Cargando…

The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that betel-quid is one of the most commonly used psychoactive substances worldwide and a major risk-factor for head-and-neck cancer incidence and mortality globally, currently no standardized instrument is available to assess the reasons why individuals chew betel-quid....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Little, Melissa A, Pokhrel, Pallav, Murphy, Kelle L, Kawamoto, Crissy T, Suguitan, Gil S, Herzog, Thaddeus A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24889863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-62
_version_ 1782321245736402944
author Little, Melissa A
Pokhrel, Pallav
Murphy, Kelle L
Kawamoto, Crissy T
Suguitan, Gil S
Herzog, Thaddeus A
author_facet Little, Melissa A
Pokhrel, Pallav
Murphy, Kelle L
Kawamoto, Crissy T
Suguitan, Gil S
Herzog, Thaddeus A
author_sort Little, Melissa A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that betel-quid is one of the most commonly used psychoactive substances worldwide and a major risk-factor for head-and-neck cancer incidence and mortality globally, currently no standardized instrument is available to assess the reasons why individuals chew betel-quid. A measure to assess reasons for chewing betel-quid could help researchers and clinicians develop prevention and treatment strategies. In the current study, we sought to develop and evaluate a self-report instrument for assessing the reasons for chewing betel quid which contributes toward the goal of developing effective interventions to reduce betel quid chewing in vulnerable populations. METHODS: The current study assessed the factor structure, reliability and convergent validity of the Reasons for Betel-quid Chewing Scale (RBCS), a newly developed 10 item measure adapted from several existing “reasons for smoking” scales. The measure was administered to 351 adult betel-quid chewers in Guam. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis of this measure revealed a three factor structure: reinforcement, social/cultural, and stimulation. Further tests revealed strong support for the internal consistency and convergent validity of this three factor measure. CONCLUSION: The goal of designing an intervention to reduce betel-quid chewing necessitates an understanding of why chewers chew; the current study makes considerable contributions towards that objective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4059468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40594682014-06-17 The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity Little, Melissa A Pokhrel, Pallav Murphy, Kelle L Kawamoto, Crissy T Suguitan, Gil S Herzog, Thaddeus A BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that betel-quid is one of the most commonly used psychoactive substances worldwide and a major risk-factor for head-and-neck cancer incidence and mortality globally, currently no standardized instrument is available to assess the reasons why individuals chew betel-quid. A measure to assess reasons for chewing betel-quid could help researchers and clinicians develop prevention and treatment strategies. In the current study, we sought to develop and evaluate a self-report instrument for assessing the reasons for chewing betel quid which contributes toward the goal of developing effective interventions to reduce betel quid chewing in vulnerable populations. METHODS: The current study assessed the factor structure, reliability and convergent validity of the Reasons for Betel-quid Chewing Scale (RBCS), a newly developed 10 item measure adapted from several existing “reasons for smoking” scales. The measure was administered to 351 adult betel-quid chewers in Guam. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis of this measure revealed a three factor structure: reinforcement, social/cultural, and stimulation. Further tests revealed strong support for the internal consistency and convergent validity of this three factor measure. CONCLUSION: The goal of designing an intervention to reduce betel-quid chewing necessitates an understanding of why chewers chew; the current study makes considerable contributions towards that objective. BioMed Central 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4059468/ /pubmed/24889863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-62 Text en Copyright © 2014 Little et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Little, Melissa A
Pokhrel, Pallav
Murphy, Kelle L
Kawamoto, Crissy T
Suguitan, Gil S
Herzog, Thaddeus A
The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
title The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
title_full The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
title_fullStr The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
title_full_unstemmed The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
title_short The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
title_sort reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24889863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-62
work_keys_str_mv AT littlemelissaa thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT pokhrelpallav thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT murphykellel thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT kawamotocrissyt thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT suguitangils thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT herzogthaddeusa thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT littlemelissaa reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT pokhrelpallav reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT murphykellel reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT kawamotocrissyt reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT suguitangils reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity
AT herzogthaddeusa reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity