Cargando…

The anti-inflammatory effect of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide 19-2.5 in a murine sepsis model: a prospective randomized study

INTRODUCTION: Increasing rates of multi-resistant bacteria are a major problem in the treatment of critically ill patients. Furthermore, conventional antibiotics lead to the release of bacterial derived membrane parts initiating pro-inflammatory cascades with potential harm to the patient. Antimicro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuerholz, Tobias, Doemming, Sabine, Hornef, Mathias, Martin, Lukas, Simon, Tim-Philipp, Heinbockel, Lena, Brandenburg, Klaus, Marx, Gernot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11920
_version_ 1782320956703768576
author Schuerholz, Tobias
Doemming, Sabine
Hornef, Mathias
Martin, Lukas
Simon, Tim-Philipp
Heinbockel, Lena
Brandenburg, Klaus
Marx, Gernot
author_facet Schuerholz, Tobias
Doemming, Sabine
Hornef, Mathias
Martin, Lukas
Simon, Tim-Philipp
Heinbockel, Lena
Brandenburg, Klaus
Marx, Gernot
author_sort Schuerholz, Tobias
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Increasing rates of multi-resistant bacteria are a major problem in the treatment of critically ill patients. Furthermore, conventional antibiotics lead to the release of bacterial derived membrane parts initiating pro-inflammatory cascades with potential harm to the patient. Antimicrobial peptides (AMP) may kill bacteria without releasing pro-inflammatory factors. Thus, we compared three newly developed synthetic anti-lipopolysaccharide peptides (SALPs) with a broader range of efficacy to suppress cytokine release in plasma and CD14 mRNA expression in organ tissue in a murine, polymicrobial sepsis model. METHODS: A randomized, experimental trial was conducted in an animal research facility. Male NMRI mice (n = 90; 8- to 12-weeks old) were randomized to the following six groups: (i) sham operation and parenteral vehicle (NaCl 0.9%) administration (sham); (ii) cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and vehicle infusion (sepsis-control), (iii) CLP and polymyxin B infusion (polyB), or (iv to vi) CLP and infusion of three different synthetic antimicrobial peptides Peptide 19-2.5 (Pep2.5), Peptide 19-4 (Pep4) or Peptide 19-8 (Pep8). All animals underwent arterial and venous catheterization for hemodynamic monitoring 48 hours prior to CLP or sham-operation. Physical appearance and behavior (activity), plasma cytokine levels, and CD14 mRNA expression in heart, lung, liver, spleen and kidney tissue were determined 24 hours after CLP or sham operation. RESULTS: Only Pep2.5 significantly enhanced the activity after CLP, whereas none of the therapeutic regimens elevated the mean arterial pressure or heart rate. The strongly elevated IL-6, IL-10 and monocyte chemoattractant protein serum levels in septic animals were significantly reduced after Pep2.5 administration (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Similarly, Pep2.5 significantly reduced the sepsis-induced CD14 mRNA expression in heart (P = 0.003), lung (P = 0.008), and spleen tissue (P = 0.009) but not in kidney and liver. CONCLUSIONS: Structurally variable SALPs exhibit major differences in their anti-inflammatory effect in vivo. Continuous parenteral administration of Pep2.5 is able to reduce sepsis-induced cytokine release and tissue inflammation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40574082014-06-14 The anti-inflammatory effect of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide 19-2.5 in a murine sepsis model: a prospective randomized study Schuerholz, Tobias Doemming, Sabine Hornef, Mathias Martin, Lukas Simon, Tim-Philipp Heinbockel, Lena Brandenburg, Klaus Marx, Gernot Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Increasing rates of multi-resistant bacteria are a major problem in the treatment of critically ill patients. Furthermore, conventional antibiotics lead to the release of bacterial derived membrane parts initiating pro-inflammatory cascades with potential harm to the patient. Antimicrobial peptides (AMP) may kill bacteria without releasing pro-inflammatory factors. Thus, we compared three newly developed synthetic anti-lipopolysaccharide peptides (SALPs) with a broader range of efficacy to suppress cytokine release in plasma and CD14 mRNA expression in organ tissue in a murine, polymicrobial sepsis model. METHODS: A randomized, experimental trial was conducted in an animal research facility. Male NMRI mice (n = 90; 8- to 12-weeks old) were randomized to the following six groups: (i) sham operation and parenteral vehicle (NaCl 0.9%) administration (sham); (ii) cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and vehicle infusion (sepsis-control), (iii) CLP and polymyxin B infusion (polyB), or (iv to vi) CLP and infusion of three different synthetic antimicrobial peptides Peptide 19-2.5 (Pep2.5), Peptide 19-4 (Pep4) or Peptide 19-8 (Pep8). All animals underwent arterial and venous catheterization for hemodynamic monitoring 48 hours prior to CLP or sham-operation. Physical appearance and behavior (activity), plasma cytokine levels, and CD14 mRNA expression in heart, lung, liver, spleen and kidney tissue were determined 24 hours after CLP or sham operation. RESULTS: Only Pep2.5 significantly enhanced the activity after CLP, whereas none of the therapeutic regimens elevated the mean arterial pressure or heart rate. The strongly elevated IL-6, IL-10 and monocyte chemoattractant protein serum levels in septic animals were significantly reduced after Pep2.5 administration (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Similarly, Pep2.5 significantly reduced the sepsis-induced CD14 mRNA expression in heart (P = 0.003), lung (P = 0.008), and spleen tissue (P = 0.009) but not in kidney and liver. CONCLUSIONS: Structurally variable SALPs exhibit major differences in their anti-inflammatory effect in vivo. Continuous parenteral administration of Pep2.5 is able to reduce sepsis-induced cytokine release and tissue inflammation. BioMed Central 2013 2013-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4057408/ /pubmed/23302299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11920 Text en Copyright © 2013 Schuerholz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Schuerholz, Tobias
Doemming, Sabine
Hornef, Mathias
Martin, Lukas
Simon, Tim-Philipp
Heinbockel, Lena
Brandenburg, Klaus
Marx, Gernot
The anti-inflammatory effect of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide 19-2.5 in a murine sepsis model: a prospective randomized study
title The anti-inflammatory effect of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide 19-2.5 in a murine sepsis model: a prospective randomized study
title_full The anti-inflammatory effect of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide 19-2.5 in a murine sepsis model: a prospective randomized study
title_fullStr The anti-inflammatory effect of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide 19-2.5 in a murine sepsis model: a prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed The anti-inflammatory effect of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide 19-2.5 in a murine sepsis model: a prospective randomized study
title_short The anti-inflammatory effect of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide 19-2.5 in a murine sepsis model: a prospective randomized study
title_sort anti-inflammatory effect of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide 19-2.5 in a murine sepsis model: a prospective randomized study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11920
work_keys_str_mv AT schuerholztobias theantiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT doemmingsabine theantiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT hornefmathias theantiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT martinlukas theantiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT simontimphilipp theantiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT heinbockellena theantiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT brandenburgklaus theantiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT marxgernot theantiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT schuerholztobias antiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT doemmingsabine antiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT hornefmathias antiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT martinlukas antiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT simontimphilipp antiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT heinbockellena antiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT brandenburgklaus antiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT marxgernot antiinflammatoryeffectofthesyntheticantimicrobialpeptide1925inamurinesepsismodelaprospectiverandomizedstudy