Cargando…
Pro/con debate: Should PaCO2 be tightly controlled in all patients with acute brain injuries?
You are the attending intensivist in a neurointensive care unit caring for a woman five days post-rupture of a cerebral aneurysm (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Grade 4 and Fisher Grade 3). She is intubated for airway protection and mild hypoxemia related to an aspiration event at the tim...
Autores principales: | Go, Stephanie L, Singh, Jeffrey M |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23360555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11389 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Pro/con clinical debate: Hydroxyethylstarches should be avoided in septic patients
por: Schortgen, Frédérique, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Elevated PaCO(2) levels increase pulmonary artery pressure
por: Triantaris, Apostolos, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Pro/Con debate: Should 24/7 in-house intensivist coverage be implemented?
por: Arabi, Yaseen
Publicado: (2008) -
Pro/con debate: Should synthetic colloids be used in patients with septic shock?
por: Downar, James, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
por: Villegas, Maria Virginia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)