Cargando…

Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production

BACKGROUND: Ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment could enable an economically viable route to produce biofuels by providing efficient means to extract sugars and lignin from lignocellulosic biomass. However, to realize this, novel IL-based processes need to be developed in order to minimize the overall pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konda, NVSN Murthy, Shi, Jian, Singh, Seema, Blanch, Harvey W, Simmons, Blake A, Klein-Marcuschamer, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24932217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-86
_version_ 1782320738973253632
author Konda, NVSN Murthy
Shi, Jian
Singh, Seema
Blanch, Harvey W
Simmons, Blake A
Klein-Marcuschamer, Daniel
author_facet Konda, NVSN Murthy
Shi, Jian
Singh, Seema
Blanch, Harvey W
Simmons, Blake A
Klein-Marcuschamer, Daniel
author_sort Konda, NVSN Murthy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment could enable an economically viable route to produce biofuels by providing efficient means to extract sugars and lignin from lignocellulosic biomass. However, to realize this, novel IL-based processes need to be developed in order to minimize the overall production costs and accelerate commercial viability. In this study, two variants of IL-based processes are considered: one based on complete removal of the IL prior to hydrolysis using a water-wash (WW) step and the other based on a “one-pot” (OP) process that does not require IL removal prior to saccharification. Detailed techno-economic analysis (TEA) of these two routes was carried out to understand the cost drivers, economic potential (minimum ethanol selling price, MESP), and relative merits and challenges of each route. RESULTS: At high biomass loading (50%), both routes exhibited comparable economic performance with an MESP of $6.3/gal. With the possible advances identified (reduced water or acid/base consumption, improved conversion in pretreatment, and lignin valorization), the MESP could be reduced to around $3/gal ($3.2 in the WW route and $2.8 in the OP route). CONCLUSIONS: It was found that, to be competitive at industrial scale, lowered cost of ILs used and higher biomass loadings (50%) are essential for both routes, and in particular for the OP route. Overall, while the economic potential of both routes appears to be comparable at higher biomass loadings, the OP route showed the benefit of lower water consumption at the plant level, an important cost and sustainability consideration for biorefineries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4055852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40558522014-06-14 Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production Konda, NVSN Murthy Shi, Jian Singh, Seema Blanch, Harvey W Simmons, Blake A Klein-Marcuschamer, Daniel Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment could enable an economically viable route to produce biofuels by providing efficient means to extract sugars and lignin from lignocellulosic biomass. However, to realize this, novel IL-based processes need to be developed in order to minimize the overall production costs and accelerate commercial viability. In this study, two variants of IL-based processes are considered: one based on complete removal of the IL prior to hydrolysis using a water-wash (WW) step and the other based on a “one-pot” (OP) process that does not require IL removal prior to saccharification. Detailed techno-economic analysis (TEA) of these two routes was carried out to understand the cost drivers, economic potential (minimum ethanol selling price, MESP), and relative merits and challenges of each route. RESULTS: At high biomass loading (50%), both routes exhibited comparable economic performance with an MESP of $6.3/gal. With the possible advances identified (reduced water or acid/base consumption, improved conversion in pretreatment, and lignin valorization), the MESP could be reduced to around $3/gal ($3.2 in the WW route and $2.8 in the OP route). CONCLUSIONS: It was found that, to be competitive at industrial scale, lowered cost of ILs used and higher biomass loadings (50%) are essential for both routes, and in particular for the OP route. Overall, while the economic potential of both routes appears to be comparable at higher biomass loadings, the OP route showed the benefit of lower water consumption at the plant level, an important cost and sustainability consideration for biorefineries. BioMed Central 2014-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4055852/ /pubmed/24932217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-86 Text en Copyright © 2014 Konda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Konda, NVSN Murthy
Shi, Jian
Singh, Seema
Blanch, Harvey W
Simmons, Blake A
Klein-Marcuschamer, Daniel
Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production
title Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production
title_full Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production
title_fullStr Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production
title_full_unstemmed Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production
title_short Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production
title_sort understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4055852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24932217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-86
work_keys_str_mv AT kondanvsnmurthy understandingcostdriversandeconomicpotentialoftwovariantsofionicliquidpretreatmentforcellulosicbiofuelproduction
AT shijian understandingcostdriversandeconomicpotentialoftwovariantsofionicliquidpretreatmentforcellulosicbiofuelproduction
AT singhseema understandingcostdriversandeconomicpotentialoftwovariantsofionicliquidpretreatmentforcellulosicbiofuelproduction
AT blanchharveyw understandingcostdriversandeconomicpotentialoftwovariantsofionicliquidpretreatmentforcellulosicbiofuelproduction
AT simmonsblakea understandingcostdriversandeconomicpotentialoftwovariantsofionicliquidpretreatmentforcellulosicbiofuelproduction
AT kleinmarcuschamerdaniel understandingcostdriversandeconomicpotentialoftwovariantsofionicliquidpretreatmentforcellulosicbiofuelproduction