Cargando…

The influence of negative training set size on machine learning-based virtual screening

BACKGROUND: The paper presents a thorough analysis of the influence of the number of negative training examples on the performance of machine learning methods. RESULTS: The impact of this rather neglected aspect of machine learning methods application was examined for sets containing a fixed number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurczab, Rafał, Smusz, Sabina, Bojarski, Andrzej J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4061540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24976867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-6-32
_version_ 1782321511482261504
author Kurczab, Rafał
Smusz, Sabina
Bojarski, Andrzej J
author_facet Kurczab, Rafał
Smusz, Sabina
Bojarski, Andrzej J
author_sort Kurczab, Rafał
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The paper presents a thorough analysis of the influence of the number of negative training examples on the performance of machine learning methods. RESULTS: The impact of this rather neglected aspect of machine learning methods application was examined for sets containing a fixed number of positive and a varying number of negative examples randomly selected from the ZINC database. An increase in the ratio of positive to negative training instances was found to greatly influence most of the investigated evaluating parameters of ML methods in simulated virtual screening experiments. In a majority of cases, substantial increases in precision and MCC were observed in conjunction with some decreases in hit recall. The analysis of dynamics of those variations let us recommend an optimal composition of training data. The study was performed on several protein targets, 5 machine learning algorithms (SMO, Naïve Bayes, Ibk, J48 and Random Forest) and 2 types of molecular fingerprints (MACCS and CDK FP). The most effective classification was provided by the combination of CDK FP with SMO or Random Forest algorithms. The Naïve Bayes models appeared to be hardly sensitive to changes in the number of negative instances in the training set. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the ratio of positive to negative training instances should be taken into account during the preparation of machine learning experiments, as it might significantly influence the performance of particular classifier. What is more, the optimization of negative training set size can be applied as a boosting-like approach in machine learning-based virtual screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4061540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40615402014-06-27 The influence of negative training set size on machine learning-based virtual screening Kurczab, Rafał Smusz, Sabina Bojarski, Andrzej J J Cheminform Research Article BACKGROUND: The paper presents a thorough analysis of the influence of the number of negative training examples on the performance of machine learning methods. RESULTS: The impact of this rather neglected aspect of machine learning methods application was examined for sets containing a fixed number of positive and a varying number of negative examples randomly selected from the ZINC database. An increase in the ratio of positive to negative training instances was found to greatly influence most of the investigated evaluating parameters of ML methods in simulated virtual screening experiments. In a majority of cases, substantial increases in precision and MCC were observed in conjunction with some decreases in hit recall. The analysis of dynamics of those variations let us recommend an optimal composition of training data. The study was performed on several protein targets, 5 machine learning algorithms (SMO, Naïve Bayes, Ibk, J48 and Random Forest) and 2 types of molecular fingerprints (MACCS and CDK FP). The most effective classification was provided by the combination of CDK FP with SMO or Random Forest algorithms. The Naïve Bayes models appeared to be hardly sensitive to changes in the number of negative instances in the training set. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the ratio of positive to negative training instances should be taken into account during the preparation of machine learning experiments, as it might significantly influence the performance of particular classifier. What is more, the optimization of negative training set size can be applied as a boosting-like approach in machine learning-based virtual screening. BioMed Central 2014-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4061540/ /pubmed/24976867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-6-32 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kurczab et al.; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kurczab, Rafał
Smusz, Sabina
Bojarski, Andrzej J
The influence of negative training set size on machine learning-based virtual screening
title The influence of negative training set size on machine learning-based virtual screening
title_full The influence of negative training set size on machine learning-based virtual screening
title_fullStr The influence of negative training set size on machine learning-based virtual screening
title_full_unstemmed The influence of negative training set size on machine learning-based virtual screening
title_short The influence of negative training set size on machine learning-based virtual screening
title_sort influence of negative training set size on machine learning-based virtual screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4061540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24976867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-6-32
work_keys_str_mv AT kurczabrafał theinfluenceofnegativetrainingsetsizeonmachinelearningbasedvirtualscreening
AT smuszsabina theinfluenceofnegativetrainingsetsizeonmachinelearningbasedvirtualscreening
AT bojarskiandrzejj theinfluenceofnegativetrainingsetsizeonmachinelearningbasedvirtualscreening
AT kurczabrafał influenceofnegativetrainingsetsizeonmachinelearningbasedvirtualscreening
AT smuszsabina influenceofnegativetrainingsetsizeonmachinelearningbasedvirtualscreening
AT bojarskiandrzejj influenceofnegativetrainingsetsizeonmachinelearningbasedvirtualscreening