Cargando…

A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that higher doses of enoxaparin would improve thromboprophylaxis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Peak anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.1 to 0.4 IU/ml reflect adequate thromboprophylaxis for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Sian, Zincuk, Aleksander, Larsen, Ulla Lei, Ekstrøm, Claus, Nybo, Mads, Rasmussen, Bjarne, Toft, Palle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12684
_version_ 1782320980716158976
author Robinson, Sian
Zincuk, Aleksander
Larsen, Ulla Lei
Ekstrøm, Claus
Nybo, Mads
Rasmussen, Bjarne
Toft, Palle
author_facet Robinson, Sian
Zincuk, Aleksander
Larsen, Ulla Lei
Ekstrøm, Claus
Nybo, Mads
Rasmussen, Bjarne
Toft, Palle
author_sort Robinson, Sian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that higher doses of enoxaparin would improve thromboprophylaxis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Peak anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.1 to 0.4 IU/ml reflect adequate thromboprophylaxis for general ward patients. Studies conducted in orthopaedic patients demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between anti-Xa levels and wound haematoma and thrombosis. Corresponding levels for critically ill patients may well be higher, but have never been validated in large studies. METHODS: Eighty critically ill patients weighing 50 to 90 kilograms were randomised in a double-blinded study to receive subcutaneous (sc) enoxaparin: 40 mg once daily (QD), 30 mg twice daily (BID), 40 mg BID, or 1 mg/kg QD, each administered for three days. Anti-Xa activity was measured at baseline, and daily at 4, 12, 16 and 24 hours post administration. Antithrombin, fibrinogen, and platelets were measured at baseline and twice daily thereafter. RESULTS: Two patients were transferred prior to participation. On day 1, doses of 40 mg QD (n = 20) and 40 mg BID (n = 19) yielded mean peak anti-Xa of 0.20 IU/ml and 0.17 IU/ml respectively. A dose of 30 mg BID (n = 20) resulted in much lower levels (0.08 IU/ml). Patients receiving 1 mg/kg QD (n = 19) achieved near steady-state mean peak anti-Xa levels from day 1 (0.34 IU/ml). At steady state (day 3), mean peak anti-Xa levels of 0.13 IU/ml and 0.15 IU/ml were achieved with doses of 40 mg QD and 30 mg BID respectively. This increased significantly to 0.33 IU/ml and 0.40 IU/ml for doses of 40 mg BID and 1 mg/kg QD respectively. Thus anti-Xa response profiles differed significantly over the three days between enoxaparin treatment groups (P <0.0001). Doses of 40 mg BID and1 mg/kg QD enoxaparin yielded target anti-Xa levels for over 80% of the study period. There were no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 40 mg QD enoxaparin (Europe) or 30 mg BID (North America) yield levels of anti-Xa which may be inadequate for critically ill patients. A weight-based dose yielded the best anti-Xa levels without bioaccumulation, and allowed the establishment of near steady-state levels from the first day of enoxaparin administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91570009.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40575202014-06-15 A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial Robinson, Sian Zincuk, Aleksander Larsen, Ulla Lei Ekstrøm, Claus Nybo, Mads Rasmussen, Bjarne Toft, Palle Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that higher doses of enoxaparin would improve thromboprophylaxis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Peak anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.1 to 0.4 IU/ml reflect adequate thromboprophylaxis for general ward patients. Studies conducted in orthopaedic patients demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between anti-Xa levels and wound haematoma and thrombosis. Corresponding levels for critically ill patients may well be higher, but have never been validated in large studies. METHODS: Eighty critically ill patients weighing 50 to 90 kilograms were randomised in a double-blinded study to receive subcutaneous (sc) enoxaparin: 40 mg once daily (QD), 30 mg twice daily (BID), 40 mg BID, or 1 mg/kg QD, each administered for three days. Anti-Xa activity was measured at baseline, and daily at 4, 12, 16 and 24 hours post administration. Antithrombin, fibrinogen, and platelets were measured at baseline and twice daily thereafter. RESULTS: Two patients were transferred prior to participation. On day 1, doses of 40 mg QD (n = 20) and 40 mg BID (n = 19) yielded mean peak anti-Xa of 0.20 IU/ml and 0.17 IU/ml respectively. A dose of 30 mg BID (n = 20) resulted in much lower levels (0.08 IU/ml). Patients receiving 1 mg/kg QD (n = 19) achieved near steady-state mean peak anti-Xa levels from day 1 (0.34 IU/ml). At steady state (day 3), mean peak anti-Xa levels of 0.13 IU/ml and 0.15 IU/ml were achieved with doses of 40 mg QD and 30 mg BID respectively. This increased significantly to 0.33 IU/ml and 0.40 IU/ml for doses of 40 mg BID and 1 mg/kg QD respectively. Thus anti-Xa response profiles differed significantly over the three days between enoxaparin treatment groups (P <0.0001). Doses of 40 mg BID and1 mg/kg QD enoxaparin yielded target anti-Xa levels for over 80% of the study period. There were no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 40 mg QD enoxaparin (Europe) or 30 mg BID (North America) yield levels of anti-Xa which may be inadequate for critically ill patients. A weight-based dose yielded the best anti-Xa levels without bioaccumulation, and allowed the establishment of near steady-state levels from the first day of enoxaparin administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91570009. BioMed Central 2013 2013-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4057520/ /pubmed/23601744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12684 Text en Copyright © 2013 Robinson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Robinson, Sian
Zincuk, Aleksander
Larsen, Ulla Lei
Ekstrøm, Claus
Nybo, Mads
Rasmussen, Bjarne
Toft, Palle
A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_full A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_short A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12684
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonsian acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zincukaleksander acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT larsenullalei acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ekstrømclaus acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nybomads acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rasmussenbjarne acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT toftpalle acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robinsonsian comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zincukaleksander comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT larsenullalei comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ekstrømclaus comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nybomads comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rasmussenbjarne comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT toftpalle comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial