Cargando…
Criticizing reporting standards fails to improve quality in animal research
Autores principales: | Otto, Gordon P, Claus, Ralf A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25029664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13804 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Improving animal research reporting standards: HARRP, the first step of a unified approach by ICLAS to improve animal research reporting standards worldwide
por: Osborne, Nikki, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) for improved design, reporting and scientific quality of animal studies GSPC versus ARRIVE guidelines
por: Hooijmans, C, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Arginine metabolism is markedly impaired in polymicrobial infected mice
por: Otto, Gordon P, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Impact of sepsis-associated cytokine storm on plasma NGAL during acute kidney injury in a model of polymicrobial sepsis
por: Otto, Gordon P, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
A Critical Appraisal of the Review Study to Improve Its Reporting Quality
por: Behghadami, Mehrdad Amir, et al.
Publicado: (2019)