Cargando…

Preference for Different Anchor Descriptors on Visual Analogue Scales among Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain

CONTEXT: Although many previous studies have examined the preference of patients for different pain measurement scales, preference for anchor descriptors has not been thoroughly discussed. OBJECTIVES: To examine (1) the preferred end-phrases used in the VAS as anchor labels for Japanese patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yokobe, Junya, Kitahara, Masaki, Matsushima, Masato, Uezono, Shoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24927424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099891
_version_ 1782320951897096192
author Yokobe, Junya
Kitahara, Masaki
Matsushima, Masato
Uezono, Shoichi
author_facet Yokobe, Junya
Kitahara, Masaki
Matsushima, Masato
Uezono, Shoichi
author_sort Yokobe, Junya
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Although many previous studies have examined the preference of patients for different pain measurement scales, preference for anchor descriptors has not been thoroughly discussed. OBJECTIVES: To examine (1) the preferred end-phrases used in the VAS as anchor labels for Japanese patients with chronic pain, and (2) whether the preference differs according to factors such as age, sex, educational level, duration of pain, and pain intensity. METHODS: We performed an observational study in patients suffering from non-cancer chronic pain for more than 3 months at a pain center in Japan. The patients were asked to rate their pain intensity using four types of VAS that used the following different anchor descriptors: “worst pain” (“Worst”), “worst pain bearable” (“Bearable”), “worst pain imaginable” (“Imaginable”), and “worst pain you have ever experienced” (“Experienced”). They were also asked to rank the four scales according to ease of responding, and asked which descriptor best reflected their perceived pain. RESULTS: In total, 183 patients participated in the study. They consisted of 119 (65.0%) women and 64 (35.0%) men aged 18–84 years with the mean age of 56.9 years. “Experienced” was most preferred (69.8%), followed by “Bearable” (66.3%), “Worst” (48.8%), and “Imaginable” (16.9%). Factors such as age, sex, educational background, duration of pain, and pain intensity did not significantly affect the results. In 83.1% of patients, the preferred descriptor corresponded to the descriptor that best reflected patients' perceived pain. CONCLUSION: The frequently used expression “worst pain imaginable” is considered to be difficult to understand for most patients. Widely preferred descriptors, such as “worst pain you have ever experienced” and “worst pain bearable”, should be used when evaluating perceived pain. The preference of anchor descriptors was not significantly affected by the factors such as age, sex, educational level, duration of pain, and pain intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40573872014-06-18 Preference for Different Anchor Descriptors on Visual Analogue Scales among Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain Yokobe, Junya Kitahara, Masaki Matsushima, Masato Uezono, Shoichi PLoS One Research Article CONTEXT: Although many previous studies have examined the preference of patients for different pain measurement scales, preference for anchor descriptors has not been thoroughly discussed. OBJECTIVES: To examine (1) the preferred end-phrases used in the VAS as anchor labels for Japanese patients with chronic pain, and (2) whether the preference differs according to factors such as age, sex, educational level, duration of pain, and pain intensity. METHODS: We performed an observational study in patients suffering from non-cancer chronic pain for more than 3 months at a pain center in Japan. The patients were asked to rate their pain intensity using four types of VAS that used the following different anchor descriptors: “worst pain” (“Worst”), “worst pain bearable” (“Bearable”), “worst pain imaginable” (“Imaginable”), and “worst pain you have ever experienced” (“Experienced”). They were also asked to rank the four scales according to ease of responding, and asked which descriptor best reflected their perceived pain. RESULTS: In total, 183 patients participated in the study. They consisted of 119 (65.0%) women and 64 (35.0%) men aged 18–84 years with the mean age of 56.9 years. “Experienced” was most preferred (69.8%), followed by “Bearable” (66.3%), “Worst” (48.8%), and “Imaginable” (16.9%). Factors such as age, sex, educational background, duration of pain, and pain intensity did not significantly affect the results. In 83.1% of patients, the preferred descriptor corresponded to the descriptor that best reflected patients' perceived pain. CONCLUSION: The frequently used expression “worst pain imaginable” is considered to be difficult to understand for most patients. Widely preferred descriptors, such as “worst pain you have ever experienced” and “worst pain bearable”, should be used when evaluating perceived pain. The preference of anchor descriptors was not significantly affected by the factors such as age, sex, educational level, duration of pain, and pain intensity. Public Library of Science 2014-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4057387/ /pubmed/24927424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099891 Text en © 2014 Yokobe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yokobe, Junya
Kitahara, Masaki
Matsushima, Masato
Uezono, Shoichi
Preference for Different Anchor Descriptors on Visual Analogue Scales among Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain
title Preference for Different Anchor Descriptors on Visual Analogue Scales among Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain
title_full Preference for Different Anchor Descriptors on Visual Analogue Scales among Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain
title_fullStr Preference for Different Anchor Descriptors on Visual Analogue Scales among Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain
title_full_unstemmed Preference for Different Anchor Descriptors on Visual Analogue Scales among Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain
title_short Preference for Different Anchor Descriptors on Visual Analogue Scales among Japanese Patients with Chronic Pain
title_sort preference for different anchor descriptors on visual analogue scales among japanese patients with chronic pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24927424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099891
work_keys_str_mv AT yokobejunya preferencefordifferentanchordescriptorsonvisualanaloguescalesamongjapanesepatientswithchronicpain
AT kitaharamasaki preferencefordifferentanchordescriptorsonvisualanaloguescalesamongjapanesepatientswithchronicpain
AT matsushimamasato preferencefordifferentanchordescriptorsonvisualanaloguescalesamongjapanesepatientswithchronicpain
AT uezonoshoichi preferencefordifferentanchordescriptorsonvisualanaloguescalesamongjapanesepatientswithchronicpain