Cargando…

Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)underestimation diagnosed after an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (US-14G-CNB) of breast masses and to compare the clinical and imaging characteristics between trueDCIS and underestimated DCIS ide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sung Hee, Kim, Min Jung, Kim, Soo Jin, Kim, Eun-Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4058978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24936506
http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.13028
_version_ 1782321197708476416
author Park, Sung Hee
Kim, Min Jung
Kim, Soo Jin
Kim, Eun-Kyung
author_facet Park, Sung Hee
Kim, Min Jung
Kim, Soo Jin
Kim, Eun-Kyung
author_sort Park, Sung Hee
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)underestimation diagnosed after an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (US-14G-CNB) of breast masses and to compare the clinical and imaging characteristics between trueDCIS and underestimated DCIS identified following surgical excision. METHODS: Among 3,124 US-14G-CNBs performed for breast masses, 69 lesions in 60 patients were pathologically-determined to be pure DCIS. We classified these patients according to the final pathology after surgical excision as those with invasive ductal carcinoma (underestimated group) and those with DCIS (non-underestimated group). We retrospectively reviewed and compared the clinical and imaging characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 69 lesions, 21 were shown after surgery to be invasive carcinomas; the rateof DCIS underestimation was 30.4%. There were no statistically significant differences withrespect to the clinical symptoms, age, lesion size, mammographic findings, and ultrasonographic findings except for the presence of abnormal axillary lymph nodes as detected on ultrasound. The lesions in 2 patients in the non-underestimated group (2/41, 4.9%) and 5 patients in the underestimated group (5/19, 26.3%) were associated with abnormal lymph nodes on axillary ultrasound, and the presence of abnormal axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound was tatistically significant (P=0.016). CONCLUSION: We found a 30.4% rate of DCIS underestimation in breast masses based on a US-14G-CNB. The presence of abnormal lymph nodes as detected on axillary ultrasound may be useful to preoperatively predict underestimation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4058978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40589782014-06-16 Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively? Park, Sung Hee Kim, Min Jung Kim, Soo Jin Kim, Eun-Kyung Ultrasonography Original Article PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)underestimation diagnosed after an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (US-14G-CNB) of breast masses and to compare the clinical and imaging characteristics between trueDCIS and underestimated DCIS identified following surgical excision. METHODS: Among 3,124 US-14G-CNBs performed for breast masses, 69 lesions in 60 patients were pathologically-determined to be pure DCIS. We classified these patients according to the final pathology after surgical excision as those with invasive ductal carcinoma (underestimated group) and those with DCIS (non-underestimated group). We retrospectively reviewed and compared the clinical and imaging characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 69 lesions, 21 were shown after surgery to be invasive carcinomas; the rateof DCIS underestimation was 30.4%. There were no statistically significant differences withrespect to the clinical symptoms, age, lesion size, mammographic findings, and ultrasonographic findings except for the presence of abnormal axillary lymph nodes as detected on ultrasound. The lesions in 2 patients in the non-underestimated group (2/41, 4.9%) and 5 patients in the underestimated group (5/19, 26.3%) were associated with abnormal lymph nodes on axillary ultrasound, and the presence of abnormal axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound was tatistically significant (P=0.016). CONCLUSION: We found a 30.4% rate of DCIS underestimation in breast masses based on a US-14G-CNB. The presence of abnormal lymph nodes as detected on axillary ultrasound may be useful to preoperatively predict underestimation. Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2014-04 2014-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4058978/ /pubmed/24936506 http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.13028 Text en Copyright © 2014 Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (KSUM) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Sung Hee
Kim, Min Jung
Kim, Soo Jin
Kim, Eun-Kyung
Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?
title Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?
title_full Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?
title_fullStr Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?
title_full_unstemmed Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?
title_short Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?
title_sort ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4058978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24936506
http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.13028
work_keys_str_mv AT parksunghee ductalcarcinomainsitudiagnosedusinganultrasoundguided14gaugecoreneedlebiopsyofbreastmassescanunderestimationbepredictedpreoperatively
AT kimminjung ductalcarcinomainsitudiagnosedusinganultrasoundguided14gaugecoreneedlebiopsyofbreastmassescanunderestimationbepredictedpreoperatively
AT kimsoojin ductalcarcinomainsitudiagnosedusinganultrasoundguided14gaugecoreneedlebiopsyofbreastmassescanunderestimationbepredictedpreoperatively
AT kimeunkyung ductalcarcinomainsitudiagnosedusinganultrasoundguided14gaugecoreneedlebiopsyofbreastmassescanunderestimationbepredictedpreoperatively