Cargando…
Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20) and were luted wi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571 |
_version_ | 1782321371892678656 |
---|---|
author | Graiff, Lorenzo Rasera, Laura Calabrese, Marco Vigolo, Paolo |
author_facet | Graiff, Lorenzo Rasera, Laura Calabrese, Marco Vigolo, Paolo |
author_sort | Graiff, Lorenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20) and were luted with a dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and with a dual-polymerizing resin cement (RelyX ARC). This was carried out in association with a dual-polymerizing adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) in simulated plexiglass root canals after receiving three different pretreatment procedures. A pull-out test was performed on each sample to measure bond strengths. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Two samples from each group were processed for SEM observations in order to investigate the morphologic aspect of the post/cement interface. Both resin cements demonstrated significant different bond strength values (P < 0.0001). The surface treatment result was also statistically significant (P = 0.0465). SEM examination showed a modification of the post surface after pretreatment with methyl methacrylate. The dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement achieved higher MPa bond strength values. The use of methyl methacrylate as a surface treatment of glass fiber posts provided a significant increase in bond strengths between the posts and both luting materials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4060424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40604242014-07-01 Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods Graiff, Lorenzo Rasera, Laura Calabrese, Marco Vigolo, Paolo Int J Dent Research Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 20) and were luted with a dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and with a dual-polymerizing resin cement (RelyX ARC). This was carried out in association with a dual-polymerizing adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) in simulated plexiglass root canals after receiving three different pretreatment procedures. A pull-out test was performed on each sample to measure bond strengths. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Two samples from each group were processed for SEM observations in order to investigate the morphologic aspect of the post/cement interface. Both resin cements demonstrated significant different bond strength values (P < 0.0001). The surface treatment result was also statistically significant (P = 0.0465). SEM examination showed a modification of the post surface after pretreatment with methyl methacrylate. The dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement achieved higher MPa bond strength values. The use of methyl methacrylate as a surface treatment of glass fiber posts provided a significant increase in bond strengths between the posts and both luting materials. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4060424/ /pubmed/24987418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lorenzo Graiff et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Graiff, Lorenzo Rasera, Laura Calabrese, Marco Vigolo, Paolo Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_full | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_fullStr | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_short | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_sort | bonding effectiveness of two adhesive luting cements to glass fiber posts: pull-out evaluation of three different post surface conditioning methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graifflorenzo bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods AT raseralaura bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods AT calabresemarco bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods AT vigolopaolo bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods |