Cargando…

Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements via three different tonometers: the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen(®) XL (TPXL), and a non-contact airpuff tonometer (NCT). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 200 eyes from 200 patients. Right eyes o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yilmaz, Ihsan, Altan, Cigdem, Aygit, Ebru Demet, Alagoz, Cengiz, Baz, Okkes, Ahmet, Sibel, Urvasizoglu, Semih, Yasa, Dilek, Demirok, Ahmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944507
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S6391
_version_ 1782320941631537152
author Yilmaz, Ihsan
Altan, Cigdem
Aygit, Ebru Demet
Alagoz, Cengiz
Baz, Okkes
Ahmet, Sibel
Urvasizoglu, Semih
Yasa, Dilek
Demirok, Ahmet
author_facet Yilmaz, Ihsan
Altan, Cigdem
Aygit, Ebru Demet
Alagoz, Cengiz
Baz, Okkes
Ahmet, Sibel
Urvasizoglu, Semih
Yasa, Dilek
Demirok, Ahmet
author_sort Yilmaz, Ihsan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements via three different tonometers: the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen(®) XL (TPXL), and a non-contact airpuff tonometer (NCT). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 200 eyes from 200 patients. Right eyes of all patients were included in this study. IOP was measured via GAT, NCT, and TPXL by three physicians. Each physician used one of the tonometers. Measurements via the three devices were compared. RESULTS: The mean IOP was 15.5±2.2 mmHg (range 10–22) with the GAT, 16.1±3.0 (range 9–25) with the TPXL, and 16.1±2.8 (range 10–26) with the NCT. Bland–Altman analysis showed that the mean difference between measurements from the NCT and the GAT was 0.6±2.3 mmHg. The mean difference between the TPXL and GAT measurements was 0.7±2.5 mmHg. The mean difference between the NCT and TPXL measurements was −0.02±3.0 mmHg. There was no significant difference between the groups according to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. P-values were 0.998 for NCT–TPXL, 0.067 for NCT–GAT, and 0.059 for TPXL–GAT. CONCLUSION: The NCT and TPXL provide IOP measurements comparable to those of the gold standard GAT in normotensive eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40573232014-06-18 Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL Yilmaz, Ihsan Altan, Cigdem Aygit, Ebru Demet Alagoz, Cengiz Baz, Okkes Ahmet, Sibel Urvasizoglu, Semih Yasa, Dilek Demirok, Ahmet Clin Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements via three different tonometers: the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen(®) XL (TPXL), and a non-contact airpuff tonometer (NCT). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 200 eyes from 200 patients. Right eyes of all patients were included in this study. IOP was measured via GAT, NCT, and TPXL by three physicians. Each physician used one of the tonometers. Measurements via the three devices were compared. RESULTS: The mean IOP was 15.5±2.2 mmHg (range 10–22) with the GAT, 16.1±3.0 (range 9–25) with the TPXL, and 16.1±2.8 (range 10–26) with the NCT. Bland–Altman analysis showed that the mean difference between measurements from the NCT and the GAT was 0.6±2.3 mmHg. The mean difference between the TPXL and GAT measurements was 0.7±2.5 mmHg. The mean difference between the NCT and TPXL measurements was −0.02±3.0 mmHg. There was no significant difference between the groups according to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. P-values were 0.998 for NCT–TPXL, 0.067 for NCT–GAT, and 0.059 for TPXL–GAT. CONCLUSION: The NCT and TPXL provide IOP measurements comparable to those of the gold standard GAT in normotensive eyes. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4057323/ /pubmed/24944507 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S6391 Text en © 2014 Yilmaz et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yilmaz, Ihsan
Altan, Cigdem
Aygit, Ebru Demet
Alagoz, Cengiz
Baz, Okkes
Ahmet, Sibel
Urvasizoglu, Semih
Yasa, Dilek
Demirok, Ahmet
Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
title Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
title_full Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
title_fullStr Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
title_short Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
title_sort comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and tono-pen xl
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944507
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S6391
work_keys_str_mv AT yilmazihsan comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl
AT altancigdem comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl
AT aygitebrudemet comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl
AT alagozcengiz comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl
AT bazokkes comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl
AT ahmetsibel comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl
AT urvasizoglusemih comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl
AT yasadilek comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl
AT demirokahmet comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl