Cargando…

The enrichment ratio of atomic contacts in crystals, an indicator derived from the Hirshfeld surface analysis

The partitioning of space with Hirshfeld surfaces enables the analysis of fingerprint molecular interactions in crystalline environments. This study uses the decomposition of the crystal contact surface between pairs of interacting chemical species to derive an enrichment ratio. This quantity enable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jelsch, Christian, Ejsmont, Krzysztof, Huder, Loïc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25075328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252514003327
_version_ 1782321590874144768
author Jelsch, Christian
Ejsmont, Krzysztof
Huder, Loïc
author_facet Jelsch, Christian
Ejsmont, Krzysztof
Huder, Loïc
author_sort Jelsch, Christian
collection PubMed
description The partitioning of space with Hirshfeld surfaces enables the analysis of fingerprint molecular interactions in crystalline environments. This study uses the decomposition of the crystal contact surface between pairs of interacting chemical species to derive an enrichment ratio. This quantity enables the analysis of the propensity of chemical species to form intermolecular interactions with themselves and other species. The enrichment ratio is obtained by comparing the actual contacts in the crystal with those computed as if all types of contacts had the same probability to form. The enrichments and contact tendencies were analyzed in several families of compounds, based on chemical composition and aromatic character. As expected, the polar contacts of the type H⋯N, H⋯O and H⋯S, which are generally hydrogen bonds, show enrichment values larger than unity. O⋯O and N⋯N contacts are impoverished while H⋯H interactions display enrichment ratios which are generally close to unity or slightly lower. In aromatic compounds, C⋯C contacts can display large enrichment ratios due to extensive π⋯π stacking in the crystal packings of heterocyclic compounds. C⋯C contacts are, however, less enriched in pure (C,H) hydrocarbons as π⋯π stacking is not so favourable from the electrostatic point of view compared with heterocycles. C⋯H contacts are favoured in (C,H) aromatics, but these interactions occur less in compounds containing O, N or S as some H atoms are then involved in hydrogen bonds. The study also highlights the fact that hydrogen is a prefered interaction partner for fluorine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4062089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40620892014-07-24 The enrichment ratio of atomic contacts in crystals, an indicator derived from the Hirshfeld surface analysis Jelsch, Christian Ejsmont, Krzysztof Huder, Loïc IUCrJ Research Papers The partitioning of space with Hirshfeld surfaces enables the analysis of fingerprint molecular interactions in crystalline environments. This study uses the decomposition of the crystal contact surface between pairs of interacting chemical species to derive an enrichment ratio. This quantity enables the analysis of the propensity of chemical species to form intermolecular interactions with themselves and other species. The enrichment ratio is obtained by comparing the actual contacts in the crystal with those computed as if all types of contacts had the same probability to form. The enrichments and contact tendencies were analyzed in several families of compounds, based on chemical composition and aromatic character. As expected, the polar contacts of the type H⋯N, H⋯O and H⋯S, which are generally hydrogen bonds, show enrichment values larger than unity. O⋯O and N⋯N contacts are impoverished while H⋯H interactions display enrichment ratios which are generally close to unity or slightly lower. In aromatic compounds, C⋯C contacts can display large enrichment ratios due to extensive π⋯π stacking in the crystal packings of heterocyclic compounds. C⋯C contacts are, however, less enriched in pure (C,H) hydrocarbons as π⋯π stacking is not so favourable from the electrostatic point of view compared with heterocycles. C⋯H contacts are favoured in (C,H) aromatics, but these interactions occur less in compounds containing O, N or S as some H atoms are then involved in hydrogen bonds. The study also highlights the fact that hydrogen is a prefered interaction partner for fluorine. International Union of Crystallography 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4062089/ /pubmed/25075328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252514003327 Text en © Christian Jelsch et al. 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Jelsch, Christian
Ejsmont, Krzysztof
Huder, Loïc
The enrichment ratio of atomic contacts in crystals, an indicator derived from the Hirshfeld surface analysis
title The enrichment ratio of atomic contacts in crystals, an indicator derived from the Hirshfeld surface analysis
title_full The enrichment ratio of atomic contacts in crystals, an indicator derived from the Hirshfeld surface analysis
title_fullStr The enrichment ratio of atomic contacts in crystals, an indicator derived from the Hirshfeld surface analysis
title_full_unstemmed The enrichment ratio of atomic contacts in crystals, an indicator derived from the Hirshfeld surface analysis
title_short The enrichment ratio of atomic contacts in crystals, an indicator derived from the Hirshfeld surface analysis
title_sort enrichment ratio of atomic contacts in crystals, an indicator derived from the hirshfeld surface analysis
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25075328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252514003327
work_keys_str_mv AT jelschchristian theenrichmentratioofatomiccontactsincrystalsanindicatorderivedfromthehirshfeldsurfaceanalysis
AT ejsmontkrzysztof theenrichmentratioofatomiccontactsincrystalsanindicatorderivedfromthehirshfeldsurfaceanalysis
AT huderloic theenrichmentratioofatomiccontactsincrystalsanindicatorderivedfromthehirshfeldsurfaceanalysis
AT jelschchristian enrichmentratioofatomiccontactsincrystalsanindicatorderivedfromthehirshfeldsurfaceanalysis
AT ejsmontkrzysztof enrichmentratioofatomiccontactsincrystalsanindicatorderivedfromthehirshfeldsurfaceanalysis
AT huderloic enrichmentratioofatomiccontactsincrystalsanindicatorderivedfromthehirshfeldsurfaceanalysis