Cargando…
Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Since 2009 some German health insurance companies have implemented integrated mental health care services along the principles of assertive community treatment in collaboration with local mental health service providers across Germany. Focus of this study is the analysis of effectiveness...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-163 |
_version_ | 1782321003951554560 |
---|---|
author | Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Herder, Katrin Helmbrecht, Marina Julia Prinz, Stefanie Walendzik, Julia Holzmann, Marco Becker, Thomas Schützwohl, Matthias Kilian, Reinhold |
author_facet | Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Herder, Katrin Helmbrecht, Marina Julia Prinz, Stefanie Walendzik, Julia Holzmann, Marco Becker, Thomas Schützwohl, Matthias Kilian, Reinhold |
author_sort | Stierlin, Annabel Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Since 2009 some German health insurance companies have implemented integrated mental health care services along the principles of assertive community treatment in collaboration with local mental health service providers across Germany. Focus of this study is the analysis of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this integrated care programme compared to care as usual in routine care surroundings in five regions in Germany. METHODS: In this 18-month multi-centre observational trial 250 patients enrolled in an integrated mental health care programme and 250 patients who receive treatment as usual from five catchment areas will be included. In addition, in each group about 125 relatives of the participating patients will be included. The primary outcome criterion is the improvement of empowerment; secondary outcomes are subjective quality of life, functional impairment and costs of illness. Data will be collected at baseline and three follow-ups after 6, 12 and 18 months. Data will be analysed by means of mixed effects regression models. Propensity score methods are used for selection bias control. DISCUSSION: Study results are expected to provide information about how integrated care programmes in their present form contribute to the improvement of mental health care. In addition, the study will provide hints to weaknesses of the current integrated care programme and options to overcome them. The major strengths of this study are the real-world character of the study intervention with a simultaneous high level of academic rigour. However, the fact that patients are not randomised to study groups and that there is no blinding might limit the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00005111. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4057655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40576552014-06-15 Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Herder, Katrin Helmbrecht, Marina Julia Prinz, Stefanie Walendzik, Julia Holzmann, Marco Becker, Thomas Schützwohl, Matthias Kilian, Reinhold BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Since 2009 some German health insurance companies have implemented integrated mental health care services along the principles of assertive community treatment in collaboration with local mental health service providers across Germany. Focus of this study is the analysis of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this integrated care programme compared to care as usual in routine care surroundings in five regions in Germany. METHODS: In this 18-month multi-centre observational trial 250 patients enrolled in an integrated mental health care programme and 250 patients who receive treatment as usual from five catchment areas will be included. In addition, in each group about 125 relatives of the participating patients will be included. The primary outcome criterion is the improvement of empowerment; secondary outcomes are subjective quality of life, functional impairment and costs of illness. Data will be collected at baseline and three follow-ups after 6, 12 and 18 months. Data will be analysed by means of mixed effects regression models. Propensity score methods are used for selection bias control. DISCUSSION: Study results are expected to provide information about how integrated care programmes in their present form contribute to the improvement of mental health care. In addition, the study will provide hints to weaknesses of the current integrated care programme and options to overcome them. The major strengths of this study are the real-world character of the study intervention with a simultaneous high level of academic rigour. However, the fact that patients are not randomised to study groups and that there is no blinding might limit the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00005111. BioMed Central 2014-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4057655/ /pubmed/24894310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-163 Text en Copyright © 2014 Stierlin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Herder, Katrin Helmbrecht, Marina Julia Prinz, Stefanie Walendzik, Julia Holzmann, Marco Becker, Thomas Schützwohl, Matthias Kilian, Reinhold Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4057655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24894310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stierlinannabelsandra effectivenessandefficiencyofintegratedmentalhealthcareprogrammesingermanystudyprotocolofanobservationalcontrolledtrial AT herderkatrin effectivenessandefficiencyofintegratedmentalhealthcareprogrammesingermanystudyprotocolofanobservationalcontrolledtrial AT helmbrechtmarinajulia effectivenessandefficiencyofintegratedmentalhealthcareprogrammesingermanystudyprotocolofanobservationalcontrolledtrial AT prinzstefanie effectivenessandefficiencyofintegratedmentalhealthcareprogrammesingermanystudyprotocolofanobservationalcontrolledtrial AT walendzikjulia effectivenessandefficiencyofintegratedmentalhealthcareprogrammesingermanystudyprotocolofanobservationalcontrolledtrial AT holzmannmarco effectivenessandefficiencyofintegratedmentalhealthcareprogrammesingermanystudyprotocolofanobservationalcontrolledtrial AT beckerthomas effectivenessandefficiencyofintegratedmentalhealthcareprogrammesingermanystudyprotocolofanobservationalcontrolledtrial AT schutzwohlmatthias effectivenessandefficiencyofintegratedmentalhealthcareprogrammesingermanystudyprotocolofanobservationalcontrolledtrial AT kilianreinhold effectivenessandefficiencyofintegratedmentalhealthcareprogrammesingermanystudyprotocolofanobservationalcontrolledtrial |