Cargando…

An automated and standardized neural index to quantify patient-ventilator interaction

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to validate an automated, objective and standardized algorithm for quantifying and displaying patient-ventilator interaction. METHODS: Using a new method to detect patient-ventilator synchrony, the present study re-analyzed previously acquired and published da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinderby, Christer, Liu, Songqiao, Colombo, Davide, Camarotta, Gianmaria, Slutsky, Arthur S, Navalesi, Paolo, Beck, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24131701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13063
_version_ 1782320843263574016
author Sinderby, Christer
Liu, Songqiao
Colombo, Davide
Camarotta, Gianmaria
Slutsky, Arthur S
Navalesi, Paolo
Beck, Jennifer
author_facet Sinderby, Christer
Liu, Songqiao
Colombo, Davide
Camarotta, Gianmaria
Slutsky, Arthur S
Navalesi, Paolo
Beck, Jennifer
author_sort Sinderby, Christer
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to validate an automated, objective and standardized algorithm for quantifying and displaying patient-ventilator interaction. METHODS: Using a new method to detect patient-ventilator synchrony, the present study re-analyzed previously acquired and published data from 24 mechanically ventilated adult patients (Colombo et al., Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2452–7). Patient-ventilator interactions were evaluated by comparing ventilator pressure and diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi) waveforms, recorded during pressure support ventilation. The EAdi and ventilator pressure waveforms were analyzed for their timings (manually and automatically determined), and the error between the two waveforms was quantified. A new index of patient-ventilator interaction (NeuroSync index), which is standardized and automated, was validated and compared to manual analysis and previously published indices of asynchrony. RESULTS: The comparison of manual and automated detection methods produced high test-retest and inter-rater reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95). The NeuroSync index increased the sensitivity of detecting dyssynchronies, compared to previously published indices, which were found to only detect asynchronies. CONCLUSION: The present study introduces an automated method and the NeuroSync index to determine patient-ventilator interaction with a more sensitive analysis method than those previously described. A dashboard-style of graphical display allows a rapid overview of patient-ventilator interaction and breathing pattern at the bedside.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4056567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40565672014-06-14 An automated and standardized neural index to quantify patient-ventilator interaction Sinderby, Christer Liu, Songqiao Colombo, Davide Camarotta, Gianmaria Slutsky, Arthur S Navalesi, Paolo Beck, Jennifer Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to validate an automated, objective and standardized algorithm for quantifying and displaying patient-ventilator interaction. METHODS: Using a new method to detect patient-ventilator synchrony, the present study re-analyzed previously acquired and published data from 24 mechanically ventilated adult patients (Colombo et al., Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2452–7). Patient-ventilator interactions were evaluated by comparing ventilator pressure and diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi) waveforms, recorded during pressure support ventilation. The EAdi and ventilator pressure waveforms were analyzed for their timings (manually and automatically determined), and the error between the two waveforms was quantified. A new index of patient-ventilator interaction (NeuroSync index), which is standardized and automated, was validated and compared to manual analysis and previously published indices of asynchrony. RESULTS: The comparison of manual and automated detection methods produced high test-retest and inter-rater reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95). The NeuroSync index increased the sensitivity of detecting dyssynchronies, compared to previously published indices, which were found to only detect asynchronies. CONCLUSION: The present study introduces an automated method and the NeuroSync index to determine patient-ventilator interaction with a more sensitive analysis method than those previously described. A dashboard-style of graphical display allows a rapid overview of patient-ventilator interaction and breathing pattern at the bedside. BioMed Central 2013 2013-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4056567/ /pubmed/24131701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13063 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sinderby et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sinderby, Christer
Liu, Songqiao
Colombo, Davide
Camarotta, Gianmaria
Slutsky, Arthur S
Navalesi, Paolo
Beck, Jennifer
An automated and standardized neural index to quantify patient-ventilator interaction
title An automated and standardized neural index to quantify patient-ventilator interaction
title_full An automated and standardized neural index to quantify patient-ventilator interaction
title_fullStr An automated and standardized neural index to quantify patient-ventilator interaction
title_full_unstemmed An automated and standardized neural index to quantify patient-ventilator interaction
title_short An automated and standardized neural index to quantify patient-ventilator interaction
title_sort automated and standardized neural index to quantify patient-ventilator interaction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24131701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13063
work_keys_str_mv AT sinderbychrister anautomatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT liusongqiao anautomatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT colombodavide anautomatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT camarottagianmaria anautomatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT slutskyarthurs anautomatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT navalesipaolo anautomatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT beckjennifer anautomatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT sinderbychrister automatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT liusongqiao automatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT colombodavide automatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT camarottagianmaria automatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT slutskyarthurs automatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT navalesipaolo automatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction
AT beckjennifer automatedandstandardizedneuralindextoquantifypatientventilatorinteraction