Cargando…
The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients
INTRODUCTION: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a useful tool for minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU. Dynamic indices (such as the inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC)) can be used to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Although quantit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13693 |
_version_ | 1782320899407478784 |
---|---|
author | Duwat, Antoine Zogheib, Elie Guinot, Pierre Grégoire Levy, Franck Trojette, Faouzi Diouf, Momar Slama, Michel Dupont, Hervé |
author_facet | Duwat, Antoine Zogheib, Elie Guinot, Pierre Grégoire Levy, Franck Trojette, Faouzi Diouf, Momar Slama, Michel Dupont, Hervé |
author_sort | Duwat, Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a useful tool for minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU. Dynamic indices (such as the inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC)) can be used to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Although quantitative use of the dIVC has been validated, the routinely used qualitative (visual) approach had not been assessed before the present study. METHODS: Qualitative and quantitative assessments of the dIVC were compared in a prospective, observational study. After operators with differing levels in critical care echocardiography had derived a qualitative dIVC, the last (expert) operator performed a standard, numeric measurement of the dIVC (referred to as the quantitative dIVC). Two groups of patients were separated into two groups: group (dIVC < 18%) and group (dIVC ≥ 18%). RESULTS: In total, 114 patients were assessed for inclusion, and 97 (63 men and 34 women) were included. The mean sensitivity and specificity values for qualitative assessment of the dIVC by an intensivist were 80.7% and 93.7%, respectively. A qualitative evaluation detected all quantitative dIVCs >40%. Most of the errors concerned quantitative dIVCs of between 15% and 30%. In the dIVC <18% group, two qualitative evaluation errors were noted for quantitative dIVCs of between 0 and 10%. The average of positive predictive values and negative predictive values for qualitative assessment of the dIVC by residents, intensivists and cardiologists were 83%, 83%, and 90%; and 92%, 94%, and 90%, respectively. The Fleiss kappa for all operators was estimated to be 0.68, corresponding to substantial agreement. CONCLUSION: The qualitative dIVC is a rather easy and reliable assessment for extreme numeric values. It has a gray zone between 15% and 30%. The highest and lowest limitations of the gray area are rather tedious to define. Despite reliability of the qualitative assessment when it comes to extreme to numerical values, the quantitative dIVC measurement must always be done within a hemodynamic assessment for intensive care patients. The qualitative approach can be easily integrated into a fast hemodynamic evaluation by using portable ultrasound scanner for out-of-hospital patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4057089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40570892014-06-14 The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients Duwat, Antoine Zogheib, Elie Guinot, Pierre Grégoire Levy, Franck Trojette, Faouzi Diouf, Momar Slama, Michel Dupont, Hervé Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a useful tool for minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU. Dynamic indices (such as the inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC)) can be used to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Although quantitative use of the dIVC has been validated, the routinely used qualitative (visual) approach had not been assessed before the present study. METHODS: Qualitative and quantitative assessments of the dIVC were compared in a prospective, observational study. After operators with differing levels in critical care echocardiography had derived a qualitative dIVC, the last (expert) operator performed a standard, numeric measurement of the dIVC (referred to as the quantitative dIVC). Two groups of patients were separated into two groups: group (dIVC < 18%) and group (dIVC ≥ 18%). RESULTS: In total, 114 patients were assessed for inclusion, and 97 (63 men and 34 women) were included. The mean sensitivity and specificity values for qualitative assessment of the dIVC by an intensivist were 80.7% and 93.7%, respectively. A qualitative evaluation detected all quantitative dIVCs >40%. Most of the errors concerned quantitative dIVCs of between 15% and 30%. In the dIVC <18% group, two qualitative evaluation errors were noted for quantitative dIVCs of between 0 and 10%. The average of positive predictive values and negative predictive values for qualitative assessment of the dIVC by residents, intensivists and cardiologists were 83%, 83%, and 90%; and 92%, 94%, and 90%, respectively. The Fleiss kappa for all operators was estimated to be 0.68, corresponding to substantial agreement. CONCLUSION: The qualitative dIVC is a rather easy and reliable assessment for extreme numeric values. It has a gray zone between 15% and 30%. The highest and lowest limitations of the gray area are rather tedious to define. Despite reliability of the qualitative assessment when it comes to extreme to numerical values, the quantitative dIVC measurement must always be done within a hemodynamic assessment for intensive care patients. The qualitative approach can be easily integrated into a fast hemodynamic evaluation by using portable ultrasound scanner for out-of-hospital patients. BioMed Central 2014-01-14 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4057089/ /pubmed/24423180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13693 Text en © Duwat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Duwat, Antoine Zogheib, Elie Guinot, Pierre Grégoire Levy, Franck Trojette, Faouzi Diouf, Momar Slama, Michel Dupont, Hervé The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients |
title | The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients |
title_full | The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients |
title_fullStr | The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients |
title_full_unstemmed | The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients |
title_short | The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients |
title_sort | gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in icu patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13693 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duwatantoine thegrayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT zogheibelie thegrayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT guinotpierregregoire thegrayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT levyfranck thegrayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT trojettefaouzi thegrayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT dioufmomar thegrayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT slamamichel thegrayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT dupontherve thegrayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT duwatantoine grayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT zogheibelie grayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT guinotpierregregoire grayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT levyfranck grayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT trojettefaouzi grayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT dioufmomar grayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT slamamichel grayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients AT dupontherve grayzoneofthequalitativeassessmentofrespiratorychangesininferiorvenacavadiameterinicupatients |