Cargando…
Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study
BACKGROUND: Microbial contamination of the pulp space is one of the major factors associated with endodontic failure. Thus, in addition to a three dimentional apical filling a coronal seal for root canal fillings has been recommended. AIM: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944446 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131783 |
_version_ | 1782320826355286016 |
---|---|
author | Parekh, Bandish Irani, Rukshin S. Sathe, Sucheta Hegde, Vivek |
author_facet | Parekh, Bandish Irani, Rukshin S. Sathe, Sucheta Hegde, Vivek |
author_sort | Parekh, Bandish |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microbial contamination of the pulp space is one of the major factors associated with endodontic failure. Thus, in addition to a three dimentional apical filling a coronal seal for root canal fillings has been recommended. AIM: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the intra-orifice sealing ability of three experimental materials after obturation of the root canal system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourty single rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated, cleaned, shaped and obturated. Gutta-percha was removed to the depth of 3.5 mm from the orifice with a heated plugger. Ten specimens each were sealed with Light Cure Glass Ionomer Cement (LCGIC), Flowable Composite (Tetric N-Flow), and Light Cure Glass Ionomer Cement with Flowable Composite in Sandwich Technique along with a positive control respectively and roots submerged in Rhodamine-B dye in vacuum for one week. Specimens were longitudinally sectioned and leakage measured using a 10X stereomicroscope and graded for depth of leakage. RESULTS: According to the results of the present study LC GIC + Tetric N Flow demonstrated significantly better seal (P < 0.01) than LC GIC. However there was no statistically significant difference in leakage (P > 0.01) between Tetric N-Flow and LCGIC+Tetric N-Flow groups. CONCLUSION: In the current study LCGIC+Tetric N-Flow was found to be superior over other experimental materials as intra-orifice barriers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4056394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40563942014-06-18 Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study Parekh, Bandish Irani, Rukshin S. Sathe, Sucheta Hegde, Vivek J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Microbial contamination of the pulp space is one of the major factors associated with endodontic failure. Thus, in addition to a three dimentional apical filling a coronal seal for root canal fillings has been recommended. AIM: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the intra-orifice sealing ability of three experimental materials after obturation of the root canal system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourty single rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated, cleaned, shaped and obturated. Gutta-percha was removed to the depth of 3.5 mm from the orifice with a heated plugger. Ten specimens each were sealed with Light Cure Glass Ionomer Cement (LCGIC), Flowable Composite (Tetric N-Flow), and Light Cure Glass Ionomer Cement with Flowable Composite in Sandwich Technique along with a positive control respectively and roots submerged in Rhodamine-B dye in vacuum for one week. Specimens were longitudinally sectioned and leakage measured using a 10X stereomicroscope and graded for depth of leakage. RESULTS: According to the results of the present study LC GIC + Tetric N Flow demonstrated significantly better seal (P < 0.01) than LC GIC. However there was no statistically significant difference in leakage (P > 0.01) between Tetric N-Flow and LCGIC+Tetric N-Flow groups. CONCLUSION: In the current study LCGIC+Tetric N-Flow was found to be superior over other experimental materials as intra-orifice barriers. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4056394/ /pubmed/24944446 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131783 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Parekh, Bandish Irani, Rukshin S. Sathe, Sucheta Hegde, Vivek Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study |
title | Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study |
title_full | Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study |
title_short | Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study |
title_sort | intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944446 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parekhbandish intraorificesealingabilityofdifferentmaterialsinendodonticallytreatedteethaninvitrostudy AT iranirukshins intraorificesealingabilityofdifferentmaterialsinendodonticallytreatedteethaninvitrostudy AT sathesucheta intraorificesealingabilityofdifferentmaterialsinendodonticallytreatedteethaninvitrostudy AT hegdevivek intraorificesealingabilityofdifferentmaterialsinendodonticallytreatedteethaninvitrostudy |