Cargando…

On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth

One of the rationales for the use of vasopressin in septic shock has been its potential cardioprotective mechanisms. Lower heart rates, higher arterial pressures, and fewer norepinephrine doses during vasopressin therapy were hypothesized to protect the heart from myocardial ischemia. In a prospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse, Dünser, Martin W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24099434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12772
_version_ 1782320857334415360
author Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse
Dünser, Martin W
author_facet Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse
Dünser, Martin W
author_sort Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse
collection PubMed
description One of the rationales for the use of vasopressin in septic shock has been its potential cardioprotective mechanisms. Lower heart rates, higher arterial pressures, and fewer norepinephrine doses during vasopressin therapy were hypothesized to protect the heart from myocardial ischemia. In a prospective sub-study of the VASST (Vasopressin in Septic Shock Trial) project, Mehta and colleagues specifically evaluated this hypothesis but failed to find lower cardiac biomarkers or fewer ischemic electrocardiogram changes in patients receiving vasopressin compared with subjects receiving norepinephrine alone. After recent evidence of a lacking survival benefit, the present study results further challenge the future role of vasopressin as a vasopressor in septic shock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4056642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40566422014-10-08 On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Dünser, Martin W Crit Care Commentary One of the rationales for the use of vasopressin in septic shock has been its potential cardioprotective mechanisms. Lower heart rates, higher arterial pressures, and fewer norepinephrine doses during vasopressin therapy were hypothesized to protect the heart from myocardial ischemia. In a prospective sub-study of the VASST (Vasopressin in Septic Shock Trial) project, Mehta and colleagues specifically evaluated this hypothesis but failed to find lower cardiac biomarkers or fewer ischemic electrocardiogram changes in patients receiving vasopressin compared with subjects receiving norepinephrine alone. After recent evidence of a lacking survival benefit, the present study results further challenge the future role of vasopressin as a vasopressor in septic shock. BioMed Central 2013 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4056642/ /pubmed/24099434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12772 Text en Copyright © 2013 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse
Dünser, Martin W
On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth
title On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth
title_full On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth
title_fullStr On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth
title_full_unstemmed On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth
title_short On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth
title_sort on sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24099434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12772
work_keys_str_mv AT gradwohlmatisilse onsepsistroponinandvasopressinthebittertruth
AT dunsermartinw onsepsistroponinandvasopressinthebittertruth