Cargando…

The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition

In this review, structural and functional changes are described in single-species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they var...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ford, E. David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275
_version_ 1782321400347885568
author Ford, E. David
author_facet Ford, E. David
author_sort Ford, E. David
collection PubMed
description In this review, structural and functional changes are described in single-species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they vary between species or growing conditions. This task now falls to researchers in plant architecture. Research in plant architecture has defined three important functions of individual plants that determine the process of canopy development and competition: (i) resource acquisition plasticity; (ii) morphogenetic plasticity; (iii) architectural variation in efficiency of interception and utilization of light. In this review, this research is synthesized into a theory for competition based on five groups of postulates about the functioning of plants in stands. Group 1: competition for light takes place at the level of component foliage and branches. Group 2: the outcome of competition is determined by the dynamic interaction between processes that exert dominance and processes that react to suppression. Group 3: species differences may affect both exertion of dominance and reaction to suppression. Group 4: individual plants may simultaneously exhibit, in different component parts, resource acquisition and morphogenetic plasticity. Group 5: mortality is a time-delayed response to suppression. Development of architectural models when combined with field investigations is identifying research needed to develop a theory of architectural influences on the competition process. These include analyses of the integration of foliage and branch components into whole-plant growth and precise definitions of environmental control of morphogenetic plasticity and its interaction with acquisition of carbon for plant growth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4060642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40606422014-07-01 The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition Ford, E. David Front Plant Sci Plant Science In this review, structural and functional changes are described in single-species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they vary between species or growing conditions. This task now falls to researchers in plant architecture. Research in plant architecture has defined three important functions of individual plants that determine the process of canopy development and competition: (i) resource acquisition plasticity; (ii) morphogenetic plasticity; (iii) architectural variation in efficiency of interception and utilization of light. In this review, this research is synthesized into a theory for competition based on five groups of postulates about the functioning of plants in stands. Group 1: competition for light takes place at the level of component foliage and branches. Group 2: the outcome of competition is determined by the dynamic interaction between processes that exert dominance and processes that react to suppression. Group 3: species differences may affect both exertion of dominance and reaction to suppression. Group 4: individual plants may simultaneously exhibit, in different component parts, resource acquisition and morphogenetic plasticity. Group 5: mortality is a time-delayed response to suppression. Development of architectural models when combined with field investigations is identifying research needed to develop a theory of architectural influences on the competition process. These include analyses of the integration of foliage and branch components into whole-plant growth and precise definitions of environmental control of morphogenetic plasticity and its interaction with acquisition of carbon for plant growth. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4060642/ /pubmed/24987396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ford. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Ford, E. David
The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_full The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_fullStr The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_full_unstemmed The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_short The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
title_sort dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275
work_keys_str_mv AT fordedavid thedynamicrelationshipbetweenplantarchitectureandcompetition
AT fordedavid dynamicrelationshipbetweenplantarchitectureandcompetition