Cargando…
Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes
BACKGROUND: Randomised trials provide evidence that patient decision aids improve outcomes with respect to patient knowledge, involvement and satisfaction in decision making. It is less clear how these complex interventions are implemented within patient-clinician interactions and which components a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24908099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-347 |
_version_ | 1782321623627464704 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Ian Bradley, Alastair Ng, Chirk Jenn Colwell, Brigitte Mathers, Nigel |
author_facet | Brown, Ian Bradley, Alastair Ng, Chirk Jenn Colwell, Brigitte Mathers, Nigel |
author_sort | Brown, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Randomised trials provide evidence that patient decision aids improve outcomes with respect to patient knowledge, involvement and satisfaction in decision making. It is less clear how these complex interventions are implemented within patient-clinician interactions and which components are active for improving decision processes. To investigate the experiences of using a diabetes treatment decision aid and to explore how components within a complex intervention influenced the decision making process. METHODS: A pragmatic mixed methods study nested within the PANDAs cluster randomised trial of a patient decision aid. Themes inductively derived from interviews and observation of consultations with further triangulation with results of decision quality and involvement measurements and case analyses. RESULTS: The decision aid intervention was employed flexibly within the consultation with both the patient and clinician active in marshalling elements. The decision aid improved processing and organization of information needed for decision making within the consultation interaction. It also improved decision quality by preparing the patient for active involvement within the clinical consultation. CONCLUSION: The intervention was acceptable, flexible and readily implemented in primary care consultations. The decision aid was effective in facilitating cognitive processing. The intervention also facilitated rehearsal in preparation for active roles in a shared decision process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trials Register Number: ISRCTN14842077. Date registered: 24.06.2010. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4062287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40622872014-06-19 Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes Brown, Ian Bradley, Alastair Ng, Chirk Jenn Colwell, Brigitte Mathers, Nigel BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Randomised trials provide evidence that patient decision aids improve outcomes with respect to patient knowledge, involvement and satisfaction in decision making. It is less clear how these complex interventions are implemented within patient-clinician interactions and which components are active for improving decision processes. To investigate the experiences of using a diabetes treatment decision aid and to explore how components within a complex intervention influenced the decision making process. METHODS: A pragmatic mixed methods study nested within the PANDAs cluster randomised trial of a patient decision aid. Themes inductively derived from interviews and observation of consultations with further triangulation with results of decision quality and involvement measurements and case analyses. RESULTS: The decision aid intervention was employed flexibly within the consultation with both the patient and clinician active in marshalling elements. The decision aid improved processing and organization of information needed for decision making within the consultation interaction. It also improved decision quality by preparing the patient for active involvement within the clinical consultation. CONCLUSION: The intervention was acceptable, flexible and readily implemented in primary care consultations. The decision aid was effective in facilitating cognitive processing. The intervention also facilitated rehearsal in preparation for active roles in a shared decision process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trials Register Number: ISRCTN14842077. Date registered: 24.06.2010. BioMed Central 2014-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4062287/ /pubmed/24908099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-347 Text en Copyright © 2014 Brown et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brown, Ian Bradley, Alastair Ng, Chirk Jenn Colwell, Brigitte Mathers, Nigel Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes |
title | Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes |
title_full | Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes |
title_fullStr | Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes |
title_short | Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes |
title_sort | investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the patient and decision aids (pandas) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24908099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownian investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT bradleyalastair investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT ngchirkjenn investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT colwellbrigitte investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT mathersnigel investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes |