Cargando…

A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates

Investigating the endophytic bacterial community in special moss species is fundamental to understanding the microbial-plant interactions and discovering the bacteria with stresses tolerance. Thus, the community structure of endophytic bacteria in the xerophilous moss Grimmia montana were estimated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiao Lei, Liu, Su Lin, Liu, Min, Kong, Bi He, Liu, Lei, Li, Yan Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24948927
_version_ 1782321227759616000
author Liu, Xiao Lei
Liu, Su Lin
Liu, Min
Kong, Bi He
Liu, Lei
Li, Yan Hong
author_facet Liu, Xiao Lei
Liu, Su Lin
Liu, Min
Kong, Bi He
Liu, Lei
Li, Yan Hong
author_sort Liu, Xiao Lei
collection PubMed
description Investigating the endophytic bacterial community in special moss species is fundamental to understanding the microbial-plant interactions and discovering the bacteria with stresses tolerance. Thus, the community structure of endophytic bacteria in the xerophilous moss Grimmia montana were estimated using a 16S rDNA library and traditional cultivation methods. In total, 212 sequences derived from the 16S rDNA library were used to assess the bacterial diversity. Sequence alignment showed that the endophytes were assigned to 54 genera in 4 phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Cytophaga/Flexibacter/Bacteroids). Of them, the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria (45.9%) and Firmicutes (27.6%), the most abundant genera included Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Leclercia, Microvirga, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Planococcus, Paenisporosarcina and Planomicrobium. In addition, a total of 14 species belonging to 8 genera in 3 phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria) were isolated, Curtobacterium, Massilia, Pseudomonas and Sphingomonas were the dominant genera. Although some of the genera isolated were inconsistent with those detected by molecular method, both of two methods proved that many different endophytic bacteria coexist in G. montana. According to the potential functional analyses of these bacteria, some species are known to have possible beneficial effects on hosts, but whether this is the case in G. montana needs to be confirmed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4059291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40592912014-06-19 A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates Liu, Xiao Lei Liu, Su Lin Liu, Min Kong, Bi He Liu, Lei Li, Yan Hong Braz J Microbiol Research Paper Investigating the endophytic bacterial community in special moss species is fundamental to understanding the microbial-plant interactions and discovering the bacteria with stresses tolerance. Thus, the community structure of endophytic bacteria in the xerophilous moss Grimmia montana were estimated using a 16S rDNA library and traditional cultivation methods. In total, 212 sequences derived from the 16S rDNA library were used to assess the bacterial diversity. Sequence alignment showed that the endophytes were assigned to 54 genera in 4 phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Cytophaga/Flexibacter/Bacteroids). Of them, the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria (45.9%) and Firmicutes (27.6%), the most abundant genera included Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Leclercia, Microvirga, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Planococcus, Paenisporosarcina and Planomicrobium. In addition, a total of 14 species belonging to 8 genera in 3 phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria) were isolated, Curtobacterium, Massilia, Pseudomonas and Sphingomonas were the dominant genera. Although some of the genera isolated were inconsistent with those detected by molecular method, both of two methods proved that many different endophytic bacteria coexist in G. montana. According to the potential functional analyses of these bacteria, some species are known to have possible beneficial effects on hosts, but whether this is the case in G. montana needs to be confirmed. Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2014-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4059291/ /pubmed/24948927 Text en Copyright © 2014, Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia All the content of the journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Liu, Xiao Lei
Liu, Su Lin
Liu, Min
Kong, Bi He
Liu, Lei
Li, Yan Hong
A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates
title A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates
title_full A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates
title_fullStr A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates
title_full_unstemmed A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates
title_short A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates
title_sort primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24948927
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiaolei aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT liusulin aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT liumin aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT kongbihe aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT liulei aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT liyanhong aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT liuxiaolei primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT liusulin primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT liumin primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT kongbihe primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT liulei primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates
AT liyanhong primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates