Cargando…
The Impact and Cost of Scaling up Midwifery and Obstetrics in 58 Low- and Middle-Income Countries
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: To guide achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, we used the Lives Saved Tool to provide a novel simulation of potential maternal, fetal, and newborn lives and costs saved by scaling up midwifery and obstetrics services, including family planning, in 58 low- and midd...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24941336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098550 |
_version_ | 1782321640564064256 |
---|---|
author | Bartlett, Linda Weissman, Eva Gubin, Rehana Patton-Molitors, Rachel Friberg, Ingrid K. |
author_facet | Bartlett, Linda Weissman, Eva Gubin, Rehana Patton-Molitors, Rachel Friberg, Ingrid K. |
author_sort | Bartlett, Linda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND METHODS: To guide achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, we used the Lives Saved Tool to provide a novel simulation of potential maternal, fetal, and newborn lives and costs saved by scaling up midwifery and obstetrics services, including family planning, in 58 low- and middle-income countries. Typical midwifery and obstetrics interventions were scaled to either 60% of the national population (modest coverage) or 99% (universal coverage). FINDINGS: Under even a modest scale-up, midwifery services including family planning reduce maternal, fetal, and neonatal deaths by 34%. Increasing midwifery alone or integrated with obstetrics is more cost-effective than scaling up obstetrics alone; when family planning was included, the midwifery model was almost twice as cost-effective as the obstetrics model, at $2,200 versus $4,200 per death averted. The most effective strategy was the most comprehensive: increasing midwives, obstetricians, and family planning could prevent 69% of total deaths under universal scale-up, yielding a cost per death prevented of just $2,100. Within this analysis, the interventions which midwifery and obstetrics are poised to deliver most effectively are different, with midwifery benefits delivered across the continuum of pre-pregnancy, prenatal, labor and delivery, and postpartum-postnatal care, and obstetrics benefits focused mostly on delivery. Including family planning within each scope of practice reduced the number of likely births, and thus deaths, and increased the cost-effectiveness of the entire package (e.g., a 52% reduction in deaths with midwifery and obstetrics increased to 69% when family planning was added; cost decreased from $4,000 to $2,100 per death averted). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that scaling up midwifery and obstetrics could bring many countries closer to achieving mortality reductions. Midwives alone can achieve remarkable mortality reductions, particularly when they also perform family planning services - the greatest return on investment occurs with the scale-up of midwives and obstetricians together. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4062394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40623942014-06-24 The Impact and Cost of Scaling up Midwifery and Obstetrics in 58 Low- and Middle-Income Countries Bartlett, Linda Weissman, Eva Gubin, Rehana Patton-Molitors, Rachel Friberg, Ingrid K. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND METHODS: To guide achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, we used the Lives Saved Tool to provide a novel simulation of potential maternal, fetal, and newborn lives and costs saved by scaling up midwifery and obstetrics services, including family planning, in 58 low- and middle-income countries. Typical midwifery and obstetrics interventions were scaled to either 60% of the national population (modest coverage) or 99% (universal coverage). FINDINGS: Under even a modest scale-up, midwifery services including family planning reduce maternal, fetal, and neonatal deaths by 34%. Increasing midwifery alone or integrated with obstetrics is more cost-effective than scaling up obstetrics alone; when family planning was included, the midwifery model was almost twice as cost-effective as the obstetrics model, at $2,200 versus $4,200 per death averted. The most effective strategy was the most comprehensive: increasing midwives, obstetricians, and family planning could prevent 69% of total deaths under universal scale-up, yielding a cost per death prevented of just $2,100. Within this analysis, the interventions which midwifery and obstetrics are poised to deliver most effectively are different, with midwifery benefits delivered across the continuum of pre-pregnancy, prenatal, labor and delivery, and postpartum-postnatal care, and obstetrics benefits focused mostly on delivery. Including family planning within each scope of practice reduced the number of likely births, and thus deaths, and increased the cost-effectiveness of the entire package (e.g., a 52% reduction in deaths with midwifery and obstetrics increased to 69% when family planning was added; cost decreased from $4,000 to $2,100 per death averted). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that scaling up midwifery and obstetrics could bring many countries closer to achieving mortality reductions. Midwives alone can achieve remarkable mortality reductions, particularly when they also perform family planning services - the greatest return on investment occurs with the scale-up of midwives and obstetricians together. Public Library of Science 2014-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4062394/ /pubmed/24941336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098550 Text en © 2014 Bartlett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bartlett, Linda Weissman, Eva Gubin, Rehana Patton-Molitors, Rachel Friberg, Ingrid K. The Impact and Cost of Scaling up Midwifery and Obstetrics in 58 Low- and Middle-Income Countries |
title | The Impact and Cost of Scaling up Midwifery and Obstetrics in 58 Low- and Middle-Income Countries |
title_full | The Impact and Cost of Scaling up Midwifery and Obstetrics in 58 Low- and Middle-Income Countries |
title_fullStr | The Impact and Cost of Scaling up Midwifery and Obstetrics in 58 Low- and Middle-Income Countries |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact and Cost of Scaling up Midwifery and Obstetrics in 58 Low- and Middle-Income Countries |
title_short | The Impact and Cost of Scaling up Midwifery and Obstetrics in 58 Low- and Middle-Income Countries |
title_sort | impact and cost of scaling up midwifery and obstetrics in 58 low- and middle-income countries |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24941336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartlettlinda theimpactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries AT weissmaneva theimpactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries AT gubinrehana theimpactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries AT pattonmolitorsrachel theimpactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries AT fribergingridk theimpactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries AT bartlettlinda impactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries AT weissmaneva impactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries AT gubinrehana impactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries AT pattonmolitorsrachel impactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries AT fribergingridk impactandcostofscalingupmidwiferyandobstetricsin58lowandmiddleincomecountries |