Cargando…

Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND: [(18)F]fluorothymidine (FLT) has been proposed as a positron emission tomography (PET)-imaging biomarker of proliferation for breast cancer. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility of FLT-PET-CT as a technique for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woolf, D K, Beresford, M, Li, S P, Dowsett, M, Sanghera, B, Wong, W L, Sonoda, L, Detre, S, Amin, V, Ah-See, M-L, Miles, D, Makris, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24832174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.207
_version_ 1782320772540268544
author Woolf, D K
Beresford, M
Li, S P
Dowsett, M
Sanghera, B
Wong, W L
Sonoda, L
Detre, S
Amin, V
Ah-See, M-L
Miles, D
Makris, A
author_facet Woolf, D K
Beresford, M
Li, S P
Dowsett, M
Sanghera, B
Wong, W L
Sonoda, L
Detre, S
Amin, V
Ah-See, M-L
Miles, D
Makris, A
author_sort Woolf, D K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: [(18)F]fluorothymidine (FLT) has been proposed as a positron emission tomography (PET)-imaging biomarker of proliferation for breast cancer. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility of FLT-PET-CT as a technique for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in primary breast cancer and to compare baseline FLT with Ki-67. METHODS: Twenty women with primary breast cancer had a baseline FLT-PET-CT scan that was repeated before the second cycle of chemotherapy. Expression of Ki-67 in the diagnostic biopsy was quantified. From the FLT-PET-CT scans lesion maximum and mean standardised uptake values (SUV(max), SUV(mean)) were calculated. RESULTS: Mean baseline SUV(max) was 7.3, and 4.62 post one cycle of NAC, representing a drop of 2.68 (36.3%). There was no significant association between baseline, post chemotherapy, or change in SUV(max) and pathological response to NAC. There was a significant correlation between pre-chemotherapy Ki-67 and SUV(max) of 0.604 (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline SUV(max) measurements of FLT-PET-CT were significantly related to Ki-67 suggesting that it is a proliferation biomarker. However, in this series neither the baseline value nor the change in SUV(max) after one cycle of NAC were able to predict response as most patients had a sizeable SUV(max) reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4056049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40560492015-06-10 Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer Woolf, D K Beresford, M Li, S P Dowsett, M Sanghera, B Wong, W L Sonoda, L Detre, S Amin, V Ah-See, M-L Miles, D Makris, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: [(18)F]fluorothymidine (FLT) has been proposed as a positron emission tomography (PET)-imaging biomarker of proliferation for breast cancer. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility of FLT-PET-CT as a technique for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in primary breast cancer and to compare baseline FLT with Ki-67. METHODS: Twenty women with primary breast cancer had a baseline FLT-PET-CT scan that was repeated before the second cycle of chemotherapy. Expression of Ki-67 in the diagnostic biopsy was quantified. From the FLT-PET-CT scans lesion maximum and mean standardised uptake values (SUV(max), SUV(mean)) were calculated. RESULTS: Mean baseline SUV(max) was 7.3, and 4.62 post one cycle of NAC, representing a drop of 2.68 (36.3%). There was no significant association between baseline, post chemotherapy, or change in SUV(max) and pathological response to NAC. There was a significant correlation between pre-chemotherapy Ki-67 and SUV(max) of 0.604 (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline SUV(max) measurements of FLT-PET-CT were significantly related to Ki-67 suggesting that it is a proliferation biomarker. However, in this series neither the baseline value nor the change in SUV(max) after one cycle of NAC were able to predict response as most patients had a sizeable SUV(max) reduction. Nature Publishing Group 2014-06-10 2014-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4056049/ /pubmed/24832174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.207 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Woolf, D K
Beresford, M
Li, S P
Dowsett, M
Sanghera, B
Wong, W L
Sonoda, L
Detre, S
Amin, V
Ah-See, M-L
Miles, D
Makris, A
Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer
title Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer
title_full Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer
title_short Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer
title_sort evaluation of flt-pet-ct as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24832174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.207
work_keys_str_mv AT woolfdk evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT beresfordm evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT lisp evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT dowsettm evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT sangherab evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT wongwl evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT sonodal evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT detres evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT aminv evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT ahseeml evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT milesd evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer
AT makrisa evaluationoffltpetctasanimagingbiomarkerofproliferationinprimarybreastcancer