kerato-Refractometer
title_sort comparison of anterior corneal curvature measurements using a galilei dual scheimpflug analyzer and topcon auto kerato-refractometer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24967095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/140628
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiaogang comparisonofanteriorcornealcurvaturemeasurementsusingagalileidualscheimpfluganalyzerandtopconautokeratorefractometer
AT dongjing comparisonofanteriorcornealcurvaturemeasurementsusingagalileidualscheimpfluganalyzerandtopconautokeratorefractometer
AT wuqiang comparisonofanteriorcornealcurvaturemeasurementsusingagalileidualscheimpfluganalyzerandtopconautokeratorefractometer