Cargando…
A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that higher doses of enoxaparin would improve thromboprophylaxis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Peak anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.1 to 0.4 IU/ml reflect adequate thromboprophylaxis for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12684 |
_version_ | 1782320980716158976 |
---|---|
author | Robinson, Sian Zincuk, Aleksander Larsen, Ulla Lei Ekstrøm, Claus Nybo, Mads Rasmussen, Bjarne Toft, Palle |
author_facet | Robinson, Sian Zincuk, Aleksander Larsen, Ulla Lei Ekstrøm, Claus Nybo, Mads Rasmussen, Bjarne Toft, Palle |
author_sort | Robinson, Sian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that higher doses of enoxaparin would improve thromboprophylaxis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Peak anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.1 to 0.4 IU/ml reflect adequate thromboprophylaxis for general ward patients. Studies conducted in orthopaedic patients demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between anti-Xa levels and wound haematoma and thrombosis. Corresponding levels for critically ill patients may well be higher, but have never been validated in large studies. METHODS: Eighty critically ill patients weighing 50 to 90 kilograms were randomised in a double-blinded study to receive subcutaneous (sc) enoxaparin: 40 mg once daily (QD), 30 mg twice daily (BID), 40 mg BID, or 1 mg/kg QD, each administered for three days. Anti-Xa activity was measured at baseline, and daily at 4, 12, 16 and 24 hours post administration. Antithrombin, fibrinogen, and platelets were measured at baseline and twice daily thereafter. RESULTS: Two patients were transferred prior to participation. On day 1, doses of 40 mg QD (n = 20) and 40 mg BID (n = 19) yielded mean peak anti-Xa of 0.20 IU/ml and 0.17 IU/ml respectively. A dose of 30 mg BID (n = 20) resulted in much lower levels (0.08 IU/ml). Patients receiving 1 mg/kg QD (n = 19) achieved near steady-state mean peak anti-Xa levels from day 1 (0.34 IU/ml). At steady state (day 3), mean peak anti-Xa levels of 0.13 IU/ml and 0.15 IU/ml were achieved with doses of 40 mg QD and 30 mg BID respectively. This increased significantly to 0.33 IU/ml and 0.40 IU/ml for doses of 40 mg BID and 1 mg/kg QD respectively. Thus anti-Xa response profiles differed significantly over the three days between enoxaparin treatment groups (P <0.0001). Doses of 40 mg BID and1 mg/kg QD enoxaparin yielded target anti-Xa levels for over 80% of the study period. There were no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 40 mg QD enoxaparin (Europe) or 30 mg BID (North America) yield levels of anti-Xa which may be inadequate for critically ill patients. A weight-based dose yielded the best anti-Xa levels without bioaccumulation, and allowed the establishment of near steady-state levels from the first day of enoxaparin administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91570009. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4057520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40575202014-06-15 A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial Robinson, Sian Zincuk, Aleksander Larsen, Ulla Lei Ekstrøm, Claus Nybo, Mads Rasmussen, Bjarne Toft, Palle Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that higher doses of enoxaparin would improve thromboprophylaxis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Peak anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.1 to 0.4 IU/ml reflect adequate thromboprophylaxis for general ward patients. Studies conducted in orthopaedic patients demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between anti-Xa levels and wound haematoma and thrombosis. Corresponding levels for critically ill patients may well be higher, but have never been validated in large studies. METHODS: Eighty critically ill patients weighing 50 to 90 kilograms were randomised in a double-blinded study to receive subcutaneous (sc) enoxaparin: 40 mg once daily (QD), 30 mg twice daily (BID), 40 mg BID, or 1 mg/kg QD, each administered for three days. Anti-Xa activity was measured at baseline, and daily at 4, 12, 16 and 24 hours post administration. Antithrombin, fibrinogen, and platelets were measured at baseline and twice daily thereafter. RESULTS: Two patients were transferred prior to participation. On day 1, doses of 40 mg QD (n = 20) and 40 mg BID (n = 19) yielded mean peak anti-Xa of 0.20 IU/ml and 0.17 IU/ml respectively. A dose of 30 mg BID (n = 20) resulted in much lower levels (0.08 IU/ml). Patients receiving 1 mg/kg QD (n = 19) achieved near steady-state mean peak anti-Xa levels from day 1 (0.34 IU/ml). At steady state (day 3), mean peak anti-Xa levels of 0.13 IU/ml and 0.15 IU/ml were achieved with doses of 40 mg QD and 30 mg BID respectively. This increased significantly to 0.33 IU/ml and 0.40 IU/ml for doses of 40 mg BID and 1 mg/kg QD respectively. Thus anti-Xa response profiles differed significantly over the three days between enoxaparin treatment groups (P <0.0001). Doses of 40 mg BID and1 mg/kg QD enoxaparin yielded target anti-Xa levels for over 80% of the study period. There were no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 40 mg QD enoxaparin (Europe) or 30 mg BID (North America) yield levels of anti-Xa which may be inadequate for critically ill patients. A weight-based dose yielded the best anti-Xa levels without bioaccumulation, and allowed the establishment of near steady-state levels from the first day of enoxaparin administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91570009. BioMed Central 2013 2013-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4057520/ /pubmed/23601744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12684 Text en Copyright © 2013 Robinson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Robinson, Sian Zincuk, Aleksander Larsen, Ulla Lei Ekstrøm, Claus Nybo, Mads Rasmussen, Bjarne Toft, Palle A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial |
title | A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial |
title_full | A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial |
title_short | A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robinsonsian acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zincukaleksander acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT larsenullalei acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ekstrømclaus acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nybomads acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rasmussenbjarne acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT toftpalle acomparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT robinsonsian comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zincukaleksander comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT larsenullalei comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ekstrømclaus comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nybomads comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rasmussenbjarne comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT toftpalle comparativestudyofvaryingdosesofenoxaparinforthromboprophylaxisincriticallyillpatientsadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrial |