Cargando…
On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth
One of the rationales for the use of vasopressin in septic shock has been its potential cardioprotective mechanisms. Lower heart rates, higher arterial pressures, and fewer norepinephrine doses during vasopressin therapy were hypothesized to protect the heart from myocardial ischemia. In a prospecti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24099434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12772 |
_version_ | 1782320857334415360 |
---|---|
author | Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Dünser, Martin W |
author_facet | Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Dünser, Martin W |
author_sort | Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the rationales for the use of vasopressin in septic shock has been its potential cardioprotective mechanisms. Lower heart rates, higher arterial pressures, and fewer norepinephrine doses during vasopressin therapy were hypothesized to protect the heart from myocardial ischemia. In a prospective sub-study of the VASST (Vasopressin in Septic Shock Trial) project, Mehta and colleagues specifically evaluated this hypothesis but failed to find lower cardiac biomarkers or fewer ischemic electrocardiogram changes in patients receiving vasopressin compared with subjects receiving norepinephrine alone. After recent evidence of a lacking survival benefit, the present study results further challenge the future role of vasopressin as a vasopressor in septic shock. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4056642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40566422014-10-08 On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Dünser, Martin W Crit Care Commentary One of the rationales for the use of vasopressin in septic shock has been its potential cardioprotective mechanisms. Lower heart rates, higher arterial pressures, and fewer norepinephrine doses during vasopressin therapy were hypothesized to protect the heart from myocardial ischemia. In a prospective sub-study of the VASST (Vasopressin in Septic Shock Trial) project, Mehta and colleagues specifically evaluated this hypothesis but failed to find lower cardiac biomarkers or fewer ischemic electrocardiogram changes in patients receiving vasopressin compared with subjects receiving norepinephrine alone. After recent evidence of a lacking survival benefit, the present study results further challenge the future role of vasopressin as a vasopressor in septic shock. BioMed Central 2013 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4056642/ /pubmed/24099434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12772 Text en Copyright © 2013 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Gradwohl-Matis, Ilse Dünser, Martin W On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth |
title | On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth |
title_full | On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth |
title_fullStr | On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth |
title_full_unstemmed | On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth |
title_short | On sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth |
title_sort | on sepsis, troponin and vasopressin: the bitter truth |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4056642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24099434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12772 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gradwohlmatisilse onsepsistroponinandvasopressinthebittertruth AT dunsermartinw onsepsistroponinandvasopressinthebittertruth |