Cargando…

The subxiphoid view cannot replace the apical view for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic status

INTRODUCTION: This prospective study aimed to assess whether use of the subxiphoid acoustic window in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can be an accurate alternative in the absence of an apical view to assess hemodynamic parameters. METHODS: This prospective study took place in a teaching hospit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maizel, Julien, Salhi, Ahmed, Tribouilloy, Christophe, Massy, Ziad A, Choukroun, Gabriel, Slama, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12869
_version_ 1782320954156777472
author Maizel, Julien
Salhi, Ahmed
Tribouilloy, Christophe
Massy, Ziad A
Choukroun, Gabriel
Slama, Michel
author_facet Maizel, Julien
Salhi, Ahmed
Tribouilloy, Christophe
Massy, Ziad A
Choukroun, Gabriel
Slama, Michel
author_sort Maizel, Julien
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This prospective study aimed to assess whether use of the subxiphoid acoustic window in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can be an accurate alternative in the absence of an apical view to assess hemodynamic parameters. METHODS: This prospective study took place in a teaching hospital medical ICU. Over a 4-month period, TTE was performed in patients admitted for more than 24 hours. Two operators rated the quality of parasternal, apical, and subxiphoid acoustic windows as Excellent, Good, Acceptable, Poor, or No image. In the subpopulation presenting adequate (rated as acceptable or higher) apical and subxiphoid views, we compared the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the ratio between right and left ventricular end-diastolic areas (RVEDA/LVEDA), the ratio between early and late mitral inflow on pulsed Doppler (E/A ratio), the aortic velocity time integral (Ao VTI), and the ratio between early mitral inflow and displacement of the mitral annulus on tissue Doppler imaging (E/Ea ratio). RESULTS: An adequate apical view was obtained in 80%, and an adequate subxiphoid view was obtained in 63% of the 107 patients included. Only 5% of patients presented an adequate subxiphoid view without an adequate apical view. In the subpopulation of patients with adequate apical and subxiphoid windows (n = 65), LVEF, E/A, and RVEDA/LVEDA were comparable on both views, and were strongly correlated (r > 0.80) with acceptable biases and precision. However, the Ao VTI and the E/Ea ratio were lower on the subxiphoid view than on the apical view (18 ± 5 versus 16 ± 5 cm and 9.6 ± 4.6 versus 7.6 ± 4 cm, respectively, P = 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: An adequate TTE subxiphoid window was obtained in fewer than two thirds of ICU patients. In addition to the classic indication for the subxiphoid window to study the vena cava and pericardium, this view can be used to study right and left ventricular morphology and function, but does not provide accurate hemodynamic Doppler information. ICU echocardiographers should therefore record both apical and subxiphoid views to assess comprehensively the cardiac function and hemodynamic status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40573972014-06-14 The subxiphoid view cannot replace the apical view for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic status Maizel, Julien Salhi, Ahmed Tribouilloy, Christophe Massy, Ziad A Choukroun, Gabriel Slama, Michel Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: This prospective study aimed to assess whether use of the subxiphoid acoustic window in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can be an accurate alternative in the absence of an apical view to assess hemodynamic parameters. METHODS: This prospective study took place in a teaching hospital medical ICU. Over a 4-month period, TTE was performed in patients admitted for more than 24 hours. Two operators rated the quality of parasternal, apical, and subxiphoid acoustic windows as Excellent, Good, Acceptable, Poor, or No image. In the subpopulation presenting adequate (rated as acceptable or higher) apical and subxiphoid views, we compared the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the ratio between right and left ventricular end-diastolic areas (RVEDA/LVEDA), the ratio between early and late mitral inflow on pulsed Doppler (E/A ratio), the aortic velocity time integral (Ao VTI), and the ratio between early mitral inflow and displacement of the mitral annulus on tissue Doppler imaging (E/Ea ratio). RESULTS: An adequate apical view was obtained in 80%, and an adequate subxiphoid view was obtained in 63% of the 107 patients included. Only 5% of patients presented an adequate subxiphoid view without an adequate apical view. In the subpopulation of patients with adequate apical and subxiphoid windows (n = 65), LVEF, E/A, and RVEDA/LVEDA were comparable on both views, and were strongly correlated (r > 0.80) with acceptable biases and precision. However, the Ao VTI and the E/Ea ratio were lower on the subxiphoid view than on the apical view (18 ± 5 versus 16 ± 5 cm and 9.6 ± 4.6 versus 7.6 ± 4 cm, respectively, P = 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: An adequate TTE subxiphoid window was obtained in fewer than two thirds of ICU patients. In addition to the classic indication for the subxiphoid window to study the vena cava and pericardium, this view can be used to study right and left ventricular morphology and function, but does not provide accurate hemodynamic Doppler information. ICU echocardiographers should therefore record both apical and subxiphoid views to assess comprehensively the cardiac function and hemodynamic status. BioMed Central 2013 2013-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4057397/ /pubmed/24004960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12869 Text en Copyright © 2013 Maizel et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Maizel, Julien
Salhi, Ahmed
Tribouilloy, Christophe
Massy, Ziad A
Choukroun, Gabriel
Slama, Michel
The subxiphoid view cannot replace the apical view for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic status
title The subxiphoid view cannot replace the apical view for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic status
title_full The subxiphoid view cannot replace the apical view for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic status
title_fullStr The subxiphoid view cannot replace the apical view for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic status
title_full_unstemmed The subxiphoid view cannot replace the apical view for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic status
title_short The subxiphoid view cannot replace the apical view for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic status
title_sort subxiphoid view cannot replace the apical view for transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic status
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12869
work_keys_str_mv AT maizeljulien thesubxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT salhiahmed thesubxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT tribouilloychristophe thesubxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT massyziada thesubxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT choukroungabriel thesubxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT slamamichel thesubxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT maizeljulien subxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT salhiahmed subxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT tribouilloychristophe subxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT massyziada subxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT choukroungabriel subxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus
AT slamamichel subxiphoidviewcannotreplacetheapicalviewfortransthoracicechocardiographicassessmentofhemodynamicstatus