Cargando…

Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm

BACKGROUND: The need of a sensory feedback system that would improve users’ acceptance in prostheses is generally recognized. Feedback of hand opening and position are among the most important concerns of prosthetic users. To address the two concerns, this study investigated the human capability to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geng, Bo, Jensen, Winnie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24908048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-97
_version_ 1782321415400194048
author Geng, Bo
Jensen, Winnie
author_facet Geng, Bo
Jensen, Winnie
author_sort Geng, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The need of a sensory feedback system that would improve users’ acceptance in prostheses is generally recognized. Feedback of hand opening and position are among the most important concerns of prosthetic users. To address the two concerns, this study investigated the human capability to identify pulse number and location when electrical stimulation applied on the forearm skin. The pulse number may potentially be used to encode the opening of prosthetic hands and stimulation location to encode finger position. METHODS: Ten able-bodied subjects participated in the study. Three electrodes were placed transversely across the ventral forearm spatially encoding three fingers (i.e., thumb, index, and middle finger). Five different pulse numbers (1, 4, 8, 12, and 20) encoded five levels of hand opening. The study consisted of three experiments. In the three experiments, each after a training session, the subjects were required to identify among: (a) five stimulation locations, (b) five pulse numbers, or (c) ten paired combinations of location and pulse number, respectively. The subjects’ performance in the three identification tasks was evaluated. RESULTS: The main results included: 1) the overall identification rate for stimulation location was 92.2 ± 6.2%, while the success rate in two-site stimulation was lower than one-site stimulation; 2) the overall identification rate for pulse number was 90.8 ± 6.0%, and the subjects showed different performance in identification of the five pulse numbers; 3) the overall identification rate decreased to 80.2 ± 11.7% when the subjects were identifying paired parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the spatial (location) and temporal (pulse number) identification performance are promising in electrocutaneous stimulation on the forearm. The performance degraded when both parameters had to be identified likely due to increased cognitive load resulting from multiple tasks. Utilizing the proposed coding strategy in practical prosthetic hands remains to be investigated for clinical evaluation of its feasibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4060858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40608582014-06-18 Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm Geng, Bo Jensen, Winnie J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The need of a sensory feedback system that would improve users’ acceptance in prostheses is generally recognized. Feedback of hand opening and position are among the most important concerns of prosthetic users. To address the two concerns, this study investigated the human capability to identify pulse number and location when electrical stimulation applied on the forearm skin. The pulse number may potentially be used to encode the opening of prosthetic hands and stimulation location to encode finger position. METHODS: Ten able-bodied subjects participated in the study. Three electrodes were placed transversely across the ventral forearm spatially encoding three fingers (i.e., thumb, index, and middle finger). Five different pulse numbers (1, 4, 8, 12, and 20) encoded five levels of hand opening. The study consisted of three experiments. In the three experiments, each after a training session, the subjects were required to identify among: (a) five stimulation locations, (b) five pulse numbers, or (c) ten paired combinations of location and pulse number, respectively. The subjects’ performance in the three identification tasks was evaluated. RESULTS: The main results included: 1) the overall identification rate for stimulation location was 92.2 ± 6.2%, while the success rate in two-site stimulation was lower than one-site stimulation; 2) the overall identification rate for pulse number was 90.8 ± 6.0%, and the subjects showed different performance in identification of the five pulse numbers; 3) the overall identification rate decreased to 80.2 ± 11.7% when the subjects were identifying paired parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the spatial (location) and temporal (pulse number) identification performance are promising in electrocutaneous stimulation on the forearm. The performance degraded when both parameters had to be identified likely due to increased cognitive load resulting from multiple tasks. Utilizing the proposed coding strategy in practical prosthetic hands remains to be investigated for clinical evaluation of its feasibility. BioMed Central 2014-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4060858/ /pubmed/24908048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-97 Text en Copyright © 2014 Geng and Jensen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Geng, Bo
Jensen, Winnie
Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm
title Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm
title_full Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm
title_fullStr Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm
title_full_unstemmed Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm
title_short Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm
title_sort human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24908048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-97
work_keys_str_mv AT gengbo humanabilityinidentificationoflocationandpulsenumberforelectrocutaneousstimulationappliedontheforearm
AT jensenwinnie humanabilityinidentificationoflocationandpulsenumberforelectrocutaneousstimulationappliedontheforearm