Cargando…

Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: There are limited data on the efficacy of early fluid resuscitation with third-generation hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130) in burn injury. Adverse effects of HES on survival and organ function have been reported. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, 48 patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Béchir, Markus, Puhan, Milo A, Fasshauer, Mario, Schuepbach, Reto A, Stocker, Reto, Neff, Thomas A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24365167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13168
_version_ 1782320977288364032
author Béchir, Markus
Puhan, Milo A
Fasshauer, Mario
Schuepbach, Reto A
Stocker, Reto
Neff, Thomas A
author_facet Béchir, Markus
Puhan, Milo A
Fasshauer, Mario
Schuepbach, Reto A
Stocker, Reto
Neff, Thomas A
author_sort Béchir, Markus
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There are limited data on the efficacy of early fluid resuscitation with third-generation hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130) in burn injury. Adverse effects of HES on survival and organ function have been reported. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, 48 patients with severe burn injury were assigned to receive either lactated Ringer’s solution plus 6% HES 130/0.4 in a ratio of 2:1 or lactated Ringer’s solution with no colloid supplement for the first 72 hours. Primary outcome parameter was the group difference of administered total fluid from intensive care unit (ICU) admission up to day 3. Secondary outcomes included kidney and lung injury and failure, length of stay, and mortality. RESULTS: Three-day totals of administered resuscitation fluid (medians) were 21,190 mL in the lactated Ringer’s group and 19,535 mL in the HES group (HES: −1,213 mL; P = 0.39). Creatinine levels from day 1 to 3 (HES: +0.4 μmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI) −18.7 to 19.5; P = 0.97) and urinary outputs from day 1 to 3 (HES: −58 mL; 95% CI −400 to 283; P = 0.90) were not different. Six patients in each group developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (risk ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.35 to 2.64; P = 0.95). Length of ICU stay (HES vs. lactated Ringer’s: 28 vs. 24 days; P = 0.80) and length of hospital stay (31 vs. 29 days; P = 0.57) were similar. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 4 patients in each group (risk ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.27 to 4.45; P = 0.95), and in-hospital mortality was 8 in the HES group vs. 5 patients in the lactated Ringer’s group (hazard ratio 1.86; 95% CI 0.56 to 6.19; P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that early fluid resuscitation with balanced HES 130/0.4 (6%) in addition to lactated Ringer’s solution would lead to a volume-sparing effect in severe burn injury. Together with the findings that early renal function, incidence of ARDS, length of stay, and mortality were not negatively influenced by HES in this setting, balanced HES 130/0.4 (6%) plus lactated Ringer’s solution could not be considered superior to lactated Ringer’s solution alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01012648
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40575042014-06-15 Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial Béchir, Markus Puhan, Milo A Fasshauer, Mario Schuepbach, Reto A Stocker, Reto Neff, Thomas A Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: There are limited data on the efficacy of early fluid resuscitation with third-generation hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130) in burn injury. Adverse effects of HES on survival and organ function have been reported. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, 48 patients with severe burn injury were assigned to receive either lactated Ringer’s solution plus 6% HES 130/0.4 in a ratio of 2:1 or lactated Ringer’s solution with no colloid supplement for the first 72 hours. Primary outcome parameter was the group difference of administered total fluid from intensive care unit (ICU) admission up to day 3. Secondary outcomes included kidney and lung injury and failure, length of stay, and mortality. RESULTS: Three-day totals of administered resuscitation fluid (medians) were 21,190 mL in the lactated Ringer’s group and 19,535 mL in the HES group (HES: −1,213 mL; P = 0.39). Creatinine levels from day 1 to 3 (HES: +0.4 μmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI) −18.7 to 19.5; P = 0.97) and urinary outputs from day 1 to 3 (HES: −58 mL; 95% CI −400 to 283; P = 0.90) were not different. Six patients in each group developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (risk ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.35 to 2.64; P = 0.95). Length of ICU stay (HES vs. lactated Ringer’s: 28 vs. 24 days; P = 0.80) and length of hospital stay (31 vs. 29 days; P = 0.57) were similar. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 4 patients in each group (risk ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.27 to 4.45; P = 0.95), and in-hospital mortality was 8 in the HES group vs. 5 patients in the lactated Ringer’s group (hazard ratio 1.86; 95% CI 0.56 to 6.19; P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence that early fluid resuscitation with balanced HES 130/0.4 (6%) in addition to lactated Ringer’s solution would lead to a volume-sparing effect in severe burn injury. Together with the findings that early renal function, incidence of ARDS, length of stay, and mortality were not negatively influenced by HES in this setting, balanced HES 130/0.4 (6%) plus lactated Ringer’s solution could not be considered superior to lactated Ringer’s solution alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01012648 BioMed Central 2013 2013-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4057504/ /pubmed/24365167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13168 Text en Copyright © 2013 Béchir et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Béchir, Markus
Puhan, Milo A
Fasshauer, Mario
Schuepbach, Reto A
Stocker, Reto
Neff, Thomas A
Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial
title Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial
title_full Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial
title_fullStr Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial
title_short Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial
title_sort early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24365167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13168
work_keys_str_mv AT bechirmarkus earlyfluidresuscitationwithhydroxyethylstarch130046insevereburninjuryarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT puhanmiloa earlyfluidresuscitationwithhydroxyethylstarch130046insevereburninjuryarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT fasshauermario earlyfluidresuscitationwithhydroxyethylstarch130046insevereburninjuryarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT schuepbachretoa earlyfluidresuscitationwithhydroxyethylstarch130046insevereburninjuryarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT stockerreto earlyfluidresuscitationwithhydroxyethylstarch130046insevereburninjuryarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT neffthomasa earlyfluidresuscitationwithhydroxyethylstarch130046insevereburninjuryarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindclinicaltrial