Cargando…

Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP)

BACKGROUND: Screening for prostate cancer continues to generate controversy because of concerns about over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment. We describe the rationale, design and recruitment of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP) trial, a UK-wide cluster randomis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, E L, Metcalfe, C, Donovan, J L, Noble, S, Sterne, J A C, Lane, J A, Avery, K N, Down, L, Walsh, E, Davis, M, Ben-Shlomo, Y, Oliver, S E, Evans, S, Brindle, P, Williams, N J, Hughes, L J, Hill, E M, Davies, C, Ng, S Y, Neal, D E, Hamdy, F C, Martin, R M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24867688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.242
_version_ 1782320774351159296
author Turner, E L
Metcalfe, C
Donovan, J L
Noble, S
Sterne, J A C
Lane, J A
Avery, K N
Down, L
Walsh, E
Davis, M
Ben-Shlomo, Y
Oliver, S E
Evans, S
Brindle, P
Williams, N J
Hughes, L J
Hill, E M
Davies, C
Ng, S Y
Neal, D E
Hamdy, F C
Martin, R M
author_facet Turner, E L
Metcalfe, C
Donovan, J L
Noble, S
Sterne, J A C
Lane, J A
Avery, K N
Down, L
Walsh, E
Davis, M
Ben-Shlomo, Y
Oliver, S E
Evans, S
Brindle, P
Williams, N J
Hughes, L J
Hill, E M
Davies, C
Ng, S Y
Neal, D E
Hamdy, F C
Martin, R M
author_sort Turner, E L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for prostate cancer continues to generate controversy because of concerns about over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment. We describe the rationale, design and recruitment of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP) trial, a UK-wide cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. METHODS: Seven hundred and eighty-five general practitioner (GP) practices in England and Wales were randomised to a population-based PSA testing or standard care and then approached for consent to participate. In the intervention arm, men aged 50–69 years were invited to undergo PSA testing, and those diagnosed with localised prostate cancer were invited into a treatment trial. Control arm practices undertook standard UK management. All men were flagged with the Health and Social Care Information Centre for deaths and cancer registrations. The primary outcome is prostate cancer mortality at a median 10-year-follow-up. RESULTS: Among randomised practices, 271 (68%) in the intervention arm (198 114 men) and 302 (78%) in the control arm (221 929 men) consented to participate, meeting pre-specified power requirements. There was little evidence of differences between trial arms in measured baseline characteristics of the consenting GP practices (or men within those practices). CONCLUSIONS: The CAP trial successfully met its recruitment targets and will make an important contribution to international understanding of PSA-based prostate cancer screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4056057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40560572015-06-10 Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP) Turner, E L Metcalfe, C Donovan, J L Noble, S Sterne, J A C Lane, J A Avery, K N Down, L Walsh, E Davis, M Ben-Shlomo, Y Oliver, S E Evans, S Brindle, P Williams, N J Hughes, L J Hill, E M Davies, C Ng, S Y Neal, D E Hamdy, F C Martin, R M Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Screening for prostate cancer continues to generate controversy because of concerns about over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment. We describe the rationale, design and recruitment of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP) trial, a UK-wide cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. METHODS: Seven hundred and eighty-five general practitioner (GP) practices in England and Wales were randomised to a population-based PSA testing or standard care and then approached for consent to participate. In the intervention arm, men aged 50–69 years were invited to undergo PSA testing, and those diagnosed with localised prostate cancer were invited into a treatment trial. Control arm practices undertook standard UK management. All men were flagged with the Health and Social Care Information Centre for deaths and cancer registrations. The primary outcome is prostate cancer mortality at a median 10-year-follow-up. RESULTS: Among randomised practices, 271 (68%) in the intervention arm (198 114 men) and 302 (78%) in the control arm (221 929 men) consented to participate, meeting pre-specified power requirements. There was little evidence of differences between trial arms in measured baseline characteristics of the consenting GP practices (or men within those practices). CONCLUSIONS: The CAP trial successfully met its recruitment targets and will make an important contribution to international understanding of PSA-based prostate cancer screening. Nature Publishing Group 2014-06-10 2014-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4056057/ /pubmed/24867688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.242 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Turner, E L
Metcalfe, C
Donovan, J L
Noble, S
Sterne, J A C
Lane, J A
Avery, K N
Down, L
Walsh, E
Davis, M
Ben-Shlomo, Y
Oliver, S E
Evans, S
Brindle, P
Williams, N J
Hughes, L J
Hill, E M
Davies, C
Ng, S Y
Neal, D E
Hamdy, F C
Martin, R M
Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP)
title Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP)
title_full Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP)
title_fullStr Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP)
title_full_unstemmed Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP)
title_short Design and preliminary recruitment results of the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP)
title_sort design and preliminary recruitment results of the cluster randomised trial of psa testing for prostate cancer (cap)
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24867688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.242
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerel designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT metcalfec designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT donovanjl designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT nobles designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT sternejac designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT laneja designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT averykn designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT downl designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT walshe designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT davism designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT benshlomoy designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT oliverse designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT evanss designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT brindlep designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT williamsnj designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT hugheslj designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT hillem designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT daviesc designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT ngsy designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT nealde designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT hamdyfc designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT martinrm designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap
AT designandpreliminaryrecruitmentresultsoftheclusterrandomisedtrialofpsatestingforprostatecancercap