Cargando…

Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study)

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in conducting clinical and cluster randomized trials through electronic health records. This paper reports on the methodological issues identified during the implementation of two cluster randomized trials using the electronic health records of the Clinical Prac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gulliford, Martin C, van Staa, Tjeerd P, McDermott, Lisa, McCann, Gerard, Charlton, Judith, Dregan, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24919485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-220
_version_ 1782321622499196928
author Gulliford, Martin C
van Staa, Tjeerd P
McDermott, Lisa
McCann, Gerard
Charlton, Judith
Dregan, Alex
author_facet Gulliford, Martin C
van Staa, Tjeerd P
McDermott, Lisa
McCann, Gerard
Charlton, Judith
Dregan, Alex
author_sort Gulliford, Martin C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in conducting clinical and cluster randomized trials through electronic health records. This paper reports on the methodological issues identified during the implementation of two cluster randomized trials using the electronic health records of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). METHODS: Two trials were completed in primary care: one aimed to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infection; the other aimed to increase physician adherence with secondary prevention interventions after first stroke. The paper draws on documentary records and trial datasets to report on the methodological experience with respect to research ethics and research governance approval, general practice recruitment and allocation, sample size calculation and power, intervention implementation, and trial analysis. RESULTS: We obtained research governance approvals from more than 150 primary care organizations in England, Wales, and Scotland. There were 104 CPRD general practices recruited to the antibiotic trial and 106 to the stroke trial, with the target number of practices being recruited within six months. Interventions were installed into practice information systems remotely over the internet. The mean number of participants per practice was 5,588 in the antibiotic trial and 110 in the stroke trial, with the coefficient of variation of practice sizes being 0.53 and 0.56 respectively. Outcome measures showed substantial correlations between the 12 months before, and after intervention, with coefficients ranging from 0.42 for diastolic blood pressure to 0.91 for proportion of consultations with antibiotics prescribed, defining practice and participant eligibility for analysis requires careful consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Cluster randomized trials may be performed efficiently in large samples from UK general practices using the electronic health records of a primary care database. The geographical dispersal of trial sites presents a difficulty for research governance approval and intervention implementation. Pretrial data analyses should inform trial design and analysis plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 47558792 and ISRCTN 35701810 (both registered on 17 March 2010).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4062282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40622822014-06-27 Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study) Gulliford, Martin C van Staa, Tjeerd P McDermott, Lisa McCann, Gerard Charlton, Judith Dregan, Alex Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in conducting clinical and cluster randomized trials through electronic health records. This paper reports on the methodological issues identified during the implementation of two cluster randomized trials using the electronic health records of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). METHODS: Two trials were completed in primary care: one aimed to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infection; the other aimed to increase physician adherence with secondary prevention interventions after first stroke. The paper draws on documentary records and trial datasets to report on the methodological experience with respect to research ethics and research governance approval, general practice recruitment and allocation, sample size calculation and power, intervention implementation, and trial analysis. RESULTS: We obtained research governance approvals from more than 150 primary care organizations in England, Wales, and Scotland. There were 104 CPRD general practices recruited to the antibiotic trial and 106 to the stroke trial, with the target number of practices being recruited within six months. Interventions were installed into practice information systems remotely over the internet. The mean number of participants per practice was 5,588 in the antibiotic trial and 110 in the stroke trial, with the coefficient of variation of practice sizes being 0.53 and 0.56 respectively. Outcome measures showed substantial correlations between the 12 months before, and after intervention, with coefficients ranging from 0.42 for diastolic blood pressure to 0.91 for proportion of consultations with antibiotics prescribed, defining practice and participant eligibility for analysis requires careful consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Cluster randomized trials may be performed efficiently in large samples from UK general practices using the electronic health records of a primary care database. The geographical dispersal of trial sites presents a difficulty for research governance approval and intervention implementation. Pretrial data analyses should inform trial design and analysis plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 47558792 and ISRCTN 35701810 (both registered on 17 March 2010). BioMed Central 2014-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4062282/ /pubmed/24919485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-220 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gulliford et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Gulliford, Martin C
van Staa, Tjeerd P
McDermott, Lisa
McCann, Gerard
Charlton, Judith
Dregan, Alex
Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study)
title Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study)
title_full Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study)
title_fullStr Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study)
title_full_unstemmed Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study)
title_short Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study)
title_sort cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (ecrt study)
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24919485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-220
work_keys_str_mv AT gullifordmartinc clusterrandomizedtrialsutilizingprimarycareelectronichealthrecordsmethodologicalissuesindesignconductandanalysisecrtstudy
AT vanstaatjeerdp clusterrandomizedtrialsutilizingprimarycareelectronichealthrecordsmethodologicalissuesindesignconductandanalysisecrtstudy
AT mcdermottlisa clusterrandomizedtrialsutilizingprimarycareelectronichealthrecordsmethodologicalissuesindesignconductandanalysisecrtstudy
AT mccanngerard clusterrandomizedtrialsutilizingprimarycareelectronichealthrecordsmethodologicalissuesindesignconductandanalysisecrtstudy
AT charltonjudith clusterrandomizedtrialsutilizingprimarycareelectronichealthrecordsmethodologicalissuesindesignconductandanalysisecrtstudy
AT dreganalex clusterrandomizedtrialsutilizingprimarycareelectronichealthrecordsmethodologicalissuesindesignconductandanalysisecrtstudy