Cargando…
Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements via three different tonometers: the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen(®) XL (TPXL), and a non-contact airpuff tonometer (NCT). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 200 eyes from 200 patients. Right eyes o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944507 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S6391 |
_version_ | 1782320941631537152 |
---|---|
author | Yilmaz, Ihsan Altan, Cigdem Aygit, Ebru Demet Alagoz, Cengiz Baz, Okkes Ahmet, Sibel Urvasizoglu, Semih Yasa, Dilek Demirok, Ahmet |
author_facet | Yilmaz, Ihsan Altan, Cigdem Aygit, Ebru Demet Alagoz, Cengiz Baz, Okkes Ahmet, Sibel Urvasizoglu, Semih Yasa, Dilek Demirok, Ahmet |
author_sort | Yilmaz, Ihsan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements via three different tonometers: the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen(®) XL (TPXL), and a non-contact airpuff tonometer (NCT). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 200 eyes from 200 patients. Right eyes of all patients were included in this study. IOP was measured via GAT, NCT, and TPXL by three physicians. Each physician used one of the tonometers. Measurements via the three devices were compared. RESULTS: The mean IOP was 15.5±2.2 mmHg (range 10–22) with the GAT, 16.1±3.0 (range 9–25) with the TPXL, and 16.1±2.8 (range 10–26) with the NCT. Bland–Altman analysis showed that the mean difference between measurements from the NCT and the GAT was 0.6±2.3 mmHg. The mean difference between the TPXL and GAT measurements was 0.7±2.5 mmHg. The mean difference between the NCT and TPXL measurements was −0.02±3.0 mmHg. There was no significant difference between the groups according to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. P-values were 0.998 for NCT–TPXL, 0.067 for NCT–GAT, and 0.059 for TPXL–GAT. CONCLUSION: The NCT and TPXL provide IOP measurements comparable to those of the gold standard GAT in normotensive eyes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4057323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40573232014-06-18 Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL Yilmaz, Ihsan Altan, Cigdem Aygit, Ebru Demet Alagoz, Cengiz Baz, Okkes Ahmet, Sibel Urvasizoglu, Semih Yasa, Dilek Demirok, Ahmet Clin Ophthalmol Original Research OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements via three different tonometers: the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the Tono-Pen(®) XL (TPXL), and a non-contact airpuff tonometer (NCT). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 200 eyes from 200 patients. Right eyes of all patients were included in this study. IOP was measured via GAT, NCT, and TPXL by three physicians. Each physician used one of the tonometers. Measurements via the three devices were compared. RESULTS: The mean IOP was 15.5±2.2 mmHg (range 10–22) with the GAT, 16.1±3.0 (range 9–25) with the TPXL, and 16.1±2.8 (range 10–26) with the NCT. Bland–Altman analysis showed that the mean difference between measurements from the NCT and the GAT was 0.6±2.3 mmHg. The mean difference between the TPXL and GAT measurements was 0.7±2.5 mmHg. The mean difference between the NCT and TPXL measurements was −0.02±3.0 mmHg. There was no significant difference between the groups according to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. P-values were 0.998 for NCT–TPXL, 0.067 for NCT–GAT, and 0.059 for TPXL–GAT. CONCLUSION: The NCT and TPXL provide IOP measurements comparable to those of the gold standard GAT in normotensive eyes. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4057323/ /pubmed/24944507 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S6391 Text en © 2014 Yilmaz et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yilmaz, Ihsan Altan, Cigdem Aygit, Ebru Demet Alagoz, Cengiz Baz, Okkes Ahmet, Sibel Urvasizoglu, Semih Yasa, Dilek Demirok, Ahmet Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL |
title | Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL |
title_full | Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL |
title_short | Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL |
title_sort | comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and tono-pen xl |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944507 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S6391 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yilmazihsan comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl AT altancigdem comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl AT aygitebrudemet comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl AT alagozcengiz comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl AT bazokkes comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl AT ahmetsibel comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl AT urvasizoglusemih comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl AT yasadilek comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl AT demirokahmet comparisonofthreemethodsoftonometryinnormalsubjectsgoldmannapplanationtonometernoncontactairpufftonometerandtonopenxl |