Cargando…

Conditioning of the abdominal cavity reduces tumor implantation in a laparoscopic mouse model

PURPOSE: The addition of 4 % O(2) and 10 % N(2)O to the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum (PP), together with slight cooling and humidification (conditioning), contributes to reducing adhesions by preventing mesothelial damage. We investigated the effect of peritoneal damage during laparoscopy on tumor implant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binda, Maria Mercedes, Corona, Roberta, Amant, Frederic, Koninckx, Philippe Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24452508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0832-5
_version_ 1782320737643659264
author Binda, Maria Mercedes
Corona, Roberta
Amant, Frederic
Koninckx, Philippe Robert
author_facet Binda, Maria Mercedes
Corona, Roberta
Amant, Frederic
Koninckx, Philippe Robert
author_sort Binda, Maria Mercedes
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The addition of 4 % O(2) and 10 % N(2)O to the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum (PP), together with slight cooling and humidification (conditioning), contributes to reducing adhesions by preventing mesothelial damage. We investigated the effect of peritoneal damage during laparoscopy on tumor implantation. METHODS: In Experiment 1, different tumor cell concentrations were injected into control mice without PP and into mice with 60-min dry CO(2)PP (mesothelial damage). In Experiment 2, tumor cells were injected into control mice (group I) and in mice with mesothelial damage (group II). In groups III to VI, mesothelial damage was decreased by adding humidification, humidification + 10 % N(2)O, humidification + 10 % N(2)O + 4 % O(2), and conditioning, respectively. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, the tumors increased with the number of cells injected and with mesothelial damage in the abdominal cavity (p = 0.018) and abdominal wall (p < 0.0001). Experiment 2 confirmed that 60 min of dry CO(2)PP increased the number of tumors in the abdominal cavity and wall (p = 0.026 and p = 0.003, respectively). The number of tumors was decreased in the abdominal cavity by conditioning (p = 0.030) and in the abdominal wall using humidified CO(2) (p = 0.032) or conditioning (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor implantation was enhanced by peritoneal damage (60 min of dry CO(2)PP and desiccation), but this was prevented by conditioning. If confirmed in humans, conditioning would become important for oncologic surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4055846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40558462014-06-18 Conditioning of the abdominal cavity reduces tumor implantation in a laparoscopic mouse model Binda, Maria Mercedes Corona, Roberta Amant, Frederic Koninckx, Philippe Robert Surg Today Original Article PURPOSE: The addition of 4 % O(2) and 10 % N(2)O to the CO(2) pneumoperitoneum (PP), together with slight cooling and humidification (conditioning), contributes to reducing adhesions by preventing mesothelial damage. We investigated the effect of peritoneal damage during laparoscopy on tumor implantation. METHODS: In Experiment 1, different tumor cell concentrations were injected into control mice without PP and into mice with 60-min dry CO(2)PP (mesothelial damage). In Experiment 2, tumor cells were injected into control mice (group I) and in mice with mesothelial damage (group II). In groups III to VI, mesothelial damage was decreased by adding humidification, humidification + 10 % N(2)O, humidification + 10 % N(2)O + 4 % O(2), and conditioning, respectively. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, the tumors increased with the number of cells injected and with mesothelial damage in the abdominal cavity (p = 0.018) and abdominal wall (p < 0.0001). Experiment 2 confirmed that 60 min of dry CO(2)PP increased the number of tumors in the abdominal cavity and wall (p = 0.026 and p = 0.003, respectively). The number of tumors was decreased in the abdominal cavity by conditioning (p = 0.030) and in the abdominal wall using humidified CO(2) (p = 0.032) or conditioning (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor implantation was enhanced by peritoneal damage (60 min of dry CO(2)PP and desiccation), but this was prevented by conditioning. If confirmed in humans, conditioning would become important for oncologic surgery. Springer Japan 2014-01-23 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4055846/ /pubmed/24452508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0832-5 Text en © Springer Japan 2014
spellingShingle Original Article
Binda, Maria Mercedes
Corona, Roberta
Amant, Frederic
Koninckx, Philippe Robert
Conditioning of the abdominal cavity reduces tumor implantation in a laparoscopic mouse model
title Conditioning of the abdominal cavity reduces tumor implantation in a laparoscopic mouse model
title_full Conditioning of the abdominal cavity reduces tumor implantation in a laparoscopic mouse model
title_fullStr Conditioning of the abdominal cavity reduces tumor implantation in a laparoscopic mouse model
title_full_unstemmed Conditioning of the abdominal cavity reduces tumor implantation in a laparoscopic mouse model
title_short Conditioning of the abdominal cavity reduces tumor implantation in a laparoscopic mouse model
title_sort conditioning of the abdominal cavity reduces tumor implantation in a laparoscopic mouse model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24452508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0832-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bindamariamercedes conditioningoftheabdominalcavityreducestumorimplantationinalaparoscopicmousemodel
AT coronaroberta conditioningoftheabdominalcavityreducestumorimplantationinalaparoscopicmousemodel
AT amantfrederic conditioningoftheabdominalcavityreducestumorimplantationinalaparoscopicmousemodel
AT koninckxphilipperobert conditioningoftheabdominalcavityreducestumorimplantationinalaparoscopicmousemodel