Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study

AIM: The aim of this ex vivo study was to compare the antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces viscosus through disk diffusion method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The antibacterial effects of Single Bond (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amin, Swathi, Shetty, Harish K., Varma, Ravi K., Amin, Vivek, Nair, Prathap M. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944452
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131794
_version_ 1782320827711094784
author Amin, Swathi
Shetty, Harish K.
Varma, Ravi K.
Amin, Vivek
Nair, Prathap M. S.
author_facet Amin, Swathi
Shetty, Harish K.
Varma, Ravi K.
Amin, Vivek
Nair, Prathap M. S.
author_sort Amin, Swathi
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this ex vivo study was to compare the antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces viscosus through disk diffusion method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The antibacterial effects of Single Bond (SB) and Adper Prompt (AP) and aqueous solution of chlorhexidine 0.2% (positive control) were tested against standard strain of S. mutans, L. acidophilus, and A. viscosus using the disk diffusion method. The diameters of inhibition zones were measured in millimeters. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparison. RESULT: Of all the materials tested, AP showed the maximum inhibitory action against S. mutans and L. acidophilus. Aqueous solution of chlorhexidine 0.2% showed the maximum inhibitory action against A. viscosus. Very minimal antibacterial effect was noted for SB. CONCLUSION: The antibacterial effects observed for the tested different dentin bonding systems may be related to the acidic nature of the materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4056400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40564002014-06-18 Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study Amin, Swathi Shetty, Harish K. Varma, Ravi K. Amin, Vivek Nair, Prathap M. S. J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this ex vivo study was to compare the antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces viscosus through disk diffusion method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The antibacterial effects of Single Bond (SB) and Adper Prompt (AP) and aqueous solution of chlorhexidine 0.2% (positive control) were tested against standard strain of S. mutans, L. acidophilus, and A. viscosus using the disk diffusion method. The diameters of inhibition zones were measured in millimeters. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparison. RESULT: Of all the materials tested, AP showed the maximum inhibitory action against S. mutans and L. acidophilus. Aqueous solution of chlorhexidine 0.2% showed the maximum inhibitory action against A. viscosus. Very minimal antibacterial effect was noted for SB. CONCLUSION: The antibacterial effects observed for the tested different dentin bonding systems may be related to the acidic nature of the materials. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4056400/ /pubmed/24944452 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131794 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Amin, Swathi
Shetty, Harish K.
Varma, Ravi K.
Amin, Vivek
Nair, Prathap M. S.
Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: an ex vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944452
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131794
work_keys_str_mv AT aminswathi comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy
AT shettyharishk comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy
AT varmaravik comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy
AT aminvivek comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy
AT nairprathapms comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy