Cargando…
The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that betel-quid is one of the most commonly used psychoactive substances worldwide and a major risk-factor for head-and-neck cancer incidence and mortality globally, currently no standardized instrument is available to assess the reasons why individuals chew betel-quid....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24889863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-62 |
_version_ | 1782321245736402944 |
---|---|
author | Little, Melissa A Pokhrel, Pallav Murphy, Kelle L Kawamoto, Crissy T Suguitan, Gil S Herzog, Thaddeus A |
author_facet | Little, Melissa A Pokhrel, Pallav Murphy, Kelle L Kawamoto, Crissy T Suguitan, Gil S Herzog, Thaddeus A |
author_sort | Little, Melissa A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that betel-quid is one of the most commonly used psychoactive substances worldwide and a major risk-factor for head-and-neck cancer incidence and mortality globally, currently no standardized instrument is available to assess the reasons why individuals chew betel-quid. A measure to assess reasons for chewing betel-quid could help researchers and clinicians develop prevention and treatment strategies. In the current study, we sought to develop and evaluate a self-report instrument for assessing the reasons for chewing betel quid which contributes toward the goal of developing effective interventions to reduce betel quid chewing in vulnerable populations. METHODS: The current study assessed the factor structure, reliability and convergent validity of the Reasons for Betel-quid Chewing Scale (RBCS), a newly developed 10 item measure adapted from several existing “reasons for smoking” scales. The measure was administered to 351 adult betel-quid chewers in Guam. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis of this measure revealed a three factor structure: reinforcement, social/cultural, and stimulation. Further tests revealed strong support for the internal consistency and convergent validity of this three factor measure. CONCLUSION: The goal of designing an intervention to reduce betel-quid chewing necessitates an understanding of why chewers chew; the current study makes considerable contributions towards that objective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4059468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40594682014-06-17 The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity Little, Melissa A Pokhrel, Pallav Murphy, Kelle L Kawamoto, Crissy T Suguitan, Gil S Herzog, Thaddeus A BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that betel-quid is one of the most commonly used psychoactive substances worldwide and a major risk-factor for head-and-neck cancer incidence and mortality globally, currently no standardized instrument is available to assess the reasons why individuals chew betel-quid. A measure to assess reasons for chewing betel-quid could help researchers and clinicians develop prevention and treatment strategies. In the current study, we sought to develop and evaluate a self-report instrument for assessing the reasons for chewing betel quid which contributes toward the goal of developing effective interventions to reduce betel quid chewing in vulnerable populations. METHODS: The current study assessed the factor structure, reliability and convergent validity of the Reasons for Betel-quid Chewing Scale (RBCS), a newly developed 10 item measure adapted from several existing “reasons for smoking” scales. The measure was administered to 351 adult betel-quid chewers in Guam. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis of this measure revealed a three factor structure: reinforcement, social/cultural, and stimulation. Further tests revealed strong support for the internal consistency and convergent validity of this three factor measure. CONCLUSION: The goal of designing an intervention to reduce betel-quid chewing necessitates an understanding of why chewers chew; the current study makes considerable contributions towards that objective. BioMed Central 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4059468/ /pubmed/24889863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-62 Text en Copyright © 2014 Little et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Little, Melissa A Pokhrel, Pallav Murphy, Kelle L Kawamoto, Crissy T Suguitan, Gil S Herzog, Thaddeus A The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity |
title | The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity |
title_full | The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity |
title_fullStr | The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity |
title_full_unstemmed | The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity |
title_short | The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity |
title_sort | reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4059468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24889863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-62 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT littlemelissaa thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT pokhrelpallav thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT murphykellel thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT kawamotocrissyt thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT suguitangils thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT herzogthaddeusa thereasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT littlemelissaa reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT pokhrelpallav reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT murphykellel reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT kawamotocrissyt reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT suguitangils reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity AT herzogthaddeusa reasonsforbetelquidchewingscaleassessmentoffactorstructurereliabilityandvalidity |