Cargando…
A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates
Investigating the endophytic bacterial community in special moss species is fundamental to understanding the microbial-plant interactions and discovering the bacteria with stresses tolerance. Thus, the community structure of endophytic bacteria in the xerophilous moss Grimmia montana were estimated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24948927 |
_version_ | 1782321227759616000 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xiao Lei Liu, Su Lin Liu, Min Kong, Bi He Liu, Lei Li, Yan Hong |
author_facet | Liu, Xiao Lei Liu, Su Lin Liu, Min Kong, Bi He Liu, Lei Li, Yan Hong |
author_sort | Liu, Xiao Lei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Investigating the endophytic bacterial community in special moss species is fundamental to understanding the microbial-plant interactions and discovering the bacteria with stresses tolerance. Thus, the community structure of endophytic bacteria in the xerophilous moss Grimmia montana were estimated using a 16S rDNA library and traditional cultivation methods. In total, 212 sequences derived from the 16S rDNA library were used to assess the bacterial diversity. Sequence alignment showed that the endophytes were assigned to 54 genera in 4 phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Cytophaga/Flexibacter/Bacteroids). Of them, the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria (45.9%) and Firmicutes (27.6%), the most abundant genera included Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Leclercia, Microvirga, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Planococcus, Paenisporosarcina and Planomicrobium. In addition, a total of 14 species belonging to 8 genera in 3 phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria) were isolated, Curtobacterium, Massilia, Pseudomonas and Sphingomonas were the dominant genera. Although some of the genera isolated were inconsistent with those detected by molecular method, both of two methods proved that many different endophytic bacteria coexist in G. montana. According to the potential functional analyses of these bacteria, some species are known to have possible beneficial effects on hosts, but whether this is the case in G. montana needs to be confirmed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4059291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40592912014-06-19 A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates Liu, Xiao Lei Liu, Su Lin Liu, Min Kong, Bi He Liu, Lei Li, Yan Hong Braz J Microbiol Research Paper Investigating the endophytic bacterial community in special moss species is fundamental to understanding the microbial-plant interactions and discovering the bacteria with stresses tolerance. Thus, the community structure of endophytic bacteria in the xerophilous moss Grimmia montana were estimated using a 16S rDNA library and traditional cultivation methods. In total, 212 sequences derived from the 16S rDNA library were used to assess the bacterial diversity. Sequence alignment showed that the endophytes were assigned to 54 genera in 4 phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Cytophaga/Flexibacter/Bacteroids). Of them, the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria (45.9%) and Firmicutes (27.6%), the most abundant genera included Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Leclercia, Microvirga, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Planococcus, Paenisporosarcina and Planomicrobium. In addition, a total of 14 species belonging to 8 genera in 3 phyla (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria) were isolated, Curtobacterium, Massilia, Pseudomonas and Sphingomonas were the dominant genera. Although some of the genera isolated were inconsistent with those detected by molecular method, both of two methods proved that many different endophytic bacteria coexist in G. montana. According to the potential functional analyses of these bacteria, some species are known to have possible beneficial effects on hosts, but whether this is the case in G. montana needs to be confirmed. Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2014-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4059291/ /pubmed/24948927 Text en Copyright © 2014, Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia All the content of the journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Liu, Xiao Lei Liu, Su Lin Liu, Min Kong, Bi He Liu, Lei Li, Yan Hong A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates |
title | A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates |
title_full | A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates |
title_fullStr | A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates |
title_full_unstemmed | A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates |
title_short | A primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (Grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates |
title_sort | primary assessment of the endophytic bacterial community in a xerophilous moss (grimmia montana) using molecular method and cultivated isolates |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24948927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxiaolei aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT liusulin aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT liumin aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT kongbihe aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT liulei aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT liyanhong aprimaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT liuxiaolei primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT liusulin primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT liumin primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT kongbihe primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT liulei primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates AT liyanhong primaryassessmentoftheendophyticbacterialcommunityinaxerophilousmossgrimmiamontanausingmolecularmethodandcultivatedisolates |