Cargando…
Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is commonly used to reduce pain during labour despite contradictory results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture with manual stimulation and acupuncture with combined manual and electrical stimulation (electro-acupuncture) compared with stand...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24913704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-187 |
_version_ | 1782320729463717888 |
---|---|
author | Vixner, Linda Schytt, Erica Stener-Victorin, Elisabet Waldenström, Ulla Pettersson, Hans Mårtensson, Lena B |
author_facet | Vixner, Linda Schytt, Erica Stener-Victorin, Elisabet Waldenström, Ulla Pettersson, Hans Mårtensson, Lena B |
author_sort | Vixner, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is commonly used to reduce pain during labour despite contradictory results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture with manual stimulation and acupuncture with combined manual and electrical stimulation (electro-acupuncture) compared with standard care in reducing labour pain. Our hypothesis was that both acupuncture stimulation techniques were more effective than standard care, and that electro-acupuncture was most effective. METHODS: A longitudinal randomised controlled trial. The recruitment of participants took place at the admission to the labour ward between November 2008 and October 2011 at two Swedish hospitals . 303 nulliparous women with normal pregnancies were randomised to: 40 minutes of manual acupuncture (MA), electro-acupuncture (EA), or standard care without acupuncture (SC). Primary outcome: labour pain, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes: relaxation, use of obstetric pain relief during labour and post-partum assessments of labour pain. The sample size calculation was based on the primary outcome and a difference of 15 mm on VAS was regarded as clinically relevant, this gave 101 in each group, including a total of 303 women. RESULTS: Mean estimated pain scores on VAS (SC: 69.0, MA: 66.4 and EA: 68.5), adjusted for: treatment, age, education, and time from baseline, with no interactions did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: mean difference 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7-6.9 and SC vs EA: mean difference 0.6 [95% CI] -3.6-4.8). Fewer number of women in the EA group used epidural analgesia (46%) than women in the MA group (61%) and SC group (70%) (EA vs SC: odds ratio [OR] 0.35; [95% CI] 0.19-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture does not reduce women’s experience of labour pain, neither with manual stimulation nor with combined manual and electrical stimulation. However, fewer women in the EA group used epidural analgesia thus indicating that the effect of acupuncture with electrical stimulation may be underestimated. These findings were obtained in a context with free access to other forms of pain relief. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01197950. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4055800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40558002014-06-14 Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial Vixner, Linda Schytt, Erica Stener-Victorin, Elisabet Waldenström, Ulla Pettersson, Hans Mårtensson, Lena B BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is commonly used to reduce pain during labour despite contradictory results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture with manual stimulation and acupuncture with combined manual and electrical stimulation (electro-acupuncture) compared with standard care in reducing labour pain. Our hypothesis was that both acupuncture stimulation techniques were more effective than standard care, and that electro-acupuncture was most effective. METHODS: A longitudinal randomised controlled trial. The recruitment of participants took place at the admission to the labour ward between November 2008 and October 2011 at two Swedish hospitals . 303 nulliparous women with normal pregnancies were randomised to: 40 minutes of manual acupuncture (MA), electro-acupuncture (EA), or standard care without acupuncture (SC). Primary outcome: labour pain, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes: relaxation, use of obstetric pain relief during labour and post-partum assessments of labour pain. The sample size calculation was based on the primary outcome and a difference of 15 mm on VAS was regarded as clinically relevant, this gave 101 in each group, including a total of 303 women. RESULTS: Mean estimated pain scores on VAS (SC: 69.0, MA: 66.4 and EA: 68.5), adjusted for: treatment, age, education, and time from baseline, with no interactions did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: mean difference 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7-6.9 and SC vs EA: mean difference 0.6 [95% CI] -3.6-4.8). Fewer number of women in the EA group used epidural analgesia (46%) than women in the MA group (61%) and SC group (70%) (EA vs SC: odds ratio [OR] 0.35; [95% CI] 0.19-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture does not reduce women’s experience of labour pain, neither with manual stimulation nor with combined manual and electrical stimulation. However, fewer women in the EA group used epidural analgesia thus indicating that the effect of acupuncture with electrical stimulation may be underestimated. These findings were obtained in a context with free access to other forms of pain relief. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01197950. BioMed Central 2014-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4055800/ /pubmed/24913704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-187 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vixner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vixner, Linda Schytt, Erica Stener-Victorin, Elisabet Waldenström, Ulla Pettersson, Hans Mårtensson, Lena B Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial |
title | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24913704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vixnerlinda acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainalongitudinalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schytterica acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainalongitudinalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stenervictorinelisabet acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainalongitudinalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT waldenstromulla acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainalongitudinalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT petterssonhans acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainalongitudinalrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT martenssonlenab acupuncturewithmanualandelectricalstimulationforlabourpainalongitudinalrandomisedcontrolledtrial |