Cargando…

Variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in Europe

INTRODUCTION: Organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) has become an accepted strategy to reduce the shortage of organs for transplantation in many European countries. The use and number of DCD donors varies between countries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the available protocols for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wind, Jentina, Faut, Marloes, van Smaalen, Tim C, van Heurn, Ernest LW
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24090229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13034
_version_ 1782320969338060800
author Wind, Jentina
Faut, Marloes
van Smaalen, Tim C
van Heurn, Ernest LW
author_facet Wind, Jentina
Faut, Marloes
van Smaalen, Tim C
van Heurn, Ernest LW
author_sort Wind, Jentina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) has become an accepted strategy to reduce the shortage of organs for transplantation in many European countries. The use and number of DCD donors varies between countries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the available protocols for DCD in Europe. METHODS: We contacted national transplant societies and responsible transplant co-ordinators in the countries that perform DCD to obtain DCD protocols. We compared information on the protocols and additional data including: inclusion and exclusion criteria for donation, legislation, determination of death and preservation methods. RESULTS: In ten European countries DCD is performed, eight of which describe the methods in protocols. There are large differences in used DCD categories, legislation and the way death is determined. Protocols differ in the detail in which DCD procedures are described and the way methods are supported by additional consensus statements and ethical frameworks. CONCLUSIONS: Although DCD is an established strategy to enlarge the donor pool and to contribute to the reduction of the waiting list for transplantation, its potential has not been fully utilized yet. To further promote DCD transplantation, it is important to share expertise and obtain consensus, so that this can be translated into more uniform and solid protocols supported by the competent authorities, transplant and intensive care professionals, which may eventually result in a further promotion of DCD transplantation in Europe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40574692014-06-15 Variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in Europe Wind, Jentina Faut, Marloes van Smaalen, Tim C van Heurn, Ernest LW Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) has become an accepted strategy to reduce the shortage of organs for transplantation in many European countries. The use and number of DCD donors varies between countries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the available protocols for DCD in Europe. METHODS: We contacted national transplant societies and responsible transplant co-ordinators in the countries that perform DCD to obtain DCD protocols. We compared information on the protocols and additional data including: inclusion and exclusion criteria for donation, legislation, determination of death and preservation methods. RESULTS: In ten European countries DCD is performed, eight of which describe the methods in protocols. There are large differences in used DCD categories, legislation and the way death is determined. Protocols differ in the detail in which DCD procedures are described and the way methods are supported by additional consensus statements and ethical frameworks. CONCLUSIONS: Although DCD is an established strategy to enlarge the donor pool and to contribute to the reduction of the waiting list for transplantation, its potential has not been fully utilized yet. To further promote DCD transplantation, it is important to share expertise and obtain consensus, so that this can be translated into more uniform and solid protocols supported by the competent authorities, transplant and intensive care professionals, which may eventually result in a further promotion of DCD transplantation in Europe. BioMed Central 2013 2013-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4057469/ /pubmed/24090229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13034 Text en Copyright © 2013 Wind et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wind, Jentina
Faut, Marloes
van Smaalen, Tim C
van Heurn, Ernest LW
Variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in Europe
title Variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in Europe
title_full Variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in Europe
title_fullStr Variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in Europe
title_short Variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in Europe
title_sort variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in europe
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24090229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13034
work_keys_str_mv AT windjentina variabilityinprotocolsondonationaftercirculatorydeathineurope
AT fautmarloes variabilityinprotocolsondonationaftercirculatorydeathineurope
AT vansmaalentimc variabilityinprotocolsondonationaftercirculatorydeathineurope
AT vanheurnernestlw variabilityinprotocolsondonationaftercirculatorydeathineurope