Cargando…

Neurofilaments as a plasma biomarker for ICU-acquired weakness: an observational pilot study

INTRODUCTION: Early diagnosis of intensive care unit – acquired weakness (ICU-AW) using the current reference standard, that is, assessment of muscle strength, is often hampered due to impaired consciousness. Biological markers could solve this problem but have been scarcely investigated. We hypothe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wieske, Luuk, Witteveen, Esther, Petzold, Axel, Verhamme, Camiel, Schultz, Marcus J, van Schaik, Ivo N, Horn, Janneke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24443841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13699
_version_ 1782320926756438016
author Wieske, Luuk
Witteveen, Esther
Petzold, Axel
Verhamme, Camiel
Schultz, Marcus J
van Schaik, Ivo N
Horn, Janneke
author_facet Wieske, Luuk
Witteveen, Esther
Petzold, Axel
Verhamme, Camiel
Schultz, Marcus J
van Schaik, Ivo N
Horn, Janneke
author_sort Wieske, Luuk
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Early diagnosis of intensive care unit – acquired weakness (ICU-AW) using the current reference standard, that is, assessment of muscle strength, is often hampered due to impaired consciousness. Biological markers could solve this problem but have been scarcely investigated. We hypothesized that plasma levels of neurofilaments are elevated in ICU-AW and can diagnose ICU-AW before muscle strength assessment is possible. METHODS: For this prospective observational cohort study, neurofilament levels were measured using ELISA (NfH(SMI35) antibody) in daily plasma samples (index test). When patients were awake and attentive, ICU-AW was diagnosed using the Medical Research Council scale (reference standard). Differences and discriminative power (using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC) of highest and cumulative (calculated using the area under the neurofilament curve) neurofilament levels were investigated in relation to the moment of muscle strength assessment for each patient. RESULTS: Both the index test and reference standard were available for 77 ICU patients. A total of 18 patients (23%) fulfilled the clinical criteria for ICU-AW. Peak neurofilament levels were higher in patients with ICU-AW and had good discriminative power (AUC: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.97). However, neurofilament levels did not peak before muscle strength assessment was possible. Highest or cumulative neurofilament levels measured before muscle strength assessment could not diagnose ICU-AW (AUC 0.59; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.80 and AUC 0.57; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.81, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma neurofilament levels are raised in ICU-AW and may serve as a biological marker for ICU-AW. However, our study suggests that an early diagnosis of ICU-AW, before muscle strength assessment, is not possible using neurofilament levels in plasma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/cc13699) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40572402014-06-14 Neurofilaments as a plasma biomarker for ICU-acquired weakness: an observational pilot study Wieske, Luuk Witteveen, Esther Petzold, Axel Verhamme, Camiel Schultz, Marcus J van Schaik, Ivo N Horn, Janneke Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Early diagnosis of intensive care unit – acquired weakness (ICU-AW) using the current reference standard, that is, assessment of muscle strength, is often hampered due to impaired consciousness. Biological markers could solve this problem but have been scarcely investigated. We hypothesized that plasma levels of neurofilaments are elevated in ICU-AW and can diagnose ICU-AW before muscle strength assessment is possible. METHODS: For this prospective observational cohort study, neurofilament levels were measured using ELISA (NfH(SMI35) antibody) in daily plasma samples (index test). When patients were awake and attentive, ICU-AW was diagnosed using the Medical Research Council scale (reference standard). Differences and discriminative power (using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC) of highest and cumulative (calculated using the area under the neurofilament curve) neurofilament levels were investigated in relation to the moment of muscle strength assessment for each patient. RESULTS: Both the index test and reference standard were available for 77 ICU patients. A total of 18 patients (23%) fulfilled the clinical criteria for ICU-AW. Peak neurofilament levels were higher in patients with ICU-AW and had good discriminative power (AUC: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.97). However, neurofilament levels did not peak before muscle strength assessment was possible. Highest or cumulative neurofilament levels measured before muscle strength assessment could not diagnose ICU-AW (AUC 0.59; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.80 and AUC 0.57; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.81, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma neurofilament levels are raised in ICU-AW and may serve as a biological marker for ICU-AW. However, our study suggests that an early diagnosis of ICU-AW, before muscle strength assessment, is not possible using neurofilament levels in plasma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/cc13699) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-01-20 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4057240/ /pubmed/24443841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13699 Text en © Wieske et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wieske, Luuk
Witteveen, Esther
Petzold, Axel
Verhamme, Camiel
Schultz, Marcus J
van Schaik, Ivo N
Horn, Janneke
Neurofilaments as a plasma biomarker for ICU-acquired weakness: an observational pilot study
title Neurofilaments as a plasma biomarker for ICU-acquired weakness: an observational pilot study
title_full Neurofilaments as a plasma biomarker for ICU-acquired weakness: an observational pilot study
title_fullStr Neurofilaments as a plasma biomarker for ICU-acquired weakness: an observational pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Neurofilaments as a plasma biomarker for ICU-acquired weakness: an observational pilot study
title_short Neurofilaments as a plasma biomarker for ICU-acquired weakness: an observational pilot study
title_sort neurofilaments as a plasma biomarker for icu-acquired weakness: an observational pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24443841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13699
work_keys_str_mv AT wieskeluuk neurofilamentsasaplasmabiomarkerforicuacquiredweaknessanobservationalpilotstudy
AT witteveenesther neurofilamentsasaplasmabiomarkerforicuacquiredweaknessanobservationalpilotstudy
AT petzoldaxel neurofilamentsasaplasmabiomarkerforicuacquiredweaknessanobservationalpilotstudy
AT verhammecamiel neurofilamentsasaplasmabiomarkerforicuacquiredweaknessanobservationalpilotstudy
AT schultzmarcusj neurofilamentsasaplasmabiomarkerforicuacquiredweaknessanobservationalpilotstudy
AT vanschaikivon neurofilamentsasaplasmabiomarkerforicuacquiredweaknessanobservationalpilotstudy
AT hornjanneke neurofilamentsasaplasmabiomarkerforicuacquiredweaknessanobservationalpilotstudy