Cargando…

Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda

BACKGROUND: Over 40% of all deaths among children under 5 are neonatal deaths (0–28 days), and this proportion is increasing. In 2012, 2.9 million newborns died, with 99% occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Many of the countries with the highest neonatal mortality rates globally are curre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morof, Diane F, Kerber, Kate, Tomczyk, Barbara, Lawn, Joy, Blanton, Curtis, Sami, Samira, Amsalu, Ribka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24959198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-8-8
_version_ 1782320989459185664
author Morof, Diane F
Kerber, Kate
Tomczyk, Barbara
Lawn, Joy
Blanton, Curtis
Sami, Samira
Amsalu, Ribka
author_facet Morof, Diane F
Kerber, Kate
Tomczyk, Barbara
Lawn, Joy
Blanton, Curtis
Sami, Samira
Amsalu, Ribka
author_sort Morof, Diane F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over 40% of all deaths among children under 5 are neonatal deaths (0–28 days), and this proportion is increasing. In 2012, 2.9 million newborns died, with 99% occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Many of the countries with the highest neonatal mortality rates globally are currently or have recently been affected by complex humanitarian emergencies. Despite the global burden of neonatal morbidity and mortality and risks inherent in complex emergency situations, research investments are not commensurate to burden and little is known about the epidemiology or best practices for neonatal survival in these settings. METHODS: We used the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology to prioritize research questions on neonatal health in complex humanitarian emergencies. Experts evaluated 35 questions using four criteria (answerability, feasibility, relevance, equity) with three subcomponents per criterion. Using SAS 9.2, a research prioritization score (RPS) and average expert agreement score (AEA) were calculated for each question. RESULTS: Twenty-eight experts evaluated all 35 questions. RPS ranged from 0.846 to 0.679 and the AEA ranged from 0.667 to 0.411. The top ten research priorities covered a range of issues but generally fell into two categories– epidemiologic and programmatic components of neonatal health. The highest ranked question in this survey was “What strategies are effective in increasing demand for, and use of skilled attendance?” CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a diverse group of experts used the CHRNI methodology to systematically identify and determine research priorities for neonatal health and survival in complex humanitarian emergencies. The priorities included the need to better understand the magnitude of the disease burden and interventions to improve neonatal health in complex humanitarian emergencies. The findings from this study will provide guidance to researchers and program implementers in neonatal and complex humanitarian fields to engage on the research priorities needed to save lives most at risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4057580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40575802014-06-23 Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda Morof, Diane F Kerber, Kate Tomczyk, Barbara Lawn, Joy Blanton, Curtis Sami, Samira Amsalu, Ribka Confl Health Research BACKGROUND: Over 40% of all deaths among children under 5 are neonatal deaths (0–28 days), and this proportion is increasing. In 2012, 2.9 million newborns died, with 99% occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Many of the countries with the highest neonatal mortality rates globally are currently or have recently been affected by complex humanitarian emergencies. Despite the global burden of neonatal morbidity and mortality and risks inherent in complex emergency situations, research investments are not commensurate to burden and little is known about the epidemiology or best practices for neonatal survival in these settings. METHODS: We used the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology to prioritize research questions on neonatal health in complex humanitarian emergencies. Experts evaluated 35 questions using four criteria (answerability, feasibility, relevance, equity) with three subcomponents per criterion. Using SAS 9.2, a research prioritization score (RPS) and average expert agreement score (AEA) were calculated for each question. RESULTS: Twenty-eight experts evaluated all 35 questions. RPS ranged from 0.846 to 0.679 and the AEA ranged from 0.667 to 0.411. The top ten research priorities covered a range of issues but generally fell into two categories– epidemiologic and programmatic components of neonatal health. The highest ranked question in this survey was “What strategies are effective in increasing demand for, and use of skilled attendance?” CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a diverse group of experts used the CHRNI methodology to systematically identify and determine research priorities for neonatal health and survival in complex humanitarian emergencies. The priorities included the need to better understand the magnitude of the disease burden and interventions to improve neonatal health in complex humanitarian emergencies. The findings from this study will provide guidance to researchers and program implementers in neonatal and complex humanitarian fields to engage on the research priorities needed to save lives most at risk. BioMed Central 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4057580/ /pubmed/24959198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-8-8 Text en Copyright © 2014 Morof et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Morof, Diane F
Kerber, Kate
Tomczyk, Barbara
Lawn, Joy
Blanton, Curtis
Sami, Samira
Amsalu, Ribka
Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda
title Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda
title_full Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda
title_fullStr Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda
title_short Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda
title_sort neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24959198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-8-8
work_keys_str_mv AT morofdianef neonatalsurvivalincomplexhumanitarianemergenciessettinganevidencebasedresearchagenda
AT kerberkate neonatalsurvivalincomplexhumanitarianemergenciessettinganevidencebasedresearchagenda
AT tomczykbarbara neonatalsurvivalincomplexhumanitarianemergenciessettinganevidencebasedresearchagenda
AT lawnjoy neonatalsurvivalincomplexhumanitarianemergenciessettinganevidencebasedresearchagenda
AT blantoncurtis neonatalsurvivalincomplexhumanitarianemergenciessettinganevidencebasedresearchagenda
AT samisamira neonatalsurvivalincomplexhumanitarianemergenciessettinganevidencebasedresearchagenda
AT amsaluribka neonatalsurvivalincomplexhumanitarianemergenciessettinganevidencebasedresearchagenda