Cargando…
Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’
Denehy and colleagues conducted a novel randomized controlled trial evaluating a rehabilitation intervention starting in the ICU and continuing through the outpatient setting, with 1 year longitudinal follow-up. While the intervention did not demonstrate improved patient outcomes, this study illustr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24103735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12884 |
_version_ | 1782320786153930752 |
---|---|
author | Parker, Ann Tehranchi, Kian M Needham, Dale M |
author_facet | Parker, Ann Tehranchi, Kian M Needham, Dale M |
author_sort | Parker, Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | Denehy and colleagues conducted a novel randomized controlled trial evaluating a rehabilitation intervention starting in the ICU and continuing through the outpatient setting, with 1 year longitudinal follow-up. While the intervention did not demonstrate improved patient outcomes, this study illustrates important issues regarding ‘usual care’ control groups in clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4056109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40561092014-06-14 Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’ Parker, Ann Tehranchi, Kian M Needham, Dale M Crit Care Commentary Denehy and colleagues conducted a novel randomized controlled trial evaluating a rehabilitation intervention starting in the ICU and continuing through the outpatient setting, with 1 year longitudinal follow-up. While the intervention did not demonstrate improved patient outcomes, this study illustrates important issues regarding ‘usual care’ control groups in clinical trials. BioMed Central 2013 2013-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4056109/ /pubmed/24103735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12884 Text en Copyright © 2013 BioMed Central Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Parker, Ann Tehranchi, Kian M Needham, Dale M Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’ |
title | Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’ |
title_full | Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’ |
title_fullStr | Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’ |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’ |
title_short | Critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’ |
title_sort | critical care rehabilitation trials: the importance of ‘usual care’ |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24103735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12884 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkerann criticalcarerehabilitationtrialstheimportanceofusualcare AT tehranchikianm criticalcarerehabilitationtrialstheimportanceofusualcare AT needhamdalem criticalcarerehabilitationtrialstheimportanceofusualcare |