Cargando…

Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010–2012

BACKGROUND: The geographic distribution of canine infection with vector-borne disease agents in the United States appears to be expanding. METHODS: To provide an updated assessment of geographic trends in canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia spp., and Anaplasma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Little, Susan E, Beall, Melissa J, Bowman, Dwight D, Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy, Stamaris, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-257
_version_ 1782320985945407488
author Little, Susan E
Beall, Melissa J
Bowman, Dwight D
Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy
Stamaris, John
author_facet Little, Susan E
Beall, Melissa J
Bowman, Dwight D
Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy
Stamaris, John
author_sort Little, Susan E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The geographic distribution of canine infection with vector-borne disease agents in the United States appears to be expanding. METHODS: To provide an updated assessment of geographic trends in canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia spp., and Anaplasma spp., we evaluated results from an average of 3,588,477 dogs tested annually by veterinarians throughout the United States from 2010 – 2012. RESULTS: As in an earlier summary report, the percent positive test results varied by agent and region, with antigen of D. immitis and antibody to Ehrlichia spp. most commonly identified in the Southeast (2.9% and 3.2%, respectively) and antibody to both B. burgdorferi and Anaplasma spp. most commonly identified in the Northeast (13.3% and 7.1%, respectively) and upper Midwest (4.4% and 3.9%, respectively). Percent positive test results for D. immitis antigen were lower in every region considered, including in the Southeast, than previously reported. Percent positive test results for antibodies to B. burgdorferi and Ehrlichia spp. were higher nationally than previously reported, and, for antibodies to Anaplasma spp., were higher in the Northeast but lower in the Midwest and West, than in the initial report. Annual reports of human cases of Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis, and anaplasmosis were associated with percent positive canine test results by state for each respective tick-borne disease agent (R(2) = 0.701, 0.457, and 0.314, respectively). Within endemic areas, percent positive test results for all three tick-borne agents demonstrated evidence of geographic expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Continued national monitoring of canine test results for vector-borne zoonotic agents is an important tool for accurately mapping the geographic distribution of these agents, and greatly aids our understanding of the veterinary and public health threats they pose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40575652014-06-15 Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010–2012 Little, Susan E Beall, Melissa J Bowman, Dwight D Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy Stamaris, John Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: The geographic distribution of canine infection with vector-borne disease agents in the United States appears to be expanding. METHODS: To provide an updated assessment of geographic trends in canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia spp., and Anaplasma spp., we evaluated results from an average of 3,588,477 dogs tested annually by veterinarians throughout the United States from 2010 – 2012. RESULTS: As in an earlier summary report, the percent positive test results varied by agent and region, with antigen of D. immitis and antibody to Ehrlichia spp. most commonly identified in the Southeast (2.9% and 3.2%, respectively) and antibody to both B. burgdorferi and Anaplasma spp. most commonly identified in the Northeast (13.3% and 7.1%, respectively) and upper Midwest (4.4% and 3.9%, respectively). Percent positive test results for D. immitis antigen were lower in every region considered, including in the Southeast, than previously reported. Percent positive test results for antibodies to B. burgdorferi and Ehrlichia spp. were higher nationally than previously reported, and, for antibodies to Anaplasma spp., were higher in the Northeast but lower in the Midwest and West, than in the initial report. Annual reports of human cases of Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis, and anaplasmosis were associated with percent positive canine test results by state for each respective tick-borne disease agent (R(2) = 0.701, 0.457, and 0.314, respectively). Within endemic areas, percent positive test results for all three tick-borne agents demonstrated evidence of geographic expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Continued national monitoring of canine test results for vector-borne zoonotic agents is an important tool for accurately mapping the geographic distribution of these agents, and greatly aids our understanding of the veterinary and public health threats they pose. BioMed Central 2014-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4057565/ /pubmed/24886589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-257 Text en Copyright © 2014 Little et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Little, Susan E
Beall, Melissa J
Bowman, Dwight D
Chandrashekar, Ramaswamy
Stamaris, John
Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010–2012
title Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010–2012
title_full Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010–2012
title_fullStr Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010–2012
title_full_unstemmed Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010–2012
title_short Canine infection with Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. in the United States, 2010–2012
title_sort canine infection with dirofilaria immitis, borrelia burgdorferi, anaplasma spp., and ehrlichia spp. in the united states, 2010–2012
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-257
work_keys_str_mv AT littlesusane canineinfectionwithdirofilariaimmitisborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppandehrlichiasppintheunitedstates20102012
AT beallmelissaj canineinfectionwithdirofilariaimmitisborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppandehrlichiasppintheunitedstates20102012
AT bowmandwightd canineinfectionwithdirofilariaimmitisborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppandehrlichiasppintheunitedstates20102012
AT chandrashekarramaswamy canineinfectionwithdirofilariaimmitisborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppandehrlichiasppintheunitedstates20102012
AT stamarisjohn canineinfectionwithdirofilariaimmitisborreliaburgdorferianaplasmasppandehrlichiasppintheunitedstates20102012