Cargando…

Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Randomised trials provide evidence that patient decision aids improve outcomes with respect to patient knowledge, involvement and satisfaction in decision making. It is less clear how these complex interventions are implemented within patient-clinician interactions and which components a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Ian, Bradley, Alastair, Ng, Chirk Jenn, Colwell, Brigitte, Mathers, Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24908099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-347
_version_ 1782321623627464704
author Brown, Ian
Bradley, Alastair
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Colwell, Brigitte
Mathers, Nigel
author_facet Brown, Ian
Bradley, Alastair
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Colwell, Brigitte
Mathers, Nigel
author_sort Brown, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomised trials provide evidence that patient decision aids improve outcomes with respect to patient knowledge, involvement and satisfaction in decision making. It is less clear how these complex interventions are implemented within patient-clinician interactions and which components are active for improving decision processes. To investigate the experiences of using a diabetes treatment decision aid and to explore how components within a complex intervention influenced the decision making process. METHODS: A pragmatic mixed methods study nested within the PANDAs cluster randomised trial of a patient decision aid. Themes inductively derived from interviews and observation of consultations with further triangulation with results of decision quality and involvement measurements and case analyses. RESULTS: The decision aid intervention was employed flexibly within the consultation with both the patient and clinician active in marshalling elements. The decision aid improved processing and organization of information needed for decision making within the consultation interaction. It also improved decision quality by preparing the patient for active involvement within the clinical consultation. CONCLUSION: The intervention was acceptable, flexible and readily implemented in primary care consultations. The decision aid was effective in facilitating cognitive processing. The intervention also facilitated rehearsal in preparation for active roles in a shared decision process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trials Register Number: ISRCTN14842077. Date registered: 24.06.2010.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4062287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40622872014-06-19 Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes Brown, Ian Bradley, Alastair Ng, Chirk Jenn Colwell, Brigitte Mathers, Nigel BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Randomised trials provide evidence that patient decision aids improve outcomes with respect to patient knowledge, involvement and satisfaction in decision making. It is less clear how these complex interventions are implemented within patient-clinician interactions and which components are active for improving decision processes. To investigate the experiences of using a diabetes treatment decision aid and to explore how components within a complex intervention influenced the decision making process. METHODS: A pragmatic mixed methods study nested within the PANDAs cluster randomised trial of a patient decision aid. Themes inductively derived from interviews and observation of consultations with further triangulation with results of decision quality and involvement measurements and case analyses. RESULTS: The decision aid intervention was employed flexibly within the consultation with both the patient and clinician active in marshalling elements. The decision aid improved processing and organization of information needed for decision making within the consultation interaction. It also improved decision quality by preparing the patient for active involvement within the clinical consultation. CONCLUSION: The intervention was acceptable, flexible and readily implemented in primary care consultations. The decision aid was effective in facilitating cognitive processing. The intervention also facilitated rehearsal in preparation for active roles in a shared decision process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trials Register Number: ISRCTN14842077. Date registered: 24.06.2010. BioMed Central 2014-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4062287/ /pubmed/24908099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-347 Text en Copyright © 2014 Brown et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brown, Ian
Bradley, Alastair
Ng, Chirk Jenn
Colwell, Brigitte
Mathers, Nigel
Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes
title Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes
title_full Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes
title_short Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes
title_sort investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the patient and decision aids (pandas) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24908099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-347
work_keys_str_mv AT brownian investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT bradleyalastair investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT ngchirkjenn investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT colwellbrigitte investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT mathersnigel investigatingactiveingredientsinacomplexinterventionanestedstudywithinthepatientanddecisionaidspandasrandomisedcontrolledtrialforpeoplewithtype2diabetes