Cargando…
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
BACKGROUND: The number of systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) has increased dramatically in China over the past decades. However, evaluation of quality of reporting of systematic reviews published has not been undertaken. The objective of this study is to evaluate the quality of reporting o...
Autores principales: | Li, Jin-long, Ge, Long, Ma, Ji-chun, Zeng, Qiao-ling, Yao, Lu, An, Ni, Ding, Jie-xian, Gan, Yu-hong, Tian, Jin-hui |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24906805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-58 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?
por: Wu, Taixiang, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of meta-analyses of observational studies published in Chinese journals
por: Zhang, Zhe-wen, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine
por: Wang, Ling, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
The Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses in Diagnostic Tests Published by Authors in China
por: Ge, Long, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Epidemiology, Quality and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine Interventions Published in Chinese Journals
por: Ma, Bin, et al.
Publicado: (2011)