Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study
AIM: The aim of this ex vivo study was to compare the antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces viscosus through disk diffusion method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The antibacterial effects of Single Bond (...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944452 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131794 |
_version_ | 1782320827711094784 |
---|---|
author | Amin, Swathi Shetty, Harish K. Varma, Ravi K. Amin, Vivek Nair, Prathap M. S. |
author_facet | Amin, Swathi Shetty, Harish K. Varma, Ravi K. Amin, Vivek Nair, Prathap M. S. |
author_sort | Amin, Swathi |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this ex vivo study was to compare the antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces viscosus through disk diffusion method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The antibacterial effects of Single Bond (SB) and Adper Prompt (AP) and aqueous solution of chlorhexidine 0.2% (positive control) were tested against standard strain of S. mutans, L. acidophilus, and A. viscosus using the disk diffusion method. The diameters of inhibition zones were measured in millimeters. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparison. RESULT: Of all the materials tested, AP showed the maximum inhibitory action against S. mutans and L. acidophilus. Aqueous solution of chlorhexidine 0.2% showed the maximum inhibitory action against A. viscosus. Very minimal antibacterial effect was noted for SB. CONCLUSION: The antibacterial effects observed for the tested different dentin bonding systems may be related to the acidic nature of the materials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4056400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40564002014-06-18 Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study Amin, Swathi Shetty, Harish K. Varma, Ravi K. Amin, Vivek Nair, Prathap M. S. J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this ex vivo study was to compare the antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces viscosus through disk diffusion method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The antibacterial effects of Single Bond (SB) and Adper Prompt (AP) and aqueous solution of chlorhexidine 0.2% (positive control) were tested against standard strain of S. mutans, L. acidophilus, and A. viscosus using the disk diffusion method. The diameters of inhibition zones were measured in millimeters. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Mann-Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparison. RESULT: Of all the materials tested, AP showed the maximum inhibitory action against S. mutans and L. acidophilus. Aqueous solution of chlorhexidine 0.2% showed the maximum inhibitory action against A. viscosus. Very minimal antibacterial effect was noted for SB. CONCLUSION: The antibacterial effects observed for the tested different dentin bonding systems may be related to the acidic nature of the materials. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4056400/ /pubmed/24944452 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131794 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Amin, Swathi Shetty, Harish K. Varma, Ravi K. Amin, Vivek Nair, Prathap M. S. Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: An ex vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems: an ex vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944452 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.131794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aminswathi comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy AT shettyharishk comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy AT varmaravik comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy AT aminvivek comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy AT nairprathapms comparativeevaluationofantibacterialactivityoftotaletchandselfetchadhesivesystemsanexvitrostudy |