Cargando…

Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20) and were luted wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graiff, Lorenzo, Rasera, Laura, Calabrese, Marco, Vigolo, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571
_version_ 1782321371892678656
author Graiff, Lorenzo
Rasera, Laura
Calabrese, Marco
Vigolo, Paolo
author_facet Graiff, Lorenzo
Rasera, Laura
Calabrese, Marco
Vigolo, Paolo
author_sort Graiff, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20) and were luted with a dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and with a dual-polymerizing resin cement (RelyX ARC). This was carried out in association with a dual-polymerizing adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) in simulated plexiglass root canals after receiving three different pretreatment procedures. A pull-out test was performed on each sample to measure bond strengths. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Two samples from each group were processed for SEM observations in order to investigate the morphologic aspect of the post/cement interface. Both resin cements demonstrated significant different bond strength values (P < 0.0001). The surface treatment result was also statistically significant (P = 0.0465). SEM examination showed a modification of the post surface after pretreatment with methyl methacrylate. The dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement achieved higher MPa bond strength values. The use of methyl methacrylate as a surface treatment of glass fiber posts provided a significant increase in bond strengths between the posts and both luting materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4060424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40604242014-07-01 Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods Graiff, Lorenzo Rasera, Laura Calabrese, Marco Vigolo, Paolo Int J Dent Research Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20) and were luted with a dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and with a dual-polymerizing resin cement (RelyX ARC). This was carried out in association with a dual-polymerizing adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) in simulated plexiglass root canals after receiving three different pretreatment procedures. A pull-out test was performed on each sample to measure bond strengths. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Two samples from each group were processed for SEM observations in order to investigate the morphologic aspect of the post/cement interface. Both resin cements demonstrated significant different bond strength values (P < 0.0001). The surface treatment result was also statistically significant (P = 0.0465). SEM examination showed a modification of the post surface after pretreatment with methyl methacrylate. The dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement achieved higher MPa bond strength values. The use of methyl methacrylate as a surface treatment of glass fiber posts provided a significant increase in bond strengths between the posts and both luting materials. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4060424/ /pubmed/24987418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lorenzo Graiff et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Graiff, Lorenzo
Rasera, Laura
Calabrese, Marco
Vigolo, Paolo
Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_full Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_fullStr Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_full_unstemmed Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_short Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_sort bonding effectiveness of two adhesive luting cements to glass fiber posts: pull-out evaluation of three different post surface conditioning methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571
work_keys_str_mv AT graifflorenzo bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods
AT raseralaura bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods
AT calabresemarco bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods
AT vigolopaolo bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods