Cargando…
The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition
In this review, structural and functional changes are described in single-species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they var...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275 |
_version_ | 1782321400347885568 |
---|---|
author | Ford, E. David |
author_facet | Ford, E. David |
author_sort | Ford, E. David |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this review, structural and functional changes are described in single-species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they vary between species or growing conditions. This task now falls to researchers in plant architecture. Research in plant architecture has defined three important functions of individual plants that determine the process of canopy development and competition: (i) resource acquisition plasticity; (ii) morphogenetic plasticity; (iii) architectural variation in efficiency of interception and utilization of light. In this review, this research is synthesized into a theory for competition based on five groups of postulates about the functioning of plants in stands. Group 1: competition for light takes place at the level of component foliage and branches. Group 2: the outcome of competition is determined by the dynamic interaction between processes that exert dominance and processes that react to suppression. Group 3: species differences may affect both exertion of dominance and reaction to suppression. Group 4: individual plants may simultaneously exhibit, in different component parts, resource acquisition and morphogenetic plasticity. Group 5: mortality is a time-delayed response to suppression. Development of architectural models when combined with field investigations is identifying research needed to develop a theory of architectural influences on the competition process. These include analyses of the integration of foliage and branch components into whole-plant growth and precise definitions of environmental control of morphogenetic plasticity and its interaction with acquisition of carbon for plant growth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4060642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40606422014-07-01 The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition Ford, E. David Front Plant Sci Plant Science In this review, structural and functional changes are described in single-species, even-aged, stands undergoing competition for light. Theories of the competition process as interactions between whole plants have been advanced but have not been successful in explaining these changes and how they vary between species or growing conditions. This task now falls to researchers in plant architecture. Research in plant architecture has defined three important functions of individual plants that determine the process of canopy development and competition: (i) resource acquisition plasticity; (ii) morphogenetic plasticity; (iii) architectural variation in efficiency of interception and utilization of light. In this review, this research is synthesized into a theory for competition based on five groups of postulates about the functioning of plants in stands. Group 1: competition for light takes place at the level of component foliage and branches. Group 2: the outcome of competition is determined by the dynamic interaction between processes that exert dominance and processes that react to suppression. Group 3: species differences may affect both exertion of dominance and reaction to suppression. Group 4: individual plants may simultaneously exhibit, in different component parts, resource acquisition and morphogenetic plasticity. Group 5: mortality is a time-delayed response to suppression. Development of architectural models when combined with field investigations is identifying research needed to develop a theory of architectural influences on the competition process. These include analyses of the integration of foliage and branch components into whole-plant growth and precise definitions of environmental control of morphogenetic plasticity and its interaction with acquisition of carbon for plant growth. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4060642/ /pubmed/24987396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ford. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Ford, E. David The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title | The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_full | The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_fullStr | The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_full_unstemmed | The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_short | The dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
title_sort | dynamic relationship between plant architecture and competition |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24987396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fordedavid thedynamicrelationshipbetweenplantarchitectureandcompetition AT fordedavid dynamicrelationshipbetweenplantarchitectureandcompetition |