Cargando…

Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study

BACKGROUND: Microbial contamination of the pulp space is one of the major factors associated with endodontic failure. Thus, in addition to a three dimentional apical filling a coronal seal for root canal fillings has been recommended. AIM: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parekh, Bandish, Irani, Rukshin S., Sathe, Sucheta, Hegde, Vivek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944446
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131783
_version_ 1782320826355286016
author Parekh, Bandish
Irani, Rukshin S.
Sathe, Sucheta
Hegde, Vivek
author_facet Parekh, Bandish
Irani, Rukshin S.
Sathe, Sucheta
Hegde, Vivek
author_sort Parekh, Bandish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microbial contamination of the pulp space is one of the major factors associated with endodontic failure. Thus, in addition to a three dimentional apical filling a coronal seal for root canal fillings has been recommended. AIM: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the intra-orifice sealing ability of three experimental materials after obturation of the root canal system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourty single rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated, cleaned, shaped and obturated. Gutta-percha was removed to the depth of 3.5 mm from the orifice with a heated plugger. Ten specimens each were sealed with Light Cure Glass Ionomer Cement (LCGIC), Flowable Composite (Tetric N-Flow), and Light Cure Glass Ionomer Cement with Flowable Composite in Sandwich Technique along with a positive control respectively and roots submerged in Rhodamine-B dye in vacuum for one week. Specimens were longitudinally sectioned and leakage measured using a 10X stereomicroscope and graded for depth of leakage. RESULTS: According to the results of the present study LC GIC + Tetric N Flow demonstrated significantly better seal (P < 0.01) than LC GIC. However there was no statistically significant difference in leakage (P > 0.01) between Tetric N-Flow and LCGIC+Tetric N-Flow groups. CONCLUSION: In the current study LCGIC+Tetric N-Flow was found to be superior over other experimental materials as intra-orifice barriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4056394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40563942014-06-18 Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study Parekh, Bandish Irani, Rukshin S. Sathe, Sucheta Hegde, Vivek J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Microbial contamination of the pulp space is one of the major factors associated with endodontic failure. Thus, in addition to a three dimentional apical filling a coronal seal for root canal fillings has been recommended. AIM: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the intra-orifice sealing ability of three experimental materials after obturation of the root canal system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourty single rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated, cleaned, shaped and obturated. Gutta-percha was removed to the depth of 3.5 mm from the orifice with a heated plugger. Ten specimens each were sealed with Light Cure Glass Ionomer Cement (LCGIC), Flowable Composite (Tetric N-Flow), and Light Cure Glass Ionomer Cement with Flowable Composite in Sandwich Technique along with a positive control respectively and roots submerged in Rhodamine-B dye in vacuum for one week. Specimens were longitudinally sectioned and leakage measured using a 10X stereomicroscope and graded for depth of leakage. RESULTS: According to the results of the present study LC GIC + Tetric N Flow demonstrated significantly better seal (P < 0.01) than LC GIC. However there was no statistically significant difference in leakage (P > 0.01) between Tetric N-Flow and LCGIC+Tetric N-Flow groups. CONCLUSION: In the current study LCGIC+Tetric N-Flow was found to be superior over other experimental materials as intra-orifice barriers. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4056394/ /pubmed/24944446 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131783 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Parekh, Bandish
Irani, Rukshin S.
Sathe, Sucheta
Hegde, Vivek
Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study
title Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study
title_full Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study
title_short Intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study
title_sort intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944446
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131783
work_keys_str_mv AT parekhbandish intraorificesealingabilityofdifferentmaterialsinendodonticallytreatedteethaninvitrostudy
AT iranirukshins intraorificesealingabilityofdifferentmaterialsinendodonticallytreatedteethaninvitrostudy
AT sathesucheta intraorificesealingabilityofdifferentmaterialsinendodonticallytreatedteethaninvitrostudy
AT hegdevivek intraorificesealingabilityofdifferentmaterialsinendodonticallytreatedteethaninvitrostudy