Cargando…

Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Toothbrush Disinfection: An In Vitro Study

Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection. Methods. Two-hundred eighty toothbrushes were included in the study. The toothbrushes were divided into 7 groups and were contaminated by standardized suspensions of Lactobacillus rhamnosus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peker, Ilkay, Akca, Gulcin, Sarikir, Cigdem, Toraman Alkurt, Meryem, Celik, Irem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4058182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24971388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/726190
_version_ 1782321088821198848
author Peker, Ilkay
Akca, Gulcin
Sarikir, Cigdem
Toraman Alkurt, Meryem
Celik, Irem
author_facet Peker, Ilkay
Akca, Gulcin
Sarikir, Cigdem
Toraman Alkurt, Meryem
Celik, Irem
author_sort Peker, Ilkay
collection PubMed
description Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection. Methods. Two-hundred eighty toothbrushes were included in the study. The toothbrushes were divided into 7 groups and were contaminated by standardized suspensions of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus), Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Escherichia coli (E. coli). The following disinfectants were tested: 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 100% and 50% white vinegar, microwave (MW) oven, ultraviolet (UV) sanitizer, and mouth rinse-containing propolis (MCP). Data were analyzed with Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's tests. Results. Statistically significant differences were found between different methods and control group for all tested bacteria. There were statistically significant differences between all test groups for all microorganisms. MW was the most effective for L. rhamnosus and 100% white vinegar was the most effective method for S. mutans and S. aureus. NaOCl was the most effective for E. coli. Conclusion. This study showed that 100% white vinegar was considered to be effective for tested microorganisms. Similarly, 1% NaOCl is cost-effective, easily accessible, and comparatively effective for toothbrush disinfection. Because these agents are nontoxic, cost-effective and easily accessible, they may be appropriate for household use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4058182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40581822014-06-26 Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Toothbrush Disinfection: An In Vitro Study Peker, Ilkay Akca, Gulcin Sarikir, Cigdem Toraman Alkurt, Meryem Celik, Irem ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection. Methods. Two-hundred eighty toothbrushes were included in the study. The toothbrushes were divided into 7 groups and were contaminated by standardized suspensions of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus), Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Escherichia coli (E. coli). The following disinfectants were tested: 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 100% and 50% white vinegar, microwave (MW) oven, ultraviolet (UV) sanitizer, and mouth rinse-containing propolis (MCP). Data were analyzed with Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's tests. Results. Statistically significant differences were found between different methods and control group for all tested bacteria. There were statistically significant differences between all test groups for all microorganisms. MW was the most effective for L. rhamnosus and 100% white vinegar was the most effective method for S. mutans and S. aureus. NaOCl was the most effective for E. coli. Conclusion. This study showed that 100% white vinegar was considered to be effective for tested microorganisms. Similarly, 1% NaOCl is cost-effective, easily accessible, and comparatively effective for toothbrush disinfection. Because these agents are nontoxic, cost-effective and easily accessible, they may be appropriate for household use. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4058182/ /pubmed/24971388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/726190 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ilkay Peker et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peker, Ilkay
Akca, Gulcin
Sarikir, Cigdem
Toraman Alkurt, Meryem
Celik, Irem
Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Toothbrush Disinfection: An In Vitro Study
title Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Toothbrush Disinfection: An In Vitro Study
title_full Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Toothbrush Disinfection: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Toothbrush Disinfection: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Toothbrush Disinfection: An In Vitro Study
title_short Effectiveness of Alternative Methods for Toothbrush Disinfection: An In Vitro Study
title_sort effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4058182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24971388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/726190
work_keys_str_mv AT pekerilkay effectivenessofalternativemethodsfortoothbrushdisinfectionaninvitrostudy
AT akcagulcin effectivenessofalternativemethodsfortoothbrushdisinfectionaninvitrostudy
AT sarikircigdem effectivenessofalternativemethodsfortoothbrushdisinfectionaninvitrostudy
AT toramanalkurtmeryem effectivenessofalternativemethodsfortoothbrushdisinfectionaninvitrostudy
AT celikirem effectivenessofalternativemethodsfortoothbrushdisinfectionaninvitrostudy